The Trump Administration and Cabinet.

ok, I'm gonna let it rip so pardon my sarong...

Unfortunately I suspect the disappointment in some of Trump's cabinet appointments, especially in the foreign policy realm*
are well-founded. When one considers it's not an outlier, it's an actual pattern, then it's really warranted to start believing the duck is a duck after all.

Trump was rumoured to be considering both Larry Fink, founder of Blackrock, and Jamie Dimon CEO of JP Morgan Chase for Treasury Secretary. He managed to do worse (than Dimon at least) but perhaps not Fink -- by nominating the trader who MADE Grigory Schwartz into "George Soros" with a capital S -- made him a BILLIONAIRE in the early 1990's by SMASHING the British Pound. He's also a Harriman intern (Skull & Bones), and a Wolf's Head Society member at Yale (they have their own crypt). This means that Bessent is a real enemy of state currency. You see, it's just not good enough that they own the state money, because the state money is STILL controlled by the people's reps, whether that be the Parliament, the royals, or the US Congress. What they really want to do is SEVER that tie all the way. One may say they've already done so, with the Bank of London and the Federal Reserve (actually these are the SAME ENTITY) -- however, as has been their m.o. since they took greater power, starting in the late 80s and 90s, the acceleration of the debasement program has incrementally and in COMPOUNDING FASHION debauched the people's money ALMOST completely.

Trump is not going to do a single thing to stop inflation. This is why he wants Powell out, but he can't get rid of him until his term ends, because Powell has been TRYING to defend the value of the dollar with his rate hikes. Trump only cares about ASSET GROWTH for the uber-elites, so his plan is to lower interest rates back down to near-zero, so the ASSET CLASS (the unearned income class) can inflate their asset values in the equity markets. This includes the neo-asset cryptocurrencies which Bessent is a huge advocate for. Along with the surveillance and blockchain tyranny benefits, ultimately the cryptos are planned to linked to bio-chips and personal bank accounts directly fed into the matrix, for which patents like Microsoft's 666 patent have already been awarded years ago. Since cryptos such as the "bitcoin" have absolutely no inherent value, they cannot be assessed on a financial basis, like all other tangible assets can. This means they may be deemed to be worth a billion dollars per "bitcoin", or zero dollars per "bitcoin". Without an actual presence in the physical reality, the cryptos are mere computer programs. The programs are coded to perform certain price reactions, but those coded pricing algorithms are not necessarily coded to react to "supply and demand" mechanisms. This means that a cryptocurrency can actually rise in dollar value even if more people are selling it than buying it. It means that the crypto elites can UNLOAD at any exit point they choose, at any value they select, while the unknowing peons and pumpers can spend more and more dollars to buy the "bitcoin", and the price can rise, even when the sell ratio is say, 9-1.

As this crypto regime expands, the people's monies, in all countries, are debased further, exchanged at less and less value, and while the people exchange real money (lawful money) for the fake asset (they don't care if it has no inherent value, they only care that it's "going up") they are deprived of the lawful money that is controlled by them, and its held ratios decrease. As the held ratios decrease, they exchange value drops, because the currency markets, the forex, are NOT pre-programmed like crypto, they are still operated by actual humans with needful deposits whether they buy or sell, it moves that market, and the values are also interpreted to have real-world drivers, such as government data in that country and the state of its economic health.

Additionally, the financial plans which Trump has already campaigned on, they are actually very bad for the lower-middle class, who depend upon dollar strength in order to afford goods and services every day. For example, when Trump talks about developing energy footholds on OUR PUBLIC LANDS, he's actually talking about STEALING YOUR LAND and giving its resource rights to the Rockefellers, Soroses and Finks. YOU, as an American OWN THAT LAND. YOU should receive a partial payment for its resource rights. (i.e. Alaska does that and sends an annual cheque to its citizens). Unfortunately, Trump will "sell" them to the international elites, then this money (which they merely printed) is remitted to the government, and the government actually just GIVES IT ALL BACK to them, by spending on the military or to pay the debt, etc. So, the resource rights actually COST THEM NOTHING.

Then, this not being BAD ENOUGH, there may yet be a small deflationary effect, if production is high enough, HOWEVER that effect is going to ENTIRELY VAPORIZED because the international elites are going to take that energy and SELL IT OVERSEAS -- rather than allow it to disperse entirely in the United States. If it were restricted for domestic consumption, prices for fuel would fall. Unfortunately, it will be shipped to Asia and Europe instead, which totally removed any potential deflationary effect here at home. The reason for it is that the elites can GRAFT more profit by selling it overseas, and it has political and military leverage, over vassal states like the EU, which they force to buy the expensive fuel from their corporations, instead of Russia, or Venezuela.

