You know I have family who have been and are deployed abroad, and any compromise of their security ought to be tried with charges of treason. However, I, like few others arguing here, have read and continue to read the reports and there apears to be no security compromise what so ever. Its mostly as I predicted when I first heard of the leaks. (here is an abridged mock sample) If you want the real deal you know where to go:
Date: June 18th, 2007
Killed Wounded
0 US 1 US
6 Taliban 0 Taliban
4 Civilians 12 Civilians
0 Allies 0 Allies
coordinates: x,y
Summary:
There was a fray in the streets, multiple civilians caught in crossfire. Targets neutralized.
____________________________
believe it or not, the above doesn't really compromise security any more than google earth or the general media to begin with. Many more are even less revealing than that, reporting grafiti or propoganda posted on a mosque... thats not much of a security compromise either. I truley believe, that unless your amoung the federal beurocracy or military operation leaders saving face, anyone who reads these documents will release how silly it is to assume any true security risk to our soldiers.