The Scientific Polls Are Corrupt

[Sal Collaziano]

This was a comment from somebody on posting at this CNN discussion.

The “scientific” polls are NOT scientific. I know this because when the pollsters called me they only mentioned the candidates that they already expected to win.

If you mention “Ron Paul” the questioner wasn’t even told he was a candidate.

They’re slanting the statistics.

Posted By Joel, Highlands Ranch, Colorado : June 7, 2007 7:09 pm

Any thoughts? If this is true, what can be done about it?

 

[mvent2]

Don't bother with them, the only poll that counts is the Primaries. The best you can do is keep advertising Dr Paul wherever, whenever and however you can.

 

[Therion]

Jesse Ventura didn't need any stinking polls.

 

[Bob Cochran]

Yeah...I still make fun of my dad and brothers in Minnesota for letting Jesse Ventura become gov of MN.

 

[SeanEdwards]

Yeah...I still make fun of my dad and brothers in Minnesota for letting Jesse Ventura become gov of MN.

Heh, I thought Jesse Ventura was kinda cool.

 

[Bob Cochran]

JV was all right, but when he said "churches are for the weak-minded", I parted ways. He never displayed signs of a towering intellect, so who is he to speak of the weak-minded?

I have a nephew from the same part of Minnesota as Jesse V who sounds EXACTLY like him. It's funny.