The Blaze: Ron Paul’s interview of Julian Assange will put you to sleep

Cap said:
It's fucking amazing how these Beck apologists contort and skew and prevaricate. Just fucking amazing.
Click to expand...

I have to use a dictionary from time to time with several of you guys' posts, you, bolil, osan, etc...where do you guys get these words?


pre·var·i·cate
[pri-var-i-keyt]

verb (used without object), pre·var·i·cat·ed, pre·var·i·cat·ing.
to speak falsely or misleadingly; deliberately misstate or create an incorrect impression; lie.

Oh, and

satchelmcqueen said:
hey beck! FUCK YOU!
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Cap
Hmmmm.

He did get us to talk about him or them or whatever. Are we riding coattails?
 
ClydeCoulter said:
I have to use a dictionary from time to time with several of you guys' posts, you, bolil, osan, etc...where do you guys get these words?


pre·var·i·cate
[pri-var-i-keyt]

verb (used without object), pre·var·i·cat·ed, pre·var·i·cat·ing.
to speak falsely or misleadingly; deliberately misstate or create an incorrect impression; lie.

Oh, and
Click to expand...


Wow! No kidding.

I'd be reaching for a laxative before I ever thought of a dictionary trying to pass that one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cap
if i have to esplane it, you wouldnt understand. lol! :)
ClydeCoulter said:
I have to use a dictionary from time to time with several of you guys' posts, you, bolil, osan, etc...where do you guys get these words?


pre·var·i·cate
[pri-var-i-keyt]

verb (used without object), pre·var·i·cat·ed, pre·var·i·cat·ing.
to speak falsely or misleadingly; deliberately misstate or create an incorrect impression; lie.

Oh, and
Click to expand...
 
kathy88 said:
Defending Ron. Something a lot of people aroun here stopped doing a long time ago. I might ask you why you're calling out Judge Nap as spreading bullshit in a thread title as well...
Click to expand...

No kidding. Has anyone else noticed that the most rabid Rand people are also the least apt to defend Ron now or even contribute to his threads?

Fuck end the fed. Fuck bringing the troops home. Fuck the whole radical message that made this movement happen. It's no longer about the message. It's about finagling enough dumb boobs in the Republican party to vote for a candidate in 2016 (2016!!!) that has half of Ron's genes and somewhat says good things (without any of the radical thunderbolts that led to this movement).

And does anybody really believe the establishment is going to allow him to be prez anyway??? Let's say the Hillary-loving media aren't completely horrible to him; do you trust the voting system? Seriously?

In 2017 there is going to be a serious hangover. And will we even remember the echoes of "End the Fed!"?
 
LibertyEagle said:
Kathy, what are you doing? :(

The important thing is the message. Remember?
Click to expand...

I don't think the message is important at all now to some, because if it was why would someone be charging for the message? I think Ron and Rand know it's too little too late, and unfortunately...they are just making a dime while the ship goes down before they hop onto the rescue boats/helicopter.

The last message I heard is that Mitch McConnell deserves my vote. Mitt Romney was a swell guy, and deserving of my support and vote. Oh, and if I run out of a gas station with a gun for whatever reason (could be chasing the burglar that actually just robbed the store) a drone flying overhead should blow the crap out of me and anybody else around. No need for a trial by jury, or any of that other waste of time stuff...just as long as I'm acting like a touch guy to the neocons, right?

If this was about the message, I doubt Ron Paul 2012 would have wasted money attacking Rick Santorum to help Mitt Romney win that nomination so Rand could get his RNC speech that none of your above average, average, and below average Republicans even remember.

But hey, some people can defend anything these days I guess...especially when they are wasting other people's money.
 
Last edited:
idiom said:
Pretty much. If the cognitive dissonance work on him then the message gets through.
Click to expand...

Not really.

The problem with people like Beck and Palin are that they SAY what the masses want to hear. They SAY the right things so people agree with them. So when they go on to endorse another candidate or bash the one candidate that actually matches up with their own rhetoric - the sheeple eat it up.

Newt Gingrich FFS? Santorum?? Really?
 
Earlier I posted, "It seems he sucked us right in."

Maybe I should retract that statement. I went to the Blaze article and don't see any mention of putting anyone to sleep. I do see the phrase, "Watch an unremarkable snippet of the interview here." Which is pretty good news for me. I didn't know you could watch snippet's of the video's. In fact to whole thing seems worth it for the shout out even if it does give the video snippet a jab.

As for the, Part 1: Exclusive Interview with WikiLeaks Founder Julian Assange, it seemed pretty good to me. It touches on world domination at points. As for someone finding the video "unremarkable" I found myself sort of wondering where the writers head is at.

I kind of wish I could go back over a transcript of the video. At 14:45 Julian gets into some rules about a military base that went over my head. Oh OH OH.

I played it again! It was talking about another instance of the head cheeses pretending to protect a fish, or a case of crabs or something, when they are really trying to drive people out of their homeland. You know like the people don't have any right to be a specie of their own. Anyway it was just a tool to rip off not only their naturality but their land or resources.



Anyway it's cool to see you can check out snippets if you can. I'm logged in so I can's see if it works on all of the others now. If it does that should be a good thing.

Here is a link to part two if your still awake;

http://www.ronpaulchannel.com/video/part-2-exclusive-interview-with-wikileaks-founder-julian-assange/

or maybe a snippet?
 
Julian talks about the inequality in power in #3.

I'm convinced that comes from some being able to fire up the fake money presses and printing up what ever it takes to dictate their will. That's the commonality that reaches to the very root.
 
kathy88 said:
Defending Ron. Something a lot of people aroun here stopped doing a long time ago. I might ask you why you're calling out Judge Nap as spreading bullshit in a thread title as well...
Click to expand...

+rep, Kathy.

There is no message anymore. There's a milquetoast "conservative" to whom all of us who came to Ron because of principle are now supposed to pledge allegiance based on nothing more than a wink and a nod.

Reagan's second term... if you're lucky. I'd rather fall on my sword, thankyouverymuch.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

W
Ron Paul: Tucker Slayed the Mainstream Media Dragon
Replies
0
Views
1K
WisconsinLiberty
W
timosman
Spies Are the New Journalists
Replies
1
Views
196
Swordsmyth
Swordsmyth
Anti Federalist
How Tucker Carlson Stoked White Fear to Conquer Cable
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
Anti Federalist
Anti Federalist
Lucille
The War On Whistleblowers & Why America's Next President Will Kill Julian Assange
Replies
12
Views
2K
Dark_Horse_Rider
D
timosman
How Silicon Valley, spooks and the super rich took control of the 21st century
Replies
1
Views
481
Matt Collins
Matt Collins
Back
Top