The Politicians We Can Trust

GunnyFreedom said:
Thanks for trusting me enough to do that. I don't trust Jones as much as Paul, since he is not originally a Pauler-platform but a convert, but he is right up there IMHO. He is definitely top-5 in my book, and in that environment, that's a tough road to hoe.
Click to expand...

I agree and you're welcome.

Hopefully we can force to put Paul's amendment up for vote and pass it.
 
Brian4Liberty said:
Once again, if you are talking fiscal matters, Tom McClintock from California is not the worst...
Click to expand...

he's squishy next to Ron. I liked him until I learned about Ron. In 2008 he said Ron did not have 'presidential caliber' then immediately after the election sought Ron's endorsement, and got it and that is the reason he carried his district.
 
Reading through this thread I see one glaring problem. You are focusing solely on who votes with RP 100% of the time essentially. By doing so, you are holding everyone up to a standard that is nearly impossible to reach, and by doing so you fail to see the bigger picture.

Politics is about building coalitions around specific pieces of legislation. So when you look at the major issues that face us today, you can build coaltions with like-minded people on specific issues at hand. For example, when it comes to economic policies there are many people that vote the way we would want them to vote. For FP issues, there is another group. For civil liberty issues, there is another group.

If you whittle a list down with such a narrow definition of "who can we trust" you are going to eventually arrive at the conclusion that no one can be trusted, and you will withdraw yourself from the process. However, if you look at the big picture you can see that there are many people who we can work with and advance our issues if we don't become so hyper fixated on everyone being 100% pure on 100% of the issues.
 
I disagree, and so far this thread has shown that there is a handful of guys that we can trust. Hopefully in the near future more can be added. This should be a sticky.
 
You might want to take a look at Bob Fanning, a candidate for Governor of Montana. I know him personally, he is smart and committed to freedom. He wants to kick the Feds back to their Ten Square Mile Constitutionally chartered territory. He wants the people of Montana to decide Montana's future. He is a strong supporter of Ron Paul, a Constitutionalist, a member of Oath Keepers, and a man who supports sound money and the Constitutional Militia.

Shorty Dawkins
 
tbone717 said:
Reading through this thread I see one glaring problem. You are focusing solely on who votes with RP 100% of the time essentially. By doing so, you are holding everyone up to a standard that is nearly impossible to reach, and by doing so you fail to see the bigger picture.

Politics is about building coalitions around specific pieces of legislation. So when you look at the major issues that face us today, you can build coaltions with like-minded people on specific issues at hand. For example, when it comes to economic policies there are many people that vote the way we would want them to vote. For FP issues, there is another group. For civil liberty issues, there is another group.

If you whittle a list down with such a narrow definition of "who can we trust" you are going to eventually arrive at the conclusion that no one can be trusted, and you will withdraw yourself from the process. However, if you look at the big picture you can see that there are many people who we can work with and advance our issues if we don't become so hyper fixated on everyone being 100% pure on 100% of the issues.
Click to expand...

No it is about weeding out the politicians that actually care about us from the NWO puppets.
 
Shorty Dawkins said:
You might want to take a look at Bob Fanning, a candidate for Governor of Montana. I know him personally, he is smart and committed to freedom. He wants to kick the Feds back to their Ten Square Mile Constitutionally chartered territory. He wants the people of Montana to decide Montana's future. He is a strong supporter of Ron Paul, a Constitutionalist, a member of Oath Keepers, and a man who supports sound money and the Constitutional Militia.

Shorty Dawkins
Click to expand...

Thank you. After the elections I will be looking into all the new politicians.
 
Paul Broun should be added to this list. He's a Constitutionalist who votes "no" with Ron when all the other house members vote "yes."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

PAF
Don’t Trust the Voters
Replies
6
Views
59
CCTelander
C
PAF
Just Six US House Members Vote Against Sending Israel Another Half Billion Dollars in Military Aid
Replies
7
Views
63
Anti Federalist
Anti Federalist
jmdrake
Rand Paul introduces "REINS" act to rein in the administrative state
Replies
13
Views
2K
Occam's Banana
Occam's Banana
J
Illegal 24/7 Search Without a Warrant Facial Recognition Surveillance in UK. Coming Here
2
Replies
20
Views
2K
RJB
RJB
Swordsmyth
"Today we are announcing we are removing pharma members from FDA advisory committees"
Replies
0
Views
11
Swordsmyth
Swordsmyth
Back
Top