None of the above ^ ^
However, if we could somehow get the DNA of Ayn Rand, Milton Friedman and Murray Rothbard together for a mergy-cloney thingy....
I'd vote for that person
Ron Paul's position on abortion is diametrically opposed to the official Libertarian Parties position. It's a clear deal breaker.
A person either agrees with Ron Paul on this or they don't. Those who fully agree with Ron Paul on this issue, can't, in good conscience, maintain their integrity while casting a vote that even indirectly supports that plank of the Libertarian Party's official platform.
I fully support all of Ron Paul's positions.
I am a staunch Paleo-Conservative Republican. Constitutional rights begin at conception.
If I were to vote across party lines, it would be for the Constitution Party's candidate. (Chief Justice Roy Moore & Alan Keyes both have good chances of being nominated)
The problem with the LP is that it is controlled by the most radical libertarians in the country. These folks would rather muddle around out of power, pointing fingers and complaining than actually trying to govern which requires the ability to moderate your views, no matter how right you think you are. The LP is in dire need of a new direction and someone that think the only way to be pure in your beliefs is to hold the most extreme libertarian views.
Many of the candidates on the list would help bring the LP more into the American mainstream but as long as the party remains in control by the lunatic fringe it will remain an asterisk in American politics and not even mentioned in government.
Leonard Peikoff and David D. Friedman?
Those two combined offer everything the previous three did...
Peikoff seems a bit full of himself at times, but I'd still vote for him. Great ideas and generally offers unthought of ways to more efficiently put the ideas into practice.
I'm not familiar with David Friedman.... Milton's son???
agreed! if its ONLY mccain or ventura, do vote ventura!
i think dr. ron paul wants us to teach mccain a lesson!