For me, I have an iPhone with TweetDeck. Twitter is an awesome tool for getting the pulse of virtually anything going on. It really helps figure out where people are leaning on particular days. Some people use it to post personal things like what they ate and so forth, and I find that unnecessary. However, as a way of spreading information virally and instanteously, Twitter is the best thing out there, IMHO.
Walshgate: How come top Mass. Dem couldn't hook up with Rachel Maddow by more traditional means?
By adamg - 3/5/10 - 7:47 pm
UPDATE: Maddow declares she isn't running; appreciates a good joke as much as anyone.
OK, so it was kind of interesting this morning that some people had set up a Facebook page to try to convince MSNBC talent and Northhampton resident Rachel Maddow to run against Scott Brown in 2012 (they're now 5.2% of the way toward their goal of getting 10,000 people to sign up). It got even funner this afternoon when John Walsh, chairman of the Democratic State Committee, got wind of the boomlet and posted what sure seemed like it was meant to be a private message on the Tweety:
Some are talking about you running vs Scott Brown in '12. I'm Chair of MA Dem Party. My email is
[email protected] cell-617-650-9311
Apparently I'm not the only one disappointed to learn that politicians don't have instant access to everybody's phone numbers (you know how losing candidates always call the winning candidate on election night - where do they get their phone numbers from?) - there's now a Twitter discussion on #walshgate. And please, for goodness sake, don't go calling Walsh and asking if his refrigerator is running.
Amy Derjue, who has some familiarity with Twitter issues, provides this thought:
#walshgate is like clicking "reply to all" in Outlook. But to the whole internet. Cue overwhelming paranoia whenever DMing from now on.