Virgil Goode The Constitution Party nominates a neo-con for President.

[Anti Federalist]

Paul might not be on the general election ballot--we have to face up to that reality. If he isn't, write-ins in almost all states won't even get counted and added up. At least vote third party and help them to keep their ballot access. These votes get counted and documented for posterity and they send a signal that you're disaffected and don't like the major party choices.

I'm not really interested, when the third parties start acting like the first parties.

No One But Paul

 

[LibertyEagle]

I'm confused.

"We support legislation to stop the flow of illegal drugs into these United States from foreign sources"

'We stand against so-called "sexual orientation" and "hate crime" statutes that attempt to legitimize inappropriate sexual behavior...we oppose any legal recognition of homosexual unions...we oppose efforts to legalize adoption of children by homosexual singles or couples."

"Gambling promotes an increase in crime, destruction of family values, and a decline in the moral fiber of our country."

"We call on our local, state and federal governments to uphold our cherished First Amendment right to free speech by vigorously enforcing our laws against obscenity to maintain a degree of separation between that which is truly speech and that which only seeks to distort and destroy."

These are all quotes from the Constitution Party homepage. http://www.constitutionparty.com/party_platform.php

The idea that they'd pick a neo-con doesn't surprise me in the least. They don't sound all that terribly Libertarian to me, more like some religious party. I'm confused as to why this nomination surprises anyone. Will we be surprised when the Prohibition party nominates someone who supports prohibition?

Oh really? Since when do libertarians agree with "hate crime" laws or any group laws at all? Do tell.

You also seem confused as to what a neocon really is. Please check this out.

 

[kylejack]

Paul might not be on the general election ballot--we have to face up to that reality. If he isn't, write-ins in almost all states won't even get counted and added up. At least vote third party and help them to keep their ballot access. These votes get counted and documented for posterity and they send a signal that you're disaffected and don't like the major party choices.

Ballot access for a party that would pick this guy? No thanks. I'll let them and their party worry about that.

 

[Inny Binny]

Oh really? Since when do libertarians agree with "hate crime" laws or any group laws at all? Do tell.

You also seem confused as to what a neocon really is. Please check this out.

It's the last bit of that bolded quote that is clearly in violation of libertarianism.

 

[LibertyEagle]

It's the last bit of that bolded quote that is clearly in violation of libertarianism.

This can be viewed either way. lol. Are you agreeing with him, or not?

 

[ProIndividual]

 

[Nathan Hale]

I'm not really interested, when the third parties start acting like the first parties.

No One But Paul

The third parties need not start acting like the legacy parties in order to be successful.