The leaked Esptein emails are a bombshell!

People of goodwill can agree that corrupt pedos should go to prison

Nobody should go to prison unless they are found guilty of a crime thats how justice works you are innocent until proven guilty.

Unsubstantiated and unverified claims by untrusted sources don't amount to evidence.
 
Are you equating "justice" with the "justice system"??

I certainly don't believe our system is perfect but we don't live in a banana republic.

The goal of absolute perfect justice is the purest and most important goal of our civilization though.
 
I certainly don't believe our system is perfect but we don't live in a banana republic.

The goal of absolute perfect justice is the purest and most important goal of our civilization though.

6915fc7057f33.webp
 
Nobody should go to prison unless they are found guilty of a crime thats how justice works you are innocent until proven guilty.

Unsubstantiated and unverified claims by untrusted sources don't amount to evidence.

Nobody argued for punishment without just prosecution but Trump. He's killing people on boats leaving Venezuela under the claim they are transporting drugs. The only way a just prosecution can go forward is for evidence to be released.

strawman​

You misrepresented someone's argument to make it easier to attack.​

By exaggerating, misrepresenting, or just completely fabricating someone's argument, it's much easier to present your own position as being reasonable, but this kind of dishonesty serves to undermine honest rational debate.

Example: After Will said that we should put more money into health and education, Warren responded by saying that he was surprised that Will hates our country so much that he wants to leave it defenceless by cutting military spending.

Want to share this fallacy on Facebook? Here's a button for you:
LOL
 
Nobody argued for punishment without just prosecution but Trump. He's killing people on boats leaving Venezuela under the claim they are transporting drugs.

Our intelligence agencies are the best in the world.

A president's war powers aren't a criminal investigation.

Foreign policy is article 2 of our constitution not article 3.

Nations of the world are by definition outlaws to one another.

There is no justice argument against war when you are defending your national security.

Its our presidents duty to designate and destroy foreign enemies of our state. Thats the sole purpose of the "executive" branch.
 
The timing of the information releases is interesting.

In the UK, there was an Epstein release right after they advocated for a Palestinian State.
 
Let's be honest, it's like 2 people.

The vast majority of us do not worship Satan.
I don't worship Satan.

I just understand there is a rule of law in our country and there is only one ruler that we recognize that is our law our constitution and the law orders the president of the United States to defend our national security.

Thats the presidents job even if the other nation or people are doing whats best for their people or are perceived as innocent because it has nothing to do with God or Satan we don't live in a theocracy.
 
I don't worship Satan.

I just understand there is a rule of law in our country and there is only one ruler that we recognize that is our law our constitution and the law orders the president of the United States to defend our national security.

Thats the presidents job even if the other nation or people are doing whats best for their people or are perceived as innocent because it has nothing to do with God or Satan we don't live in a theocracy.
You actually do NOT believe in the rule of law as shown by you defending the coverup. Ghislaine Maxwell was already convicted and she should have finished her sentence in a maximum security prison. Also you are dishonestly hiding behind "national security" when this is a matter of simple crimes.
 
You actually do NOT believe in the rule of law as shown by you defending the coverup. Ghislaine Maxwell was already convicted and she should have finished her sentence in a maximum security prison. Also you are dishonestly hiding behind "national security" when this is a matter of simple crimes.

No actually because we don't have a ruler. So there's actually a rule of law.

The law isn't perfect neither are the people who execute the laws but its still preferable to a tyrannical monarchy.

If I dont like the people who are governing or the laws I can vote to change them.

I didn't like that marijuana was illegal and we voted to change that.

You can't do that in a monarchy or theocracy.

If your religion says you can't eat pork and you live in a theocracy then you just cannot eat bacon.
 
you are dishonestly hiding behind "national security" when this is a matter of simple crimes.

The difference is that in our system the law which is our sole ruler orders our government to defend our national security the only crime would be if the executive branch disobeyed this order.

We dont recognize any authority other than the law. There's simply NO authority other than our law which is the constitution.

When we elect our president we are choosing the person who executes our law and the 50 states that elect the president are responsible for transferring that power to the president to protect our national security.
 
What AI really needs at this stage is a fat dose of Darwin. Especially this one.

691585c178fed.webp
 
Trump is a lot of not so great things. But I don't believe he is a kiddy diddler.
 
Trump is a lot of not so great things. But I don't believe he is a kiddy diddler.

Whatever. But there's a fine line between seventeen and eighteen, and even that is enough to blackmail someone into defending child traffickers.

In any case, even the die hards now realize Trump is perfectly willing to "play ball" with anyone, including them.
 
Whatever. But there's a fine line between seventeen and eighteen, and even that is enough to blackmail someone into defending child traffickers.

In any case, even the die hards now realize Trump is perfectly willing to "play ball" with anyone, including them.

Honestly, I think it's more the Clintons behind the push to keep the Epstein files private than Trump. I guess we'll see.
 
Back
Top