The Hard Left on Southern Poverty Law Centre

sailor

Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2008
Messages
1,083
The lefties do often pleasantly surprise.


King of the Hate Business

By ALEXANDER COCKBURN

What is the arch-salesman of hate-mongering, Mr. Morris Dees of the Southern Poverty Law Center doing now? He’s saying that the election of a black president proves his point. Hate is on the rise! Send money!

Without skipping a beat, the mailshot moguls, who year after year make money selling the notion there’s been a right resurgence out there in the hinterland with massed legions of haters, have used the election of a black president to say that, yes, hate is on the rise and America ready to burst apart at the seams, with millions of extremists primed to march down Main Street draped in Klan robes, a copy of Mein Kampf tucked under one arm and a Bible under the other, available for sneak photographs from minions of Chip Berlet, another salesman of the Christian menace, ripely endowed with millions to battle the legions of the cross.

Ever since 1971 US Postal Service mailbags have bulged with Dees’ fundraising letters, scaring dollars out of the pockets of trembling liberals aghast at his lurid depictions of hate-sodden America, in dire need of legal confrontation by the SPLC. Nine years ago Ken Silverstein wrote a devastating commentary on Dees and the SPLC in Harpers, dissecting a typical swatch of Dees’ solicitations. At that time, as Silverstein pointed out, the SPLC was “the wealthiest civil rights group in America,” with $120 million in assets.

As of October 2008 the net assets of the SPLC were $170,240,129, The merchant of hate himself, Mr. Dees, was paid an annual $273,132 as chief trial counsel, and the SPLC’s president and CEO, Richard Cohen, $290,193. Total revenue in 2007 was $44,727,257 and program expenses $20,804,536. In other words, the Southern Poverty Law Center was raising twice as much as it was spending on its proclaimed mission. Fund-raising and administrative expenses accounted for $9 million, leaving $14 million to be put in the center’s vast asset portfolio.

The 990 non profit tax record for the SPLC indicates that the assets fell by about $50 million last year, meaning that like almost all non profits the SPLC took a bath in the stock crash. So what was thr end result of all that relentless hoarding down the year, as people of modest means, scared by Dees, sent him their contributions. Were they put to good use? It doesn’t seem so. They vanished in an electronic blip.

But where are the haters? That hardy old stand-by, the KKK, despite the SPLC’s predictable howls about an uptick in its chapters, is a moth-eaten and depleted troupe, at least 10 per cent of them on the government payroll as informants for the FBI. As Noel Ignatiev once remarked in his book Race Traitor, there isn’t a public school in any county in the USA that doesn’t represent a menace to blacks a thousand times more potent than that offered by the KKK, just as there aren’t many such schools that probably haven’t been propositioned by Dees to buy one of the SPLC’s “tolerance” programs. What school is going to go on record rejecting Dees-sponsored tolerance?

Dees and his hate-seekers scour the landscape for hate like the arms manufacturers inventing new threats and for the same reason: it’s their staple.

To Read More: http://www.counterpunch.org/cockburn05152009.html
 
Nice piece. Alexander Cockburn has always been a stand-up guy.

The SPLC ran afoul of the genuine progressives when they smeared the anti-WTO protests as being clandistinely organized by white supremacists.
I think that was because the SPLC supports the Democratic Party along with its neo-liberal economic views, so of course anyone who's opposed to it is seen as a threat.
You'd think alleged anti-racists like Dees would be concerned with poor people in Third World countries becoming even more impoverished by phony free trade (or as Cockburn also pointed out, the de facto institutionalized racism that nonwhite Americans still face), but I guess it's easier and safer to scream about neo-Nazi and Klan losers who have no real power and attempt to link anything remotely anti-government with racism.
 
Last edited:
I think the fundamental problem is that the whole range of operations of outfits like the SPLC consist of lobbying the government and officials to spend money in that way or to pass such and such restrictions. Their whole existance revolves around the state.

If extremist hate groups are a problem they could with their money launch a privately funded campaign to win hearts and minds. That would be a worthy goal.
 
I think the fundamental problem is that the whole range of operations of outfits like the SPLC consist of lobbying the government and officials to spend money in that way or to pass such and such restrictions. Their whole existance revolves around the state.

If extremist hate groups are a problem they could with their money launch a privately funded campaign to win hearts and minds. That would be a worthy goal.

Here are two pieces that touch on the real goal of those proposed restrictions.
http://www.konformist.com/botm/volume03/botm0999.htm
http://www.konformist.com/botm/volume02/botm1198.htm

I completely agree with the assessment that the hatemongers and hate groups are useful idiots.

I believe Cockburn is really an anarchist, which could explain why he has such a different take on things than the cookie-cutter leftists.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top