Alas, it's just more screwing and it's over the heads of most people to understand just how royal this screwing really is, and I've only touched upon Bessent, and the others are neocons with big mouths, except for Gabbard, who is only there, like RFK, as a purely transactional reward, that won't be allowed to ACTUALLY DO ANYTHING, just a cosmetic tit-for-tat. Gorka and Waltz and Rubio - these are the REAL MOUTHPIECES for Trump, because Trump didn't have to appoint them. They deserved nothing, but he CHOSE THEM because they espouse the program he does.

We, as Americans, don't get any of this, and the few who do, are totally without recourse here. The world, however, understands pefectly well, and this is why they are ONLY BEGINNING to reject the US and the UK. You're going to see virtually all the world reject them. They have to, it's self-defence!
 
  • Like
Reactions: PAF
ok, I'm gonna let it rip so pardon my sarong...

Unfortunately I suspect the disappointment in some of Trump's cabinet appointments, especially in the foreign policy realm*
are well-founded. When one considers it's not an outlier, it's an actual pattern, then it's really warranted to start believing the duck is a duck after all.

Trump was rumoured to be considering both Larry Fink, founder of Blackrock, and Jamie Dimon CEO of JP Morgan Chase for Treasury Secretary. He managed to do worse (than Dimon at least) but perhaps not Fink -- by nominating the trader who MADE Grigory Schwartz into "George Soros" with a capital S -- made him a BILLIONAIRE in the early 1990's by SMASHING the British Pound. He's also a Harriman intern (Skull & Bones), and a Wolf's Head Society member at Yale (they have their own crypt). This means that Bessent is a real enemy of state currency. You see, it's just not good enough that they own the state money, because the state money is STILL controlled by the people's reps, whether that be the Parliament, the royals, or the US Congress. What they really want to do is SEVER that tie all the way. One may say they've already done so, with the Bank of London and the Federal Reserve (actually these are the SAME ENTITY) -- however, as has been their m.o. since they took greater power, starting in the late 80s and 90s, the acceleration of the debasement program has incrementally and in COMPOUNDING FASHION debauched the people's money ALMOST completely.

Trump is not going to do a single thing to stop inflation. This is why he wants Powell out, but he can't get rid of him until his term ends, because Powell has been TRYING to defend the value of the dollar with his rate hikes. Trump only cares about ASSET GROWTH for the uber-elites, so his plan is to lower interest rates back down to near-zero, so the ASSET CLASS (the unearned income class) can inflate their asset values in the equity markets. This includes the neo-asset cryptocurrencies which Bessent is a huge advocate for. Along with the surveillance and blockchain tyranny benefits, ultimately the cryptos are planned to linked to bio-chips and personal bank accounts directly fed into the matrix, for which patents like Microsoft's 666 patent have already been awarded years ago. Since cryptos such as the "bitcoin" have absolutely no inherent value, they cannot be assessed on a financial basis, like all other tangible assets can. This means they may be deemed to be worth a billion dollars per "bitcoin", or zero dollars per "bitcoin". Without an actual presence in the physical reality, the cryptos are mere computer programs. The programs are coded to perform certain price reactions, but those coded pricing algorithms are not necessarily coded to react to "supply and demand" mechanisms. This means that a cryptocurrency can actually rise in dollar value even if more people are selling it than buying it. It means that the crypto elites can UNLOAD at any exit point they choose, at any value they select, while the unknowing peons and pumpers can spend more and more dollars to buy the "bitcoin", and the price can rise, even when the sell ratio is say, 9-1.

As this crypto regime expands, the people's monies, in all countries, are debased further, exchanged at less and less value, and while the people exchange real money (lawful money) for the fake asset (they don't care if it has no inherent value, they only care that it's "going up") they are deprived of the lawful money that is controlled by them, and its held ratios decrease. As the held ratios decrease, they exchange value drops, because the currency markets, the forex, are NOT pre-programmed like crypto, they are still operated by actual humans with needful deposits whether they buy or sell, it moves that market, and the values are also interpreted to have real-world drivers, such as government data in that country and the state of its economic health.

