The image microsoft doesn't want you to see

I use hyperbole a great deal, but the fact of the matter is you've already lined the evil person's pockets in these cases. My sincere apologies to anyone who might have wanted to pitch their computer out the window (though they wouldn't be able to read this) as a result. You did catch me on it, and I appreciate the levity.

It would be more accurate to say that you are not upgrading to a more ethical computer and OS and peripherals, but I'm not sure whose products those would be.

I am curious as to what companies are "fair" overseas, and what they pay. I'd also be curious as to whether those companies use any slave-labor products or components in their operations ;) What perfect companies are these, so that I may send them a "thank you" note via slave-free carrier pigeon?

The reason I brought up voting with one's dollars is that various people in this thread have bemoaned the horrible conditions, and talked about governmental "solutions" to the problem. I don't really see those as solutions. I see them as more bandaging to help people sleep better at night.

If you're supporting companies with better practices in their overseas plants, and are consciously researching such and up to speed with which are providing living wages and tangible benefits, then that's precisely what I've been talking about for quite a long time on the forums. It's to be commended. Please realize, though, that there are a whole lot of people who are looking to slam the regulations-hammer on companies because of half-information. Hell, even calling this "slave labor" is a misnomer. They're making minimum wage, which isn't great but it certainly isn't living on the street. Actually, they're living (and eating) on site instead :) Most minimum wage jobs in the United States don't really give you that option that I'm aware of, do they?

As for labeling... it was done quite a bit earlier in the thread, but not pertaining to those who are against these awful companies' practices.

From the Fair Trade website itself:



...which goes to my observation that these workers are being paid minimum wage and given optional overtime. The whole thread is much ado about nothing.

The lack of choices is a huge part of the problem. Which is why by naming and shaming you get the word to those who don't think about purchases until it confronts them. Then companies become inspired to develop a reputation that results in them being rewarded with customer loyalty.

The choice for primary products manufactured in an ethical (which is a debate unto itself) manner is tremendously small. However you must pick some starting point from which to operate or concede to letting the vultures win. I can't just accept the futility and not try personnally to change the little bit I can change.

I think you might be reading too much into any altruistic solution to the problem to find its shortcomings. Your analysis of the Free Trade website is an opinion. The fact that ridiculous overtime is not mandatory is a huge improvement over allowing global corporations to abuse them. Compensation should be inline with their local economy. Much the same as cost of living differences vary wages earned in the US.

I also advocate for using Etsy and ebay to ones advantage. I feel like both allow the individual to attempt to be self supporting. I think numerous laws are being imposed to limit the competition these sites allow to combat the corporate strangleholds. Once again something I vociferously oppose.


One of my favorite toy websites is:http://www.atoygarden.com/index.cfm You could try her for how she establishes her fair trade rate of reimbursement. I also tend to stick to the local artisans on etsy where you are buying from the artist. My big ticket purchases are generally antiques. So my biggest issue to tackle is the day to day products that are so difficult to track down or find ethical companies alternatives. Doesn't mean I stop trying. We eat a great deal of pasta which I can buy local manufactured. We have a local company for pizza pockets. We buy local produce whenever possible. Bit by bit we chip away at it...

People are pitting the solutions as a black and white response so they can throw stones at each other from their opposing sides. I think there are major problems and numerous ways to attack the issues. Ignoring it is the least attractive option imo.

I think my attitude is that it is either equally enforced or equally dismissed regarding all the living conditions and wage issues. We should be a country that puts our money where are mouth is and not choose to silently exploit those we cannot see while demanding the few that are employed pay for the rampant unemployment and economic devastation occuring due to companies seeking lowest wage and highest profit with no ethics.
 
And the fact is also that, as few as the options are, you still want to make them even fewer.

Not true. I gave you alternatives. I work the options I have as I learn of them. I seek alternatives constantly. Drop the drama.
 
Not true. I gave you alternatives. I work the options I have as I learn of them. I seek alternatives constantly. Drop the drama.

They won't. The drama queens of "libertarianism" simply espouse a version of globalism, i.e. corporate globalism in the name of "free" international markets. Governments have created these monsters through statutory law whether in the US or elsewhere. These corporate monsters are NOT the product of "free" markets. ;) The US needs to tend and encourage "free" (as possible through rescinding most statutory law) markets at home and discourage subsidized competition of multinational corporations from undercutting domestic markets through tariffs.
 
Last edited:
The founding fathers advocated tariffs, not an income tax, to fund the federal govt. With a lack of tariffs combined with an income tax, this really comes around as corporate welfare.
 
