The Official Alt Right Thread

[AmericanSpartan]

Where are my follow agents of reclamation and restoration of Liberty, Culture, and Tradition?

 

[AuH20]

I generally like what the Alt Right brings to the table, but some veer off into no man's land with the race stuff. Culture > Race in my eyes.

 

[AmericanSpartan]

I generally like what the Alt Right brings to the table, but some veer off into no man's land with the race stuff. Culture > Race in my eyes.

You can not and will not have a free and prosperous society with people with sub 100 IQ but nothing.

 

[AmericanSpartan]

An hour 42 onword really does sum it up.

 

[tod evans]

You can not and will not have a free and prosperous society with people with sub 100 IQ but nothing.

^^^^^^^^^ So speaketh the oracle ^^^^^^^^^^^

 

[Voluntarist]

xxxxx

 

[presence]

Negros are an obsolete race. They can serve no purpose. While they were, like all low IQ people, at one time useful as dumb labor, technology has long since made them non-economical. The world in general would be better off if they went extinct.


how am I doing?

 

[otherone]

Where are my follow agents of reclamation and restoration of Liberty, Culture, and Tradition?

 

[AuH20]

You can not and will not have a free and prosperous society with people with sub 100 IQ but nothing.

Organizing a society on the principle of IQ and IQ alone sets a very dangerous precedent. Under your regime, Ashkenazi jews would be at the top of the caste system, since they boast the highest IQ in the world. Did you ever arrive at the logical conclusion that a group smarter than yourself could theoretically raise the benchmark higher to say 135 and consequently deem you as subhuman as well?

 

[phill4paul]

Kill blacks, kill gays, kill sub 100 IQ'ers, wooohoo this is some kinda freedom forums.

 

[Origanalist]

You can not and will not have a free and prosperous society with people with sub 100 IQ but nothing.

Lol, "but nothing"? Someone with such a high IQ should be able to write a clear and concise sentence.

 

[specsaregood]

Organizing a society on the principle of IQ and IQ alone sets a very dangerous precedent. Under your regime, Ashkenazi jews would be at the top of the caste system, since they boast the highest IQ in the world. Did you ever arrive at the logical conclusion that a group smarter than yourself could theoretically raise the benchmark higher to say 135 and consequently deem you as subhuman as well?

The alt-right cucks are perfectly fine with being in the middle of the pyramid, they just don't want to be at the bottom. In fact, they probably welcome it as they want to be ruled by big daddy telling them where to go and how to do it.

 

[presence]

Organizing a society on the principle of IQ and IQ alone sets a very dangerous precedent. Under your regime, Ashkenazi jews would be at the top of the caste system, since they boast the highest IQ in the world.

To be fair, a life of study of the Talmud is to a typical IQ test; as spending your life studying Barron's test prep is to taking the SAT: Relative to the common unread man, the Ashkenazi are silently cheating.

 

[Todd]

You can not and will not have a free and prosperous society with people with sub 100 IQ but nothing.

There is one race. Everything else is tribalism. And culture/status/and access to education have a lot to with how intelligent people are. You people who think genetic makeup has anything to do with a culture's ability to harness brain power are absolutely ignorant.

 

[Voluntarist]

xxxxx

 

[AuH20]

OP, please read.

http://www.newyorker.com/tech/frontal-cortex/why-smart-people-are-stupid

For more than five decades, Daniel Kahneman, a Nobel Laureate and professor of psychology at Princeton, has been asking questions like this and analyzing our answers. His disarmingly simple experiments have profoundly changed the way we think about thinking. While philosophers, economists, and social scientists had assumed for centuries that human beings are rational agents—reason was our Promethean gift—Kahneman, the late Amos Tversky, and others, including Shane Frederick (who developed the bat-and-ball question), demonstrated that we’re not nearly as rational as we like to believe.

When people face an uncertain situation, they don’t carefully evaluate the information or look up relevant statistics. Instead, their decisions depend on a long list of mental shortcuts, which often lead them to make foolish decisions. These shortcuts aren’t a faster way of doing the math; they’re a way of skipping the math altogether. Asked about the bat and the ball, we forget our arithmetic lessons and instead default to the answer that requires the least mental effort.

Too bad we can't test for wisdom as opposed to something as singular as IQ.

 

[cajuncocoa]

//

 

[CaptUSA]

When people face an uncertain situation, they don’t carefully evaluate the information or look up relevant statistics. Instead, their decisions depend on a long list of mental shortcuts, which often lead them to make foolish decisions. These shortcuts aren’t a faster way of doing the math; they’re a way of skipping the math altogether. Asked about the bat and the ball, we forget our arithmetic lessons and instead default to the answer that requires the least mental effort.

But the assumption here is that those shortcuts aren't rational in themselves. People will skip the math when they think it doesn't matter to them. That is a rational response as well. Unfortunately, those same people have been brainwashed into believing that they should be voting.

 

[Cabal]

My thoughts on the alt right, and generally anything that the douchebag OP has to say on just about any subject:

 

[cajuncocoa]

//