Additionally, the financial plans which Trump has already campaigned on, they are actually very bad for the lower-middle class, who depend upon dollar strength in order to afford goods and services every day. For example, when Trump talks about developing energy footholds on OUR PUBLIC LANDS, he's actually talking about STEALING YOUR LAND and giving its resource rights to the Rockefellers, Soroses and Finks. YOU, as an American OWN THAT LAND. YOU should receive a partial payment for its resource rights. (i.e. Alaska does that and sends an annual cheque to its citizens). Unfortunately, Trump will "sell" them to the international elites, then this money (which they merely printed) is remitted to the government, and the government actually just GIVES IT ALL BACK to them, by spending on the military or to pay the debt, etc. So, the resource rights actually COST THEM NOTHING.

Then, this not being BAD ENOUGH, there may yet be a small deflationary effect, if production is high enough, HOWEVER that effect is going to ENTIRELY VAPORIZED because the international elites are going to take that energy and SELL IT OVERSEAS -- rather than allow it to disperse entirely in the United States. If it were restricted for domestic consumption, prices for fuel would fall. Unfortunately, it will be shipped to Asia and Europe instead, which totally removed any potential deflationary effect here at home. The reason for it is that the elites can GRAFT more profit by selling it overseas, and it has political and military leverage, over vassal states like the EU, which they force to buy the expensive fuel from their corporations, instead of Russia, or Venezuela.

Alas, it's just more screwing and it's over the heads of most people to understand just how royal this screwing really is, and I've only touched upon Bessent, and the others are neocons with big mouths, except for Gabbard, who is only there, like RFK, as a purely transactional reward, that won't be allowed to ACTUALLY DO ANYTHING, just a cosmetic tit-for-tat. Gorka and Waltz and Rubio - these are the REAL MOUTHPIECES for Trump, because Trump didn't have to appoint them. They deserved nothing, but he CHOSE THEM because they espouse the program he does.

We, as Americans, don't get any of this, and the few who do, are totally without recourse here. The world, however, understands pefectly well, and this is why they are ONLY BEGINNING to reject the US and the UK. You're going to see virtually all the world reject them. They have to, it's self-defence!


That was some long reading there, [MENTION=35668]Snowball[/MENTION] , sheez.


That said, you NAILED it :100: and I hope every person who comes across this will read it :100:
 
ok, I'm gonna let it rip so pardon my sarong...

Unfortunately I suspect the disappointment in some of Trump's cabinet appointments, especially in the foreign policy realm*
are well-founded. When one considers it's not an outlier, it's an actual pattern, then it's really warranted to start believing the duck is a duck after all.

Trump was rumoured to be considering both Larry Fink, founder of Blackrock, and Jamie Dimon CEO of JP Morgan Chase for Treasury Secretary. He managed to do worse (than Dimon at least) but perhaps not Fink -- by nominating the trader who MADE Grigory Schwartz into "George Soros" with a capital S -- made him a BILLIONAIRE in the early 1990's by SMASHING the British Pound. He's also a Harriman intern (Skull & Bones), and a Wolf's Head Society member at Yale (they have their own crypt). This means that Bessent is a real enemy of state currency. You see, it's just not good enough that they own the state money, because the state money is STILL controlled by the people's reps, whether that be the Parliament, the royals, or the US Congress. What they really want to do is SEVER that tie all the way. One may say they've already done so, with the Bank of London and the Federal Reserve (actually these are the SAME ENTITY) -- however, as has been their m.o. since they took greater power, starting in the late 80s and 90s, the acceleration of the debasement program has incrementally and in COMPOUNDING FASHION debauched the people's money ALMOST completely.

Trump is not going to do a single thing to stop inflation. This is why he wants Powell out, but he can't get rid of him until his term ends, because Powell has been TRYING to defend the value of the dollar with his rate hikes. Trump only cares about ASSET GROWTH for the uber-elites, so his plan is to lower interest rates back down to near-zero, so the ASSET CLASS (the unearned income class) can inflate their asset values in the equity markets. This includes the neo-asset cryptocurrencies which Bessent is a huge advocate for. Along with the surveillance and blockchain tyranny benefits, ultimately the cryptos are planned to linked to bio-chips and personal bank accounts directly fed into the matrix, for which patents like Microsoft's 666 patent have already been awarded years ago. Since cryptos such as the "bitcoin" have absolutely no inherent value, they cannot be assessed on a financial basis, like all other tangible assets can. This means they may be deemed to be worth a billion dollars per "bitcoin", or zero dollars per "bitcoin". Without an actual presence in the physical reality, the cryptos are mere computer programs. The programs are coded to perform certain price reactions, but those coded pricing algorithms are not necessarily coded to react to "supply and demand" mechanisms. This means that a cryptocurrency can actually rise in dollar value even if more people are selling it than buying it. It means that the crypto elites can UNLOAD at any exit point they choose, at any value they select, while the unknowing peons and pumpers can spend more and more dollars to buy the "bitcoin", and the price can rise, even when the sell ratio is say, 9-1.

