Gary Johnson The case for voting for Gary Johnson.

[Travlyr]

It's a conspiracy! RUN!!!!

Why do you not know who is in charge? How do you not know who is in charge? They tell you straight up. What is the deal with people not doing their homework?

CNBC admits We're all Slaves to the Central Bankers

And frankly I am not concerned with prison building Libertarian Gary Johnson who believes that Abe Lincoln was a great president becoming president. He has zero chance. I am simply bringing some truth to the table. Do some of your own research. It is not that hard.

 

[Nathan Hale]

Why do you not know who is in charge? How do you not know who is in charge? They tell you straight up. What is the deal with people not doing their homework?

CNBC admits We're all Slaves to the Central Bankers

And frankly I am not concerned with prison building Libertarian Gary Johnson who believes that Abe Lincoln was a great president becoming president. He has zero chance. I am simply bringing some truth to the table. Do some of your own research. It is not that hard.

Sorry, the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers told me at the last Bohemian Grove gathering that you're full of it. Then we all took a black helicopter to the Bilderberg meeting where I got inducted into Skull and Bones and learned that central bankers are actually working via the Aspen Institute to grow Van Jones into a 300 foot tall monster capable of terrorizing Los Angeles.

 

[Travlyr]

Sorry, the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers told me at the last Bohemian Grove gathering that you're full of it. Then we all took a black helicopter to the Bilderberg meeting where I got inducted into Skull and Bones and learned that central bankers are actually working via the Aspen Institute to grow Van Jones into a 300 foot tall monster capable of terrorizing Los Angeles.

Incredible. You are either totally ignorant of the world in which you live, or you are a shill for the central bankers. Which is it? Do you actually believe the nightly news?

 

[Respect38]

He's also tweeted that he would appoint judges like Judge Andrey Napolitano to the Supreme Court.

I'd say that this is one of the more overlooked things--if Gary Johnson wins, we could very well have several liberty-minded judges in the Supreme Court for years to come.

Even if don't like Gary Johnson more than Robamney (and I don't see how you could...) you'd still surely appreciate that a Johnson term would at least mean more judges like these being in the Supreme Court.

 

[HardyMacia]

This isn't about Ron Paul vs Gary Johnson. It's about Liberty. Both are great standard bearers for liberty. I can pull out just as many anti-liberty things Paul has done as Johnson. It's depressing listening to people on the liberty forums bashing Johnson. Is he perfect? No. Is Paul perfect? No. This infighting in the liberty movement isn't going to keep the campaign for liberty alive through November.

I'm not going to say their are government plants trying to subvert the liberty movement by, but if I wanted to destroy it then having plants destroy it from the inside out would be the way to do it. They would push useless things like write-in for Ron Paul which are votes that aren't counted and put liberty activists on the side line just at the most important time between September and November when the masses of people actually start to pay attention to politics. Imagine the 50k write-in voters instead out campaigning for some with the libertarian credentials and track record of Johnson - we could get Johnson into the debates against Obamney and then lid would be ripped right off the old parties.

Keep up the infighting and trolling though because that's what is best for liberty.

 

[Travlyr]

This isn't about Ron Paul vs Gary Johnson. It's about Liberty. Both are great standard bearers for liberty. I can pull out just as many anti-liberty things Paul has done as Johnson. It's depressing listening to people on the liberty forums bashing Johnson. Is he perfect? No. Is Paul perfect? No. This infighting in the liberty movement isn't going to keep the campaign for liberty alive through November.

I'm not going to say their are government plants trying to subvert the liberty movement by, but if I wanted to destroy it then having plants destroy it from the inside out would be the way to do it. They would push useless things like write-in for Ron Paul which are votes that aren't counted and put liberty activists on the side line just at the most important time between September and November when the masses of people actually start to pay attention to politics. Imagine the 50k write-in voters instead out campaigning for some with the libertarian credentials and track record of Johnson - we could get Johnson into the debates against Obamney and then lid would be ripped right off the old parties.

Keep up the infighting and trolling though because that's what is best for liberty.

If what you say is true, then why didn't Gary Johnson drop out and endorse Ron Paul early on in the race instead of running against him? Ron Paul clearly had the largest following and best funding. Gary's dropping out and working for Ron Paul when he had the opportunity would have been an act of uniting the liberty movement. Perhaps it would have put us over the top in Iowa when we needed the momentum the most.

 

[Imperial]

Did our founders compromise on our freedom?
No! Ok I get it.

