A national sales tax would destroy the economy.
A national sales tax would destroy people's purchasing power and thus lower their standard of living. The taxes are always in the range of 15% combine that with existing sales taxes you would have very expensive to purchase products.
Non sense a consumption tax is less moral. Goods and services require human effort to make land and natural resources don't.
Ditto.I miss RoyL![]()
How am I a troll? I see benefits in a different form of taxation and I see flaws in other forms of taxation. This shit ain't complicated.
How am I a troll? I see benefits in a different form of taxation and I see flaws in other forms of taxation. This shit ain't complicated.
How am I a troll?
I see benefits in ...taxation
Nonsense by using force to exclude people from natural resources that humanity inherited you are yourself being immoral.You start taxing me to live off the land, you basically forcing me to make a choice of being immoral or defending myself against your attempt to take something from me that doesn't belong to you.
Nonsense by using force to exclude people from natural resources that humanity inherited you are yourself being immoral.
You pay for the privilege of exclusion. I view property as a necessary evil. You pay for this privilege.So, how do you propose taxing land if no one owns it.![]()
Here you are being incredibly misleading. I said I see benefits in taxation being changed never did I said that taxation was a good thing unto itself as you try to propagandize. I never see anything as good or bad unto itself simply a means to an end.Q:
A:
You pay for the privilege of exclusion. I view property as a necessary evil. You pay for this privilege.
Here you are being incredibly misleading. I said I see benefits in taxation being changed never did I said that taxation was a good thing unto itself as you try to propagandize. I never see anything as good or bad unto itself simply a means to an end.
I am simply arguing if that you want to exclude that should pay those around you who give you that privilege. I see the privilege as necessary to carry out economic functions. As for eminent domain it is not necessary with advanced tunneling technology being suppressed by the government since eminent domain is mostly an issue of acquiring land for transportation functions.So as long as I PAY someone to use "force to exclude people from natural resources that humanity inherited" it's moral. However if I decide that I do not require your approval for the "privilege" to live on land that I occupy unencumbered by people looking to profit off that land, I am immoral.
Of course you view property as a necessary evil. You make perfect sense now.
Out of curiosity, do you find anything wrong with eminent domain?
I am simply arguing if that you want to exclude that should pay those around you who give you that privilege.
You pay for the privilege of exclusion. I view property as a necessary evil. You pay for this privilege.