As this crypto regime expands, the people's monies, in all countries, are debased further, exchanged at less and less value, and while the people exchange real money (lawful money) for the fake asset (they don't care if it has no inherent value, they only care that it's "going up") they are deprived of the lawful money that is controlled by them, and its held ratios decrease. As the held ratios decrease, they exchange value drops, because the currency markets, the forex, are NOT pre-programmed like crypto, they are still operated by actual humans with needful deposits whether they buy or sell, it moves that market, and the values are also interpreted to have real-world drivers, such as government data in that country and the state of its economic health.

Additionally, the financial plans which Trump has already campaigned on, they are actually very bad for the lower-middle class, who depend upon dollar strength in order to afford goods and services every day. For example, when Trump talks about developing energy footholds on OUR PUBLIC LANDS, he's actually talking about STEALING YOUR LAND and giving its resource rights to the Rockefellers, Soroses and Finks. YOU, as an American OWN THAT LAND. YOU should receive a partial payment for its resource rights. (i.e. Alaska does that and sends an annual cheque to its citizens). Unfortunately, Trump will "sell" them to the international elites, then this money (which they merely printed) is remitted to the government, and the government actually just GIVES IT ALL BACK to them, by spending on the military or to pay the debt, etc. So, the resource rights actually COST THEM NOTHING.

Then, this not being BAD ENOUGH, there may yet be a small deflationary effect, if production is high enough, HOWEVER that effect is going to ENTIRELY VAPORIZED because the international elites are going to take that energy and SELL IT OVERSEAS -- rather than allow it to disperse entirely in the United States. If it were restricted for domestic consumption, prices for fuel would fall. Unfortunately, it will be shipped to Asia and Europe instead, which totally removed any potential deflationary effect here at home. The reason for it is that the elites can GRAFT more profit by selling it overseas, and it has political and military leverage, over vassal states like the EU, which they force to buy the expensive fuel from their corporations, instead of Russia, or Venezuela.

Alas, it's just more screwing and it's over the heads of most people to understand just how royal this screwing really is, and I've only touched upon Bessent, and the others are neocons with big mouths, except for Gabbard, who is only there, like RFK, as a purely transactional reward, that won't be allowed to ACTUALLY DO ANYTHING, just a cosmetic tit-for-tat. Gorka and Waltz and Rubio - these are the REAL MOUTHPIECES for Trump, because Trump didn't have to appoint them. They deserved nothing, but he CHOSE THEM because they espouse the program he does.

We, as Americans, don't get any of this, and the few who do, are totally without recourse here. The world, however, understands pefectly well, and this is why they are ONLY BEGINNING to reject the US and the UK. You're going to see virtually all the world reject them. They have to, it's self-defence!


Bump because it bears repeating.
 




David Perdue is so bad that it may not be worth typing out an On the Record [ok, I might if time permits].

His Life Time Freedom Index Score is 52% with a LOW OF 28%




Perdue supports a constitutional Balanced Budget Amendment [BBA]. [this is bad]


Foreign policy

In March 2017, Perdue co-sponsored the Israel Anti-Boycott Act, a bill that would make it a Federal Crime for Americans to encourage or participate in boycotts against Israel and Israeli settlements in the occupied Palestinian territories if protesting actions by the Israeli government.

In April 2018, Perdue signed a letter asking the Trump administration to respond to revelations that North Korea was supplying some components of chemical weapons in Syria.

In November 2019, at the White House's request, Perdue blocked a vote on recognizing the Armenian genocide.

In January 2020, Perdue expressed support for the US military's assassination of Iranian major general Qasem Soleimani by drone strike at the Baghdad International Airport.


Stock trading controversies

Further information: 2020 congressional insider trading scandal

During his time in office, Perdue was the Senate's most prolific trader of stocks, funds or shares, making almost one third of all trades among members, roughly equivalent to the combined sum of trades conducted by the second- to sixth-most active traders in the Senate. Many trades were in companies with interests in the committees Perdue sat on, including banks, cybersecurity firms, and defense firms. For example, as part of the Senate Banking Committee, he regularly traded in stock of the Regions Financial bank in 2017 and early 2018. During that period, Perdue co-sponsored a Senate bill that would reduce financial regulations on medium-sized banks such as Regions. His proposed deregulations became law in May 2018, and Region's stock had risen by 35% since Perdue bought its shares. Perdue's office maintains that all of his stock trading activities were conducted independently through his broker.

