The Blaze: Ron Paul’s interview of Julian Assange will put you to sleep

[AuH20]

Personal acquaintance of him? First hand knowledge? Or yet another effort to shove Beck and The Blaze down our throats?

None of the above. You can do what you like. You can reside in the Ron Paul temple and watch the world pass by. I've never seen more thinned skin, almost paranoid people in my life. We get it. You don't like or trust Glenn Beck. That's completely acceptable. But let's stop with the riduculous insinuations that he's taking over minds. That's utter tripe. Grow up.

 

[kathy88]

None of the above. You can do what you like. You can reside in the Ron Paul temple and watch the world pass by. I've never seen more thinned skin, almost paranoid people in my life. We get it. You don't like or trust Glenn Beck. That's completely acceptable. But let's stop with the riduculous insinuations that he's taking over minds. That's utter tripe. Grow up.

Please point me to where I said anything resembling the utter bullshit you just typed. If you think there aren't people who will vote for someone just because Beck endorses them you're fucking crazier than Beck says Ron is.

 

[JK/SEA]

None of the above. You can do what you like. You can reside in the Ron Paul temple and watch the world pass by. I've never seen more thinned skin, almost paranoid people in my life. We get it. You don't like or trust Glenn Beck. That's completely acceptable. But let's stop with the riduculous insinuations that he's taking over minds. That's utter tripe. Grow up.

he took over your mind, and other Beck worshipers in here.

thats cool. But expect blowback for promoting this snake on Medusas head.

 

[Origanalist]

None of the above. You can do what you like. You can reside in the Ron Paul temple and watch the world pass by. I've never seen more thinned skin, almost paranoid people in my life. We get it. You don't like or trust Glenn Beck. That's completely acceptable. But let's stop with the riduculous insinuations that he's taking over minds. That's utter tripe. Grow up.

Who is this "we" that you speak of?

 

[AuH20]

Please point me to where I said anything resembling the utter bullshit you just typed. If you think there aren't people who will vote for someone just because Beck endorses them you're fucking crazier than Beck says Ron is.

Yes, but they are few and far between. Do you think human beings will completely abandon the knowledge gained via life experiences to vote for someone that a talk host recommends? It's not that simple.

 

[green73]

None of the above. You can do what you like. You can reside in the Ron Paul temple and watch the world pass by. I've never seen more thinned skin, almost paranoid people in my life. We get it. You don't like or trust Glenn Beck. That's completely acceptable. But let's stop with the riduculous insinuations that he's taking over minds. That's utter tripe. Grow up.

Who has said that he's out to take over the world? People here just think he's a snake. History is rife with examples.

You sir, are despicable in the way you employ shallow, dishonest devices in your debates.

 

[AuH20]

he took over your mind, and other Beck worshipers in here.

thats cool. But expect blowback for promoting this snake on Medusas head.

I have no 'allegiance' to Glenn Beck. He's too docile for my tastes and sometimes injects too much religion into his platform. What I'm challenging is the ridiculous notion that he's coming to conquer minds. I openly laugh at that assertion as a strong willed individual.

 

[kathy88]

Yes, but they are few and far between. Do you think human beings will completely abandon the knowledge gained via life experiences to vote for someone that a talk host recommends? It's not that simple.

You are giving credit to people who voted for John McCain. I personally know people who are too lazy to research themselves and vote for whoever their favorite talking head promotes. You are giving Americans too much credit here.

 

[JK/SEA]

Yes, but they are few and far between. Do you think human beings will completely abandon the knowledge gained via life experiences to vote for someone that a talk host recommends? It's not that simple.

yes, and your posts are exhibit 'A'...

in just a few posts, you single-handidly chastised Ron Paul, the Ron Paul supporters in Liberty Forest, and at the same time elevated Glenn Beck to God status in your world.

good job.

 

[mosquitobite]

I can't wait til it's closer to election time and Becks attacks start on Rand in favor of Cruz. Crow is great marinated in a nice white wine vinaigrette.

THIS.

 

[brushfire]

beck is a shill...


People are free to think what they want, but one should not take great personal offense when someone properly id's beck. My personal observation has nothing to do with temples, cults, or offense to Dr Paul (at least not directly). beck is shamelessly duplicitous in his support for liberty. He has been for quite some time. You dont need to take my word for it though... One can see for themselves, if they're interested in the truth.

 

[AuH20]

beck is a shill...


People are free to think what they want, but one should not take great personal offense when someone properly id's beck. My personal observation has nothing to do with temples, cults, or offense to Dr Paul (at least not directly). beck is shamelessly duplicitous in his support for liberty. He has been for quite some time. You dont need to take my word for it though... One can see for themselves, if they're interested in the truth.

Here is the problem with that theory. Why would two erudite and worldly individuals like Penn Jillette and Judge Napolitano closely associate with Beck if he is so "toxic" as you described? I personally don't know Beck's innermost motivations but I do trust the judgement of those two men, since their thought processes are far from conventional. They would certainly be onto such an obvious ruse, in your words? Correct? Unless they are part of the conspiracy as well? The pieces don't fit as neatly as some would state.

