The Peace Candidate - Lincoln Chafee

Richard Spencer is on a whole different level than just Taki Magazine and Jack Hunter. He was one of the people dumping all over people like Matt Bevin and Tim Huelskamp for having mixed race families. That is despicable. Here is his Wikipedia. Would you cite a guy like this?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_B._Spencer
I disagree with Richard Spencer. How about Vdare, pretty much the same group as Taki. Named after the first white woman born in America. Virginia Dare!
 
Richard Spencer is on a whole different level than just Taki Magazine and Jack Hunter. He was one of the people dumping all over people like Matt Bevin and Tim Huelskamp for having mixed race families. That is despicable. Here is his Wikipedia. Would you cite a guy like this?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_B._Spencer

I'm not terribly familiar with Spencer apart from his association with Taki's Magazine, but if he is literally that big on the issue of race mixing, he's too extreme for my taste. I come from a mixed white and Lakota Sioux background, so despite my strong misgivings regarding the deliberate attempts by Frankfurt School Critical Theory types to destroy all distinct culture from the world, I can't really condone a guy like Spencer. I wouldn't take an African, Asian or Mestizo wife out of preference and ease of potential extended family tension, but it's not a litmus test for me unless the person starts advertising it as some sort of badge of honor and tries to coerce others into doing it.
 
Where did you go Sola Fide? I'll leave you with this. If you look at my earlier stuff on the Paul's associations you shall see a connection. If you cannot connect the dots then Wendy McElory's piece will. http://www.wendymcelroy.com/news.php?extend.1299

Rand's goose is gonna be cooked:
PAUL: I like the Civil Rights Act in the sense that it ended discrimination in all public domains, and I’m all in favor of that.

INTERVIEWER: But?

PAUL: You had to ask me the "but." I don't like the idea of telling private business owners — I abhor racism. I think it’s a bad business decision to exclude anybody from your restaurant — but, at the same time, I do believe in private ownership. But I absolutely think there should be no discrimination in anything that gets any public funding, and that’s most of what I think the Civil Rights Act was about in my mind.

INTERVIEWER: But under your philosophy, it would be okay for Dr. King not to be served at the counter at Woolworth’s?

PAUL: I would not go to that Woolworths, and I would stand up in my community and say that it is abhorrent, um, but, the hard part — and this is the hard part about believing in freedom — is, if you believe in the First Amendment, for example — you have to, for example, most good defenders of the First Amendment will believe in abhorrent groups standing up and saying awful things and uh, we're here at the bastion of newspaperdom, I'm sure you believe in the First Amendment so you understand that people can say bad things.It’s the same way with other behaviors. In a free society, we will tolerate boorish people, who have abhorrent behavior, but if we're civilized people, we publicly criticize that, and don't belong to those groups, or don't associate with those people.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...b8d91c4-a235-11e2-82bc-511538ae90a4_blog.html

They know he does have previous associations with those people. I pointed out to you much of the whole sha-bang. He just doesn't want to tell private business owners what to do and so does Richard Spencer I would think. However in his piece criticizing Rand and talking positively towards Trump (I wonder why... we know why.. immigration that is changing America's demographics) he asked what was the point? I think it has something to do with bringing in the money bombs and handing supporters over to the Republican party clean of any illusions of ending the Empire (which would go against Republican parties state socialism/corporatism aka militarism). I can't imagine the movement 8 years ago people taking Donald Trump, Ted Cruz seriously. They wanted to end the Empire not run it.

I hope this thread illuminates those who can accept a very imperfect peace candidate in Chafee if they must vote at all. Agorism is a very acceptable position. I hope would be supporters of Rand read it to get a feel for the how wide ranged and varied the movement around Paul is before they decide to further enrich Paul Inc. I hope his supporters carefully go through this stuff and be prepared to stand with Rand when the storm comes. Because it will come. These associations will be brought up in the most sensationalist way. Rand will need some help eating his own words. I think bigotry is common even among those who will attack Rand. Some of it is easier to see than others. It seems they all have "an other" whom they demonize. Perhaps that should be researched and prepared for the upcoming battle.
 
