The leaked Esptein emails are a bombshell!

jmdrake

Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2007
Messages
52,907
What do we know so far?

1) Trump lied when he said he revoked Epstein's membership as Epstein was never a member.

2) Trump knew about the girls being trafficked while it was happening.

3) Trump maintained a friendship with Epstein after knowing he was a pedophile.

4) Epstein privately alleged that Epstein spent "hours" with one of the girls though he didn't say what Trump did.

5) Epstein and writer Michael Wolf privately discussed what campaign advice to give Donald Trump if Trump's relationship with Epstein ever became an issue in 2016.

6) Epstein claimed to have continued influence with Trump into the first Trump administration.

7) The Prince Andrew photo is authentic. (This was probably leaked to the royal family earlier which explains why the finally stripped him of his title and kicked him out of his castle.)

Now, the ardent Trump defenders and water carriers will tell you "That doesn't prove Trump raped any of Epstein's sex slaves." That's a straw man argument. Nobody ever claimed that it did. But the fake argument made by the Trump water carriers that Trump is some kind of "hero" in this story is fully undermined as a lie. Also note that while the rest of the world is talking about how Trump is implicated, FauxNews only is talking about Prince Andrew. Trump defenders will also say "But can you trust Jeffrey Epstein?" Well they have put their trust in Epstein's girlfriend / convict who has every reason to lie to stay in her "club fed" prison. Meanwhile Epstein's emails were off the record so what reason would he have had to lie then? Also this proves Elon Musk's tweet that "Trump's name is in the Epstein files" to be 100% accurate! His name clearly is in there. That said, under Florida law if Trump knew that Epstein was trafficking minors and did nothing, under Florida and federal law that by itself is not a crime. (I just did the analysis to be sure). Florida's "mandatory reporting" law only applies to child abuse with the abuser being narrowly defined as abuse by:
  • a parent
  • legal custodian
  • caregiver
  • or “other person responsible for the child’s welfare”
So under current Florida law there's more of a requirement for a teacher to report that a child came to school with welps on her leg than it is for an employer to report that a child employee is missing and is most likely a sex slave on a private island.



 
Seems like a bunch of fake news and nothing burgers.

Not even a real credible source of information.

None of its confirmed information through multiple verifiable sources.

Seems like it will be a repeat of all the other false allegations. We have seen this over and over with Russiagate using a phoney dossier.

After a while when you keep pretending to throw the ball even a dog is smart enough to stop chasing something thats not there.
 

Here's a news flash on how we all feel about how something "seems" to a machine:

691584409334b.webp
 
Seems like a bunch of fake news and nothing burgers.

Not even a real credible source of information.

None of its confirmed information through multiple verifiable sources.

Seems like it will be a repeat of all the other false allegations. We have seen this over and over with Russiagate using a phoney dossier.

After a while when you keep pretending to throw the ball even a dog is smart enough to stop chasing something thats not there.
LOL. I have you on ignore because you're obviously a troll. I had the late Swordy on ignore for the same reason. I only can see your nonsense if I choose to click on "show ignored user" when someone else responds to you like @acptulsa. This isn't "fake news." But enjoy your copium.
 
Seems like a bunch of fake news and nothing burgers.

Not even a real credible source of information.

None of its confirmed information through multiple verifiable sources.

Seems like it will be a repeat of all the other false allegations. We have seen this over and over with Russiagate using a phoney dossier.

After a while when you keep pretending to throw the ball even a dog is smart enough to stop chasing something thats not there.
Are the emails a hoax or do the emails prove that he didn't do anything?
 
Are the emails a hoax or do the emails prove that he didn't do anything?

Even if the emails weren't some sort of fake news propaganda designed to slide the news cycle away from the fact that the democrats just lost the government shutdown and went home with nothing and their party no longer has any political viability because Trump essentially destroyed the party of FDR which is the biggest political news story in 50 years.

I could have an email that I sent a friend that said I killed Jimmy Hoffa and he is buried in my back yard. That doesn't make it true.

The lead story is that the democrat party is dead.
 
Even if the emails weren't some sort of fake news propaganda designed to slide the news cycle away from the fact that the democrats just lost the government shutdown and went home with nothing and their party no longer has any political viability because Trump essentially destroyed the party of FDR which is the biggest political news story in 50 years.

I could have an email that I sent a friend that said I killed Jimmy Hoffa and he is buried in my back yard. That doesn't make it true.

The lead story is that the democrat party is dead.
So they're not fake but we should ignore them because they were purposely released?
 
So they're not fake but we should ignore them because they were purposely released?

Thats your take?

If you are going to paraphrase the argument I made atleast try to get it right.

I said unverified emails aren't evidence so its fake news.
 
LOL. I have you on ignore because you're obviously a troll. I had the late Swordy on ignore for the same reason. I only can see your nonsense if I choose to click on "show ignored user" when someone else responds to you like @acptulsa. This isn't "fake news." But enjoy your copium.
We don't care if you have him on ignore or not. Obviously you are not ignoring that member since you responded .

You have him on ignore because you were called out and couldn't back up your point. The ignore user is for the weak
 
If you are going to paraphrase the argument I made atleast try to get it right.

Why? When have you ever done the same for any of us? You've accused me of saying things I didn't more times than I can count. Everyone knows it's your modus operandi.

The Golden Rule, bot. If you don't live by it you get as good as you give. The rest of us know this because we were all born more than a year ago. Just because you were created being able to produce something that vaguely resembles English on a good day doesn't mean you aren't an infant, or that it doesn't show.
 
Last edited:
BBC, sounds legit.
I also linked to FauxNews and mentioned that. Faux chose to only focus on Prince Andrew, but that still shows the emails themselves are authentic and the Repulican operatives are only arguing about how this should be spun.
 
We don't care if you have him on ignore or not. Obviously you are not ignoring that member since you responded .

You have him on ignore because you were called out and couldn't back up your point. The ignore user is for the weak
LOL. Another troll that's on ignore. Ignore user isn't for the weak. It's for people who don't have time to argue with stupid trolls like yourself who lack the honesty and integrity to actually debate and just say the same stupid lies over and over again.

Edit: And thank you for reminding me why you're on ignore in the first place. You add nothing of value to this forum kind of like TIm Tebow added nothing of value to the NFL. And least with nickers I see other people responding to his nonsense even though it's still nonsense.
 
Last edited:
I also linked to FauxNews and mentioned that. Faux chose to only focus on Prince Andrew, but that still shows the emails themselves are authentic and the Repulican operatives are only arguing about how this should be spun.
This is happening all around, but I think it's probably a good thing. The Democrats are using it to go after Trump - that's the only reason it's even getting any attention in Congress. Good - keep it up!

I couldn't care less if it implicates Trump, but this class of elite thieves, pedos, and murderers deserves some transparency.
 
This is happening all around, but I think it's probably a good thing. The Democrats are using it to go after Trump - that's the only reason it's even getting any attention in Congress. Good - keep it up!

I couldn't care less if it implicates Trump, but this class of elite thieves, pedos, and murderers deserves some transparency.
People of goodwill can agree that corrupt pedos should go to prison. The video in post #3 in this thread is a leftist but she said the Democrats need to go after the Clintons to and she gave Patel and Bondi rare praise for them taking on the Clinton foundation in retaliation to the information coming out against Trump.
 
Back
Top