So... no one but Paul?
No one but Paul!

Actually, they did. Thousands of Loyalists were tarred and feathered and had their property stolen. Not to mention how we screwed over the Native Americans. The Founders were human like anyone else.

I really do not want to be the thorn in the side of Gary Johnson. However, on inauguration day, Gary will be shown the wizard behind the curtain and his platform will be... whatever they tell him it is. That is why they 'Blacked Out' Ron Paul. Ron Paul has already peaked behind the curtain and they KNOW he will not sacrifice his principles to conform. Gary Johnson is incapable of delivering freedom to Americans because he himself doesn't understand it.

This is absolutely ridiculous. Paul has made compromises just like Johnson. He endorsed Lamar Smith in 2010 (author of SOPA) and he is probably not going to endorse a 3rd party candidate this time around. He is not a 'pure' libertarian- he has shown himself to be fine with limiting marriage via state action.

I don't mean that to discredit him. Sometimes you have to make compromises, and your ideology should probably not be perfectly taken from the pages of one of Rothbard's books. I have had the honor to vote for Dr. Paul several times. And while I will not be voting for Johnson in 2012 as it stands, it is maddeningly frustrating to see the circular firing squad come out at someone who is so solid on our general principles. If you can't bring yourself, ideologically, to vote for Johnson, Rand, Massie, or Amash, you really aren't looking to win elections but pontificate.

 

[cheapseats]

If what you say is true, then why didn't Gary Johnson drop out and endorse Ron Paul early on in the race instead of running against him?

When Gary Johnson RIGHTLY-AS-IN-CORRECTLY deemed "racing" for the Republican nomination to be futile and bailed on the Republican Party, he DID say he would endorse Ron Paul IF Ron Paul was the GOP nominee.

Ron Paul clearly had the largest following and best funding.

The mind REELS to think how much better Ron Paul would have fared as the Libertarian Party nominee. That nomination WAS HIS FOR THE ASKING.

Gary's dropping out and working for Ron Paul when he had the opportunity would have been an act of uniting the liberty movement.

We are back to the preposterously self-serving "argument" that all would be swell if "only" everyone who TRULY cared about Liberty would embrace this dubious-at-best strategy of TAKING CONTROL of the Republican Par-taaay...miraculously without becoming LIKE the scum with whom You-not-you "must" PLAY POLITICS = MAKE DEALS, in order to "get ahead" in the club that caters particularly to the Richest & Least Famous.

They DO vote, and most of 'em are NOT Limousine Liberals. Most of 'em vote Republican.

Perhaps it would have put us over the top in Iowa when we needed the momentum the most.

Holy Moly...now IOWA is Gary Johnson's fault?!

When Iowa "happened", Gary Johnson was best known for saying that his neighbor's dog had created more shovel-ready projects than Barack Obama:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sPYOvOcBgOg


Are "we" disregarding the UNNECESSARY fumbling of the Newsletter hot potato? Are "we" overlooking that Ron Paul went HOME TO LAKE JACKSON on the cusp of the Iowa Caucuses? Are "we" forgetting that diligent and determined Volunteers were inexplicably told in the 11th hour to NOT Watch The Vote?

 

[Respect38]

This dailypaul post really says everything I feel.

Basically, a very small number of states actually count write-in votes without having the candidate register for write-in votes.

Therefore, only you will know that you voted for Ron Paul. Nobody else will know, nobody else will care.

 

[Revolution9]

Sure, it's possible.

But "simply" promoting Gary Johnson AS A VIABLE PLAN B IF RON PAUL IS NOT ON THE NOVEMBER BALLOT gets me a ration of shit about traitorousness, 'cuz board namesake Ron Paul's hat is still in the ring.

Which brings me to RAND.

Why don't you just can it pal./ Yer on psychobabble autoblither max. It is totally tiresome and you aren't making any headway at all.

Rev9

 

[Revolution9]

He didn't do anything wrong per site rules. He was debating the "libertarian merits" of GJ vs RP.

\
\

He was a frikkin' liar and did so on purpose.

Rev9

 

[Revolution9]

This dailypaul post really says everything I feel.

Basically, a very small number of states actually count write-in votes without having the candidate register for write-in votes.

Therefore, only you will know that you voted for Ron Paul. Nobody else will know, nobody else will care.

And who the frak cares about a vote for Johnson in the bigger scheme. RP will get more write-ins that GJ gets votes. Guaranteed. Johnson ain't winning shit.

