The IRS Isn’t Going Away, and This is How We Know

No they wouldn't. They would either secede and turn blue, or move to the blue states.

I don't see how that would make sense, but regardless, any secession is fine with me, blue red or otherwise
 
I don't see how that would make sense, but regardless, any secession is fine with me, blue red or otherwise

It makes perfect sense. If the voters in the red states alone wanted it done, they would have already. But they haven't. Even the anarchists like me who actually would do it are frowned upon and ridiculed by the so-called "right". Meaning, they will never put their money where their mouth is.

Face it, in today's new normal society, red is blue.
 
Guess always be an IRS if internal revenue is collected. Not sure peopla are aware of many different items in internal revenue , gasoline tax , deisel tax , wine tax . beer tax , tobacco taxes , liquor tax. 50 percent lndividual income tax , 9 percent from corporate tax, 2 percent exice taxes, 30 percent payroll taxes . Dont know missing 9 percent . I do know corporate tax is passed onto consumer
 
Yea but by that logic, red can't turn into blue because it already is

When you get right down to it, also taking their lack of supporting Rights [Bill of] into consideration, you're right.

The anti federalists are but an almost forgotten memory.
 
Nope. The fewer people paying taxes to the IRS, the better
I remember arguing with libertarians about Pence's Carrier crony tax cut and them saying that even if it was cronyism it was simply good that less taxes were being paid even if everyone else had to pay or or more debt was accrued.
I rightly pointed out that that was corruption and tyranny.

But now that a non-crony system is being set up so most people won't have to pay income taxes (on the way to eliminating them for everyone) that's suddenly "COMMUNISM".

Communism: when government stops stealing as much money from the vast majority of people and intrudes less in their lives????
 
So for example if only red states had to pay the income tax, that would be better?
No, but that's not what's happening here.
What is happening is based on economics not politics or any other arbitrary and targeted criteria.

Believe it or not, the rich actually can bear taxation better than the poor.
That is the truth the communists base their trap of progressive income taxes on.
Most people understand it instinctively and that attracts them to the communist argument.
But it seems libertarians like grinding the face of the poor.

One of the best things about consumption taxes like tariffs is that they naturally fall harder on the people who can afford to consume more while also being perfectly avoidable.
 
But now that a non-crony system is being set up so most people won't have to pay income taxes (on the way to eliminating them for everyone) that's suddenly "COMMUNISM".

Who said that? Putting your words in the mouths of others is still a forum violation.

You try to change the definition of progressive taxation. Spudea tries to change the definition of genocide. You people operate just exactly the same way Democrats, and all of you are just as big hypocrites.
 
Who said that? Putting your words in the mouths of others is still a forum violation.

You try to change the definition of progressive taxation. Spudea tries to change the definition of genocide. You people operate just exactly the same way Democrats, and all of you are just as big hypocrites.
So Trump wants to make the progressive income tax even more progressive?


Karl Marx's "10 Planks" to seize power and destroy freedom:

It's right there in black and white.

And I never changed the definition, I pointed out that Trump's plan made it less progressive on the way to eliminating it.
 
It's right there in black and white.

Yes. Proof you're ten times as big a communist as he is sits right there in black and white.

Once again your innate toxicity has led you to jump to a bullshit conclusion. And you're trying to twist the meaning of his words as surely as you tried to change the definition of "generation" in an attempt to twist something Rand Paul said into a meaningful compliment to Trump.

You're a piss poor propagandist. It would work better if you didn't insist on constantly attacking and insulting your target audience. You'll never be a better propagandist until you learn to kiss ass. And you're too toxic a megalomanic to do it. So what makes you stupid enough to keep trying?
 
Last edited:
Yes. Proof you're ten times as big a communist as he is sits right there in black and white.

Once again your innate toxicity has led you to jump to a bullshit conclusion. And you're trying to twist the meaning of his words as surely as you tried to change the definition of "generation" in an attempt to twist something Rand Paul said into a meaningful compliment to Trump.

You're a piss poor propagandist. It would work better if you didn't insist on constantly attacking and insulting your target audience. You'll never be a better propagandist until you learn to kiss ass. And you're too toxic a megalomanic to do it. So what makes you stupid enough to keep trying?
LOL
 

How nice that you managed to find someone to pay you so soon after being fired by the American people.

laughing-hard-kamala-laugh-elt48pgeztx0li36.webp
 
Problem with fed govt hasn't changed
You can't replace current govt spending with tariffs even if you exclude social security and Medicare
You'd have to get spending cuts
Spending cuts is what the fed govt has shown me they are unwilling to participate in. So our currency will collapse. MIT says 15 years , I say it's a good guess , figure a decade or two no more
 
It's pretty obvious to me that the hiring increase for the IRS is for the explicit purpose of getting rid of the IRS.

The IRS is quite large and he needs some help to shut it down
 
Back
Top