Like I said, I don't agree with him from time to time, but he's not Satan as many have wrongly ascribed him as. He's largely an entrepeneur who's on a zany mission from God in his words. I generally believe this confession, given his tumultuous history with substance abuse. This self-professed "holy" connection is very commonplace for former drug addicts who have hit rock-bottom.

 

[donnay]

Here is the problem with that theory. Why would two erudite and worldly individuals like Penn Jillette and Judge Napolitano closely associate with Beck if he is so "toxic" as you described? I personally don't know Beck's innermost motivations but I do trust the judgement of those two men, since their thought processes are far from conventional. Like I said, I don't agree with him from time to time, but he's not Satan as many have wrongly ascribed him as. He's largely an entrepeneur who's on a zany mission from God in his words. I generally believe this confession, given his tumultuous history with substance abuse. This self-professed "holy" connection is very commonplace for former drug addicts who have hit rock-bottom.

Beck isn't Satan--he is one of his minions. It's clear to me he definitely has chose that side. Any God-fearing person would not conscientiously manipulate the truth as Beck has done. It is clear, to me, he sold his soul. So has Limbaugh and Hannity and O'Reilly. They cannot sit day after day and not see the scripts they are handled are tainted with the blood of men, women and children on it.

 

[brushfire]

Here is the problem with that theory. Why would two erudite and worldly individuals like Penn Jillette and Judge Napolitano closely associate with Beck if he is so "toxic" as you described? I personally don't know Beck's innermost motivations but I do trust the judgement of those two men, since their thought processes are far from conventional. They would certainly be onto such an obvious ruse, in your words? Correct? Unless they are part of the conspiracy as well? The pieces don't fit as neatly as some would state.

Like I said, I don't agree with him from time to time, but he's not Satan as many have wrongly ascribed him as. He's largely an entrepeneur who's on a zany mission from God in his words. I generally believe this confession, given his tumultuous history with substance abuse. This self-professed "holy" connection is very commonplace for former drug addicts who have hit rock-bottom.

Please consider the 2 individuals you used in your example. Judge Nap and Penn are both very good libertarians (in my opinion). They also happen to be some of the most friendly people on earth. Really, they get along with almost everyone! Charlie Rangel..? Lawrence O’Donnell..? Yes, Nap and Penn hang around these guys. Good or bad, we cant always make our minds based on association - especially when there is enough quality information for us to draw our own conclusions. For me, association is not really a qualifier. Heck, just the other day there was a hit piece on Dr Paul because he was speaking at fatima - as though Dr Paul shares their views on all things, because he communicates with them. Nap and Penn are good human beings for being civil and spreading the word of liberty. They're probably doing more for glenn's audience than he ever could...

Look, I'm simply trying to point out that glenn beck is not always as he appears, and certainly not when it counts. When the chips are down, we can count on beck to show his true colors. He talks the talk, but when its time to move, he always sides with the establishment - I take that pretty personally. If you'd like, I cant cite examples all day, but I'm not sure that will change your mind. You seem to be more tolerant of that kind of behavior - that's ok, I'm not here to tell you how to think. For what its worth, I've watched more beck than I care to admit - years in fact. So my view on the man is not comprised of some opinion that someone else has of the man - good or bad.

 

[mosquitobite]

Look, I'm simply trying to point out that glenn beck is not always as he appears, and certainly not when it counts. When the chips are down, we can count on beck to show his true colors. He talks the talk, but when its time to move, he always sides with the establishment - I take that pretty personally. If you'd like, I cant cite examples all day, but I'm not sure that will change your mind. You seem to be more tolerant of that kind of behavior - that's ok, I'm not here to tell you how to think. For what its worth, I've watched more beck than I care to admit - years in fact. So my view on the man is not comprised of some opinion that someone else has of the man - good or bad.

I feel the same.

I also feel there are more than just Beck that meet this criteria (Sarah Palin comes to mind).

 

[jjdoyle]

As long as he keeps promoting Rand he can mock Ron all he wants. Right, apologists?

He'll promote Rand until time for a presidential election.......just like he "came around" to Ron Paul between 2008 and 2012, but couldn't support Ron in 2012.

 

[VoluntaryAmerican]

Sounds more like jealousy that they didn't get an interview from Assange.

 

[dannno]

Competition.

 

[erowe1]

They might be right. How many different funny voices did Ron Paul use? Did his sidekicks make fun of him? Any fake laughter or tears?

Glenn Beck fans don't have the attention spans for stuff without clowns in it.

 

[dannno]

This self-professed "holy" connection is very commonplace for former drug addicts who have hit rock-bottom.

Have you seen this series Orange is the New Black? It's great.. and there is a character like that to the extreme

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showth...s-Orange-Is-the-New-Black-(Creators-of-Weeds)