In January and February 2016, Perdue invested in Halyard stocks shortly before and after the Senate first held a hearing on the opioid epidemic in the United States. Halyard sold medical devices that could assist in providing alternatives to opioids. The stock was worth up to $150,000. Perdue sold the stock around seven months later, profiting between 33% and 54%. Perdue reiterated that his broker operated independently from him.

Shortly before becoming chairman of the Armed Services Subcommittee on Seapower in January 2019, with jurisdiction over the Navy, Perdue bought $190,000 of stock in BWX Technologies, which builds nuclear power components for submarines. Later, Perdue secured almost $5 billion in the 2020 National Defense Authorization Act to build Virginia-class nuclear submarines built with BWX parts. He profited between $15,000 and $50,000 (according to his financial filings) when he sold the shares while writing the bill. His office reiterated that he was not personally involved in the stock-trading decisions.

On January 23, 2020, Perdue directed his financial advisers to sell over $1 million in stock of the finance firm Cardlytics weeks before its shares fell significantly. Two days before the sale, Cardlytics's CEO sent Perdue an email mentioning "upcoming changes", then later said he had sent the email to the wrong person. The Department of Justice investigated this incident, and concluded that Perdue had not engaged in insider trading. After Cardlytics' shares fell, he bought between $200,000 and $500,000 of their shares in March; these shares more than quadrupled their value by November 2020.

On January 24, 2020, Perdue bought around $65,000 of stock in DuPont, a company that makes personal protective equipment, on the same day as a private Senate briefing on the spread of COVID-19. Over the next few months, he bought and sold around $5.8 million and $5.6 million worth of stocks, respectively. Perdue bought up to $245,000 in stocks of the pharmaceutical company Pfizer, and sold up to $165,000 in stocks of the casino Caesars Entertainment, which closed its doors during the pandemic. His stock-trading activity sharply increased in March 2020. In May 2020, after his portfolio was scrutinized, Perdue announced that his financial advisers would no longer buy and sell individual stocks. He was criticized for his stock-trading during the coronavirus pandemic, with allegations of insider trading. Perdue has said advisers made the trades without his influence.

Perdue has asserted that the Senate Ethics Committee investigated the incident and in June 2020 privately concluded that it "did not find evidence that [Perdue's] actions violated federal law, Senate Rules, or standards of conduct". But as of December 2020, the Ethics Committee has not disclosed such an investigation.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Perdue
 
I stumbled upon a very interesting tidbit about much of the incoming Trump administration. Many of the selections share an affinity for a gentleman named Curtis Yarvin (aka Moldbug something-or-other) and his philosophy of "authoritarian libertarianism". The more I look into him and his philosophy the more all of these Cabinet picks make sense and it's a good bet that some close version of Yarvin's philosophy is what will be implemented. It all tracks very closely. It is essentially technocratic elites controlling anything and everything in the political, installing a dictator, while being libertarian in all other matters (social issues, drugs, etc)

Definitely worth a read: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curtis_Yarvin
 
Last edited:
I stumbled upon a very interesting tidbit about much of the incoming Trump administration. Many of the selections share an affinity for a gentleman named Curtis Yarvin (aka Moldbug something-or-other) and his philosophy of "authoritarian libertarianism". The more I look into him and his philosophy the more all of these Cabinet picks make sense and it's a good bet that some close version of Yarvin's philosophy is what will be implemented. It all tracks very closely. It is essentially technocratic elites controlling anything and everything in the political, installing a dictator, while being libertarian in all other matters (social issues, drugs, etc)

Definitely worth a read: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curtis_Yarvin

https://unlimitedhangout.com/2021/0...s/the-father-the-son-and-the-mencius-moldbug/

Curtis Yarvin, a far-right blogger writing under the alias Mencius Moldbug, has acted as a disruptor for decades and has amassed a very loyal following in doing so. Yarvin is different from most other bloggers, in that his followers include powerful figures in US politics and the US intelligence community, like Peter Thiel. His past calls for a military coup in the US and his campaign RAGE (Retirement of All Government Employees) have brought his work notoriety, but his deep ties to individuals enmeshed with the national security state make him an essential figure to examine and scrutinize. Oddly enough, in examining Yarvin’s own family connections, it becomes clear that his ties to the national security state go far beyond his closeness to figures like Peter Thiel and other authoritarianism enthusiasts who publicly masquerade as “libertarian.”

much more at link. Very important info to know.