Rev9

 

[Revolution9]

He's the least bad option of the three, for sure, but as a Libertarian standard bearer, he's dreadful. That said, he's reading Economics In One Lesson and For A New Liberty, so there's always the possibility he'll improve.

On the Presidential trail and FINALLY reading something cogent. Well whoopitty frakkin' dooo. My son knew more than GJ does when he was 12 years old.

Rev9

 

[Revolution9]

Wrong, he can mathematically win, and if he gets to the debates, he could get a significant amount of disgruntled Rs, Ds, as well as a

hehehehehe..hehehehehh..heheheh.. Seriously? No frikkin' way. Yer delusional.

Rev9

 

[Revolution9]

Sorry, the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers told me at the last Bohemian Grove gathering that you're full of it.

\
Yer not funny. Yer just parading ignorance in full glory pretending it to be enlightenment. It just shows what software you run for reality parsing. It has many firewalls that do not allow critical info to pass the barrier.

Rev9

 

[Revolution9]

Anyone have any news on Gary's experience with Economics In One Lesson and For A New Liberty?

He fell asleep. The first two pages were more info than he could handle at once. Needs a more decisive chin to be able to contain important info in his brainpan.

Rev9

 

[Respect38]

And who the frak cares about a vote for Johnson in the bigger scheme. RP will get more write-ins that GJ gets votes. Guaranteed. Johnson ain't winning shit.

Rev9

Oh, I like what I'm hearing.

How much are you willing to bet? Because Gary Johnson is guaranteed to get more votes than Ron Paul.

I don't usually bet, but whenever someone gives me a bet that I'm guaranteed to win, how can you turn that down?

hehehehehe..hehehehehh..heheheh.. Seriously? No frikkin' way. Yer delusional.

Rev9

I think you're a bit confused, based on the lack of actual points coming from your side.

 

[cheapseats]

Why don't you just can it pal.

Got my reasons. I expect YOU have reasons for thousands and thousands and thousands of posts, too.

In comparison with most Tough Guys, yer downright TALKATIVE.

Yer on psychobabble autoblither max.

Whereas YOU are a BLUSTERER.

It is totally tiresome

Ignore it.

and you aren't making any headway at all.

Seems Gary Johnson IS making some headway.

JohnsonFest?: To appear at BOTH PaulFest and FreedomFest

June 22nd, 2012


Libertarian Presidential Candidate Governor Gary Johnson and Vice-Presidential running mate Judge Jim Gray are scheduled to speak at BOTH Paul Festival and Freedom Festival 2012 near Tampa Florida August 24 to 27.

Paul Festival organizers announced earlier today:

Johnson and Judge Jim Gray Confirmed to Speak

: CHICAGO, IL – Paul Festival announced today they had confirmed former New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson to their list of speakers. Johnson joins an already packed collection of liberty advocates for the festival featuring vendors, speakers and live music.

See: http://paulfestival.org/78-news-a-press/232-paul-festival-announces-gary-johnson

Previously Johnson had been announced as a keynote speaker at Freedom Festival, a concurrent event to be held at Fantasy of Flight (about 40 minutes east of Tampa).

http://www.freedomfestival2012.com

Judge Jim Gray is expected to speak at this event as well.

Specific program details have not yet been posted for either event, but IPR has learned that Johnson is scheduled (subject to change) to introduce the Steve Miller Band at Freedom Fest on Friday night, and has been initially awarded a key slot at PaulFest the following night.

Details to follow (film at 11) as they are released.

(If you didn’t get the 1970s TV news reference, see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Film_at_11)


http://www.independentpoliticalrepo...t-to-appear-at-both-paulfest-and-freedomfest/

 

[Nathan Hale]

Incredible. You are either totally ignorant of the world in which you live, or you are a shill for the central bankers. Which is it? Do you actually believe the nightly news?

Kill your television!

 

[Nathan Hale]

If what you say is true, then why didn't Gary Johnson drop out and endorse Ron Paul early on in the race instead of running against him? Ron Paul clearly had the largest following and best funding. Gary's dropping out and working for Ron Paul when he had the opportunity would have been an act of uniting the liberty movement. Perhaps it would have put us over the top in Iowa when we needed the momentum the most.

Gary followed the plan perfectly. He stayed in the primary when it was perfectly fine to have multiple liberty voices in the race and dropped out before voting started and moved into position as the LP backup, acknowledging that he would demure if it turned out that Paul won the GOP nod.