Are you a staffer for Rachel Maddow?
No. I don't like her. I'm just someone who supports Ron Paul's message on ending the Empire and ending the Fed. I am just amazed at how polite some of the people are here that I wanted to dispel some of their illusions. I'm a former Rand supporter. I stood with Rand. He walked away from me. I still look at times to see if he will comeback, but nope, he won't. It maybe shocking to some but Ron and Dennis Kucinich are buddies. Dennis is a socialist. He is on the advisory board at Ron Paul's Institute: http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/about-us.aspx

Now if I said Dennis was a good man. I'd be treated kindly here. I'd be overwhelmed with the detailed knowledge of him and his positions. I don't agree with much of his positions but he is a good man. I wish he was running again. I wish Ron was. Hell, I'd take Pat Buchanan. They all have aspects of them I wish weren't there but they are generally decent humans. They know what is right and stand up for it. They all know that mission number #1 is to end the Empire!
 
So you don't like Antiwar.com, the American Conservative, the National Interest, the Financial Times, Lobelog, mondoweiss, counterpunch, Unz, asiatimes, RT, Drudge, etc? I guess nothing beats Dondero does it sunshine: http://www.libertarianrepublican.net/

Dondero is a statist. Why are you linking him to me. I thought we already established that I believe in less state than you (none).
 
Dondero is a statist. Why are you linking him to me. I thought we already established that I believe in less state than you (none).
Because you remind me of him. You guys are still close. He is a libertarian. He is against ending the Empire too ;)
 
We all get it here...Rand is not a libertarian and he is not a non-interventionist. You can read my posts critiquing Rand and I agree with all the articles critiquing him from a non-interventionist perspective.

Let me say it in big letters so you read it: RAND IS NOT A LIBERTARIAN AND NOT A NON-INTERVENTIONIST. All of us here understand this.

Many of us here are philosophical libertarians and we barely participate in politics. You don't need to get on your high horse and rail against Rand's deviations from libertarianism. We all know them. We get it.
 
We all get it here...Rand is not a libertarian and he is not a non-interventionist. You can read my posts critiquing Rand and I agree with all the articles critiquing him from a non-interventionist perspective.

Let me say it in big letters so you read it: RAND IS NOT A LIBERTARIAN AND NOT A NON-INTERVENTIONIST. All of us here understand this.

Many of us here are philosophical libertarians and we barely participate in politics. You don't need to get on your high horse and rail against Rand's deviations from libertarianism. We all know them. We get it.
You are right he isn't a libertarian, he is not a non-interventionist. He is just a run of the mill republican living off his father's success. You brought it on yourself. I was just going to quickly mention a candidate and go for individuals who were left standing by Rand. Who wanted someone who spoke their mind and was better than most on foreign policy (even how terrible the guy is) and could educate people on talking to ones enemies and supported the Iran deal. The guy isn't going to win. Neither of them are. I guess you inspired me to put things in perspective for those who didn't know the different crowds libertarians run in and where Rachel Maddow will attack. Where Jennifer Rubin will attack.

So what do you get out of this? Why are you here on this board? What does a person who isn't a libertarian and isn't going to win do for you?
 
You are right he isn't a libertarian, he is not a non-interventionist. He is just a run of the mill republican living off his father's success. You brought it on yourself. I was just going to quickly mention a candidate and go for individuals who were left standing by Rand. Who wanted someone who spoke their mind and was better than most on foreign policy (even how terrible the guy is) and could educate people on talking to ones enemies and supported the Iran deal. The guy isn't going to win. Neither of them are. I guess you inspired me to put things in perspective for those who didn't know the different crowds libertarians run in and where Rachel Maddow will attack. Where Jennifer Rubin will attack.

So what do you get out of this? Why are you here on this board? What does a person who isn't a libertarian and isn't going to win do for you?

You just repeated what I said. Rand is not a libertarian and he is not a non-interventionist.

Are you going to repeat it again like us imbeciles here don't already know this? Or are you going to enlighten us all genius?
 
You just repeated what I said. Rand is not a libertarian and he is not a non-interventionist.

Are you going to repeat it again like us imbeciles here don't already know this? Or are you going to enlighten us all genius?
I was agreeing with what you said. You are such a nice person by the way. I think your motivation here is just to troll people and run them off the board. You don't have much to say. Also who is us? I only see you posting. Am I being tag teamed under that alias? I'm being trolled by committee.
 
Back
Top