Then worst case scenario is that the surviving alts meet parity with each other. I think there is enough Quadrillions in the central banker economy to spread among early Bitcoin, early Litecoin and early Namecoin users to make all holders the new elite if the 100% deflationary experiment works.
That's a real reason for investment. My numbers don't come out quite the same. But what, I'm trying to calculate better than a world of economists who have had a chance to get in, and are saying bitcoin is worth about 1,000 USD, including its value as a speculation instrument? If I get in now I'm betting I can make my life easier or better using it, or others will, or I can get out at the right time, or PROFIT. It is only my clear moral superiority which makes the latter so enticing
One of them will survive. Possibly 5 of them. Possibly 10 of them. But most will consolidate and eat each other alive.
I am just as certain. What are your thoughts (anyone's) on the odds of an eventual virtual monopoly, duopoly, etc? What odds that #1 crypto does not exist? Odds that eventual #1 released by central bankers and adopted by the masses ala groupon? These kind of question marks make my prospects of getting out at the right time dubious.
The Bitcoin protocol saving 2.5% is actually a very big deal. Doritos removes a few chips and adds air to save 0.1%.
You're right, but btc is open source. Business that move money around will make proprietary. So you're still right, but it's not like 'every business will eventually adopt', in terms of investment calculation.
You can send a billion $$$ to the other side of the world instantly for 9 cents. You don't find that interesting?
I do. How often will people need that? I would guess approximately often enough to make btc worth $1000 right now. So what am I really betting on?
Capital controls can't hold back business anymore. Sanction lines in the sand mean nothing now. The utility value of Bitcoin is here to stay.
I agree 100%, the utility value is not zero. But it must be less than the current price, because of illusory speculation. The intelligence of this market is notably high. It has determined, all things considered, $1,000.
I guess I'd have to know: Can btc literally implement any other possible innovation? Can btc survive central banker's best attempt at competition (plus media frenzy... the msm spam game)?
And the smartest techs and economists in the world think the odds of that make btc worth about 1,000 right now. Unless they plan to get out at the right time. Before I see them do it.
And if people don't see that they are going to miss a huge boat.
BTC just needs to eventually stabilize above $1000 eventually, for the patient.
Could Bitcoin fatally fail 2-3 years from now in the code? Possibly.
Really. Links to people who think it will, please! Other than the Krug. And what's this about blockchain bloat? Transaction times already suck, or is that just my computer?