Jim, I realize that not everyone will agree with the merits of the project. But I explained our objectives with the site very clearly at the outset, and we've followed with those objectives - there shouldn't be any surprises if you've read the mission statement in the original post.
The donations we received funded the website and advertising in the college newspapers as I detailed, and I'm not intending to re-negotiate the plans for how I'm planning to spend that money now. It's a little late for that.
As far as the month's timeframe is concerned... There was one developer to handle everything - server installation, configuration, website organizational design, coding of the various modules needed for mapping and user search/sort, putting together the website, and other technical things not readily apparent to a normal user. In this time frame, it's not bad at all given just one developer worked on it. I don't know first thing about website development or design, but I had to invest considerable time to learn it on the fly and be able to jump in and help put things together. We're not robots, we have other commitments and our personal lives as well. Given the hurdles we had to overcome both personally and professionally and working as essentially a 2-person team, we're not doing too badly.
It's easier to criticize, Jim. Actually taking on a project like this and trying to meet expectations is a humbling experience when you're in a driver's seat.