----------------------------------------


“Mark McAfee, a California raw milk producer whose products have been recalled several times recently due to bird flu contamination, said he has been approached by Robert F Kennedy Jr’s team to guide the upcoming administration on raw milk policy.

Experience with bird flu, eh? Probably nothing.....
 
Last edited:
President Donald Trump has revealed something very important to those who fully understand the nature and construct of the DC Silo system. An outside government “Intelligence Advisory Board,” perhaps the ultimate cross-silo information system.

President-Trump-Devin-Nunes-1.jpg


The approach of an Intelligence Advisory Board has the possibility to fracture the mechanism used by the DC Intelligence Community to isolate the president.

Within the various intel agencies, they use a process of building silos of information that are not shared outside the origination agency unless certain rules are followed. This is a mechanism to retain control.

One of these control mechanisms is found in the classification process. Each agency (colloquially called a ‘stakeholder’) has unilateral control over their unique contribution to a collective document or intelligence product. Unless every stakeholder agrees to the declassification, the intel product is withheld and remains “siloed”. That’s just one example, there are hundreds more.

An Intelligence Advisory Board is essentially the Bullshit Calling Committee, that can help the President determine which parts of the intelligence information are factually likely and which parts are transparently political.
NOVEMBER 14th REMINDER:

Almost every day an intelligence community overview assessment is compiled, it’s called the Presidential Daily Briefing or PDB.

The PDB contains content primarily produced by the CIA. However, in the modern era, the PDB is assembled and enhanced by adding information from other intelligence agencies (silos). The Director of National Intelligence assembles it; the position Tulsi Gabbard has recently been nominated for.

The DNI (now Tulsi) compiles the information, then delivers the PDB to the President, the National Security Advisor (now Mike Waltz) and the list of people assigned by the President to review it.

The PDB is the Intelligence Community (IC) telling the Office of the President, this is what’s going on. The PDB frames the worldview of the CIA and other agencies.

However, if the CIA/IC wants to frame policy and action to their agenda – and not to the agenda of the president/administration per se’ – the CIA/IC can shape the PDB information toward their own individual objectives. In the past several decades the CIA manipulation of the PDB became obvious.

Because the PDB was no longer considered to be an “independent” finding of fact, and was/is, instead, more of a CIA tool to shape and control the president, it became increasingly useless.

President Obama saw the traps within the CIA/IC use of the PDB and started to ignore it. Obama gave the PDB to almost two-dozen administration officials daily, essentially saying, “here this is what the CIA say is going on – check it out.” Meanwhile Obama did what he wanted to do in shaping policy, often regardless of the PDB content.

With an incoming President Trump administration, the CIA/IC use of the PDB to manipulate outcomes will be even more on display.

With that in mind, here’s one approach that might be worth considering.

Make the CIA/IC (now Ratcliffe/Tulsi) provide a footnote for every assertion of fact within the PDB.

Put the footnotes into a classified appendix that includes sources and methods and give the appendix only to the National Security Advisor, now Mike Waltz. [ie. ‘Review and return’]

Let NSA Mike Waltz then review the attributions of source material in the White House SCIF. Then, if any concerns are noted, Waltz can turn to the National Security Council with a generalized statement describing the concern saying, “check this out.”

The NSC can then dig into the granular details and return with their own independent assessment about the validity of the information.

The National Security Advisor, Mike Waltz, can then go question the specific CIA/IC silo about any contradiction that might be at issue.

Do this enough times, and I predict the PDB will quickly change in both tone and content. The originators of the intelligence assessment, the CIA and other agencies, will be on notice that their homework is being checked by the National Security Council.

…. Or maybe, the President’s Intelligence Advisory Board!

Just a thought.

https://theconservativetreehouse.co...dvisory-board-headed-by-chairman-devin-nunes/
 



Devin Nunes average Freedom Index Score is 54% with lows of 32%.

He voted YES on Militarizing Local Police, Electronic Surveillance, Military Tribunals, Iran Military Operations, Foreign Aid, Patriot Act, Labor-HHS-Education Appropriations, Head Start Funding, CAFTA, CISPA, and plenty more "I love INTRUSIVE and BIG Growth Government".


Let me know if you want me to do a Record sheet on him showing all of the ways he helps to destroy our liberties.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top