The founding fathers advocated tariffs, not an income tax, to fund the federal govt. With a lack of tariffs combined with an income tax, this really comes around as corporate welfare.

Yes, it is amazing that so many people want to protect free trade on imports at the expense of taxing American trade to death. We are paying the bill for protecting foreign free trade. That is at least one order of magnitude worse than a flat tariff, since we'd still be paying the bill anyway but instead of only affecting our products the cost would affect everyone.
 
When we are left with nothing but service sector jobs everyone will be competing for them and that will drive the price of labor down. So they will also be working for peanuts.

I guess it depends. Part of my service sector tradesman job involves harvesting a raw material that is in high demand in Russia and China. I make money on both ends.
 
How ironic. I'm using a Microsoft mouse to submit this post. The picture doesn't tell the whole story. Asians tend to think or rest with their heads resting on desks. I do the same thing and have been accused of slacking by teachers when I did it in their classes.

However, the description of the conditions is appalling. That's one of the reasons I think that "free trade" is a complete myth. I don't agree with Ron Paul on this issue. We need protectionism in some form or another. Maybe in some fantasyland a capitalist system with completely free trade would work, but not the way America works. You have workers in America competing against workers with no rights being paid horrible wages working in horrible conditions. It makes absolutely no sense that such "free trade" would work.

Protectionism is why we take jobs overseas to places like this. Companies here cannot afford the regulations so they take it elsewhere to survive.
 
Companies here cannot afford the regulations so they take it elsewhere to survive.

Except that they're going to the place with the cheapest possible labor. They could go to mexico or brazil, could they not?

Of course they could, but they don't because they don't care about the consequences of going for the lowest possible price.
 
We must have near slave labor so that Bill Gates can have a bigger profit margin. Gates really needs that money. Not that he wants to spend it. His vast wealth gives him the clout to attend all the global Oligarchy meetings and further his new world agenda, including pushing for the use of taxpayer money to help support all these poor, abused people in the third world. Future generations can worship at shrines to Gates and his superior business genius and limitless benevolence. :rolleyes:

Coincidentally, Bill Gates was just on American Idol talking about charity in the third world. Nothing wrong with that.

He requested a donation to his "One" Foundation, so that he could make sure that government stays "generous". You donate money to the Bill Gates Foundation so that he can take (extort) even more money from you (the taxpayer) and give it to the people of his choice. Of course St. Bill can take credit for it (and karma credits for his next life). :rolleyes:
 
American workers expect too much from their employers. They want health insurance paid for, they want weeks of vacation paid for, they want weeks of sick time to be paid for, they want their retirement to be paid for, and on top of all that, they want to make a lot of money now. The American worker has priced themselves out of the labor market in most regards. I mean, look at the auto industry. They get paid something like 75 dollars an hour when you take benefits into account, and most of the workers are just putting a single part on and tightening a few bolts. People expect every job to support whatever lifestyle they want to live.

It really says something about how much the American worker expects to earn when it is cheaper to make something that is some 10,000 miles of water away and in order to get a product here it is made there, put on a truck shipped to a port, put on a ship, travels over the biggest ocean in the world, off loaded onto a truck, then trucked to a distro center, then trucked to another distro center, then trucked to a store where it will be finally sold.

Regulations and taxes also have a lot to do with businesses leaving, but it is mostly the mindset people have that they deserve everything in the world and to be taken care of totally by everyone else, no matter what profession they have simply because they live here in America. THAT is what is killing this country. Calvin and Hobbes comic comes to mind.
 
We must have near slave labor so that Bill Gates can have a bigger profit margin. Gates really needs that money. Not that he wants to spend it. His vast wealth gives him the clout to attend all the global Oligarchy meetings and further his new world agenda, including pushing for the use of taxpayer money to help support all these poor, abused people in the third world. Future generations can worship at shrines to Gates and his superior business genius and limitless benevolence. :rolleyes:

If you don't want Gates to have money, stop buying his products and persuade others to follow suit.
 
The problem is for the kids born in China right now. They don't have a choice. They can work 70 hours a week at one factory, or 70 hours a week at another. What are they going to do, go buy some land 500 miles away and start farming? Of course not.

I really wish we weren't supporting this system. But the question is, is it even possible to buy a computer part that was made by people with a decent standard of living?
 
The state of this thread indicates to me that we need to unban Conza88 immediately.
 
Wow. I'm glad there are so many grand supporters of this. FOR THIS IS CAPITALISM!

LET US PROMOTE IT TO OUR CHILDREN! WORK HERE, BE PRODUCTIVE!
really now?
 
Back
Top