speaking off the record: It's kind of insane how many people think the "proper role of government is to protect the rights of the individual," and yet the fact that for the institution to exist, it must then necessarily have a moral right to tax you without your consent doesn't seem to pose any inherent contradictions for them...
Government is a place bad men go to control you, and they've tricked all your friends into thinking we need them.
Your definition of government is confusing to me. What you describe is an oligarchy of rulers who control others while exempting themselves from the law. That is not the proper role of government. Proper government is necessary to protect property, liberty, and peace. That is why I quoted Mises. He understood that.
"This is the function that the liberal doctrine assigns to the state: the protection of property, liberty, and peace." - Ludwig von Mises
Government protects individual's property by establishing standards and keeping them static over time. We can't use
Wikipedia as a governing document because people can change the defintions or wording. If someone sells you a bushel of wheat it should weigh 60 lbs at 13.5% moisture. If you know that when you make the trade, then the seller can't sell you 59 lbs of wheat and cheat you out of a pound of flour. You can prove in court or in arbitration what the standard is.
Same for liter, meter, gallon, acre, Eagle, and Dollar, on & on, etc. Standards are governing documents. Standards can be created by the free market, but they must remain static or else cheating becomes the order of the day. That is exactly what we endure today. We have a lack of government keeping the Dollar standard static. In 1792, the
Dollar was codified as 371.25 grains of pure silver. It was
usurped in 1861 by counterfeiters. If government had not allowed the Dollar standard to be ignored, then the inflation tax would be virtually nonexistent and it is by far the most expensive tax collected by the counterfeiting Oligarchy today.
Laws are also required to state that no one can go around killing someone else without due process. When that is ignored then peace is no longer protected. Again, that is the problem we endure today. A guy named Barack Obama or people imitating government servants in blue uniforms can kill anyone they want without due process or punishment. Ignoring the Constitution delivers same result as not having a Constitution.
Prosperity comes from the land. It can be mined, grown, or sewn. One can dig for gold, oil, or whatever on their land. Or one can raise food, fibers for clothing, or plastics, etc. Or one could build a factory and make airplanes on their land. But land has to have boundaries which require records and land laws in order to settle boundary disputes and other property issues. Whither that is done publicly or privately makes no difference, it is still governing documents used to settle disputes ... just like contract law.
If the 'Bill of Rights' was strictly respected, then the government would be protecting property, liberty, and peace. When people claim that we don't need any government at all, I say, that is about what we have now.