The Border is now a Military Base (The Roosevelt Reservation)

The piece is saying Trump isn't even doing that much, and you're calling it a pack of lies. You could not only not recognize the truth if you saw it, you couldn't handle it either. Truth offends you.

Nobody asked if it was enough. Is it a lie? You say "Trump is doing that" without saying what "that" is. If he is discouraging cities from doing that, why isn't the shitlib branch of the MSM whining about it? And if you can't, in fact, disprove it, what excuse have you got for Trump this time?
He's already been sued for denying federal funds to sanctuary jurisdictions.

And the whole goal of the article is the same as always with the globalibertarians, to prevent deportations and border security by pretending that the only reason invaders come or stay is welfare.
 
The US border control at the northern border has started searching all vehicles without probable cause leaving the US for Canada this week.
 

Pentagon Again Expanding Military Border Zones, This Time in Arizona​


Code:
https://www.military.com/daily-news/2025/07/02/pentagon-again-expanding-military-border-zones-time-arizona.html

 
Look at the power-worshipping shill celebrate the expanding police state.
 
Look at the giver of aid and comfort of to the enemy opposing the stopping of the invasion.

Your pathetic attempt to paint every issue as either/or does not change the facts. And the facts are, it's possible to oppose the "invasion" and the police state at the same time, and it's possible to oust illegals without destroying the Fourth Amendment.
 
Your pathetic attempt to paint every issue as either/or does not change the facts. And the facts are, it's possible to oppose the "invasion" and the police state at the same time, and it's possible to oust illegals without destroying the Fourth Amendment.
What you do is define things like this as the police state that absolutely are not.
 
What you do is define things like this as the police state that absolutely are not.

If stopping vehicles that haven't even violated one of the myriad traffic misdemeanors isn't police state activity, what is it?
 
If stopping vehicles that haven't even violated one of the myriad traffic misdemeanors isn't police state activity, what is it?
Fulfilling the Article V mandate to defend the states against invasion, the most basic of legitimate government duties.
 
I have concluded that the entire framework of money, nations, and private property is fundamentally flawed. World governments have seized ownership of all resources necessary for life. Money was engineered as a tool to extract wealth and extort labor from people. Governments stole the land and resources—thieves have no legitimate authority to grant or transfer what they have stolen. No other living creature on Earth must submit or pay for the means to survive. In the human story, governments must be abolished and people must reclaim the resources that are rightfully theirs. When money becomes worthless and nations meaningless, borders will vanish and the artificial divisions between people will no longer matter.

If you’re cheering for troops on the border, you’re not defending liberty—you’re defending the power of the very system that keeps every human captive.


Borders are not about safety or sovereignty; they are artificial lines drawn by governments to control the movement of people and resources. The same government that claims to “protect” you with troops is the one that owns all the land, all the water, all the food, and even your right to exist. They decide who crosses, who stays, who eats, who works, and who is caged. This is not freedom—it is captivity with paperwork and guns.


Arguing about which party or leader controls the border is like debating who gets to hold the keys to your cell. The real issue is that you’re in a cell at all. Every government—left, right, or center—serves itself, not you. They ration survival, license your existence, and can turn off your access to food, water, energy, or even movement at any moment.


If you truly care about liberty, stop celebrating the expansion of government power—military, police, or bureaucratic. The border is just another tool of control, another wall in the Monopoly game you were born into. Real freedom isn’t about who gets to cross the line; it’s about tearing down the line altogether and reclaiming the resources and dignity that are yours by birth.


Until then, you’re not free. You’re just a player in their game, cheering for your own jailer.
 
Last edited:
I have no issue with this.

This is the military's job and it is the President's job, as Chief Executive, to enforce the Constitution and make sure it is done.

Section. 4.​

The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.
 
Borders are not about safety or sovereignty; they are artificial lines drawn by governments to control the movement of people and resources.

Yes, they most certainly are.

They are about safety and sovereignty and to control the movement of people and resources, both.

History is riddled with the death and destruction of thousands of societies and millions of people who, for whatever reason, (and many of those reasons are now manifesting themselves right in front our eyes) could not, WOULD not organize and defend themselves from an invading or overpowering outside force of arms or people or both.

I do not want the Levant, the sub continent of India or sub Saharan Africa invading the United States via demographic warfare.

Using organized force to repel such invaders, to "control their movement" is just, constitutional and moral.

We like to remember and memorialize the 300 Spartans at the Battle of Thermopylae and their defiant cry, when told to lay down their arms in the face of a half a million Persians: Come and Get Them.

But what were those brave men defending?

Philosotarian navel gazing from the likes of Plato and Socrates?

No, they were defending their homes, their land, their wives and children, their borders.
 
Yes, they most certainly are.

They are about safety and sovereignty and to control the movement of people and resources, both.

History is riddled with the death and destruction of thousands of societies and millions of people who, for whatever reason, (and many of those reasons are now manifesting themselves right in front our eyes) could not, WOULD not organize and defend themselves from an invading or overpowering outside force of arms or people or both.

I do not want the Levant, the sub continent of India or sub Saharan Africa invading the United States via demographic warfare.

Using organized force to repel such invaders, to "control their movement" is just, constitutional and moral.

We like to remember and memorialize the 300 Spartans at the Battle of Thermopylae and their defiant cry, when told to lay down their arms in the face of a half a million Persians: Come and Get Them.

But what were those brave men defending?

Philosotarian navel gazing from the likes of Plato and Socrates?

No, they were defending their homes, their land, their wives and children, their borders.
Yea well that all sounds good too but I am now of the opinion that it is us vs the government not us vs other poor suckers. Invasions are because of governments. Governments are the problem.
 
Yea well that all sounds good too but I am now of the opinion that it is us vs the government not us vs other poor suckers. Invasions are because of governments. Governments are the problem.
Bacteria invading your skin or mucus membranes or lungs will kill you.

Bacteria inside your intestinal tract is necessary to keep you alive.

Bacteria are the problem?
 
Back
Top