So everyone is going from unelectable to "he can't win." I wonder what the next line will be.
He can't be re-elected, he's 80.
So everyone is going from unelectable to "he can't win." I wonder what the next line will be.
Someone with tube skills should make a tube of the moving ceiling....
Where does it say 33%?
How did such a man rise to the top of the polls? One thing to note is that his support has a ceiling: in no state do more than about a third of Republican voters favour him, though in Iowa’s crowded race that could be all he needs.
somebody needs to compile clips of all of the ceiling comments as they have been going up. it appears ron paul is raising the roof.
Use this as a start,somebody needs to compile clips of all of the ceiling comments as they have been going up. it appears ron paul is raising the roof.
MSM has predicted a new Ron Paul ceiling. Everybody drink!
I wonder if these MSM clowns will know to stop this ceiling talk at 50% ? Probably not.
Yes, in a 3+ candidate race it would be.49.9 repeating is the highest it can get before saying Ron Paul's ceiling is the majority vote right? I already think 33% is hilariously close to that.
hxxp://www.economist.com/node/21542199
Be the first to comment. They dont use the word quixotic, they have a drawn cartoon on RP on a donkey with a lance, tilting at a windmill labeled "The Fed".
I didnt hate the article, besides the totally negative predictions of "he can't win".
The publication belongs to The Economist Group, half of which is owned by the Financial Times, a subsidiary of Pearson PLC. A group of independent shareholders, including many members of the staff and the Rothschild banking family of England, owns the rest. A board of trustees formally appoints the editor, who cannot be removed without its permission. In addition, about two thirds of the 75 staff journalists are based in London, despite the global emphasis.
http://www.nyse.com/about/listed/pso.html[TABLE="class: infobox vcard"]
[TR]
[TD]TYPE: Weekly Newsmagazine[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]FORMAT: Magazine[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]OWNER: The Economist Group Pearson PLC
http://www.nyse.com/about/listed/pso.html[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]FOUNDER: James Wilson[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: agent"]EDITOR: John Micklethwait[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]FOUNDED: September 1843[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]POLITICAL Alignment: Economic liberalism
aka Keynesism
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: label"] ADDRESS: 25 St James's Street
Westminster
London
SW1A 1HG
England[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]CIRCULATION: over 1.6 million copies per week[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
INTERACTIVE STATE POLLING of GOP candidates: http://www.economist.com/content/republican-candidates-president
Where does it say 33%?
One thing to note is that his support has a ceiling: in no state do more than about a third of Republican voters favour him
It's in the 2nd paragraph.
How did such a man rise to the top of the polls? One thing to note is that his support has a ceiling: in no state do more than about a third of Republican voters favour him, though in Iowa’s crowded race that could be all he needs.
Now in what state do more than 33% of Republican voters favor any of the candidates?