The anti War candidate launches full scale attack on Yemen.

LOL

No, the plan is to put a stop to the provocations and avoid war instead of waiting for them to build up to a "9/11" moment where the public demands all out war against Iran directly.

So you're admitting that Trump is such a Netanyahu cuck that he caves to his every whim to keep him placated so he doesn't kick Trump's ass in the "manipulating the American people" department.

It's too late to deny it. Your words were plain enough. Everyone here knows which middle eastern intelligence agency was really behind 9/11/01.

LOL at yourself, and the moronic way you lay a trap for yourself and obligingly fall in it. Once again and as usual, behavior remarkably similar to that of liberal progressives.
 
Last edited:
So you're admitting that Trump is such a Netanyahu cuck that he caves to his every whim to keep him placated so he doesn't kick Trump's ass in the "manipulating the American people" department.

It's too late to deny it. Your words were plain enough. Everyone here knows which middle eastern intelligence agency was really behind 9/11/01.

LOL at yourself, and the moronic way you lay a trap for yourself and obligingly fall in it. Once again and as usual, behavior remarkably similar to that of liberal progressives.
Rave on.
I explained how Trump prevents America from being manipulated into war by Israel or Iran.

Peace through strength.
 
I explained how Trump prevents America from being manipulated into war by Israel or Iran.

What you said is he's attempting to avoid WWIII by caving to every one of Netanyahu's threats, thereby letting him lead us into WWIII. And no amount of ex post facto spin can hide the fact that you said it
 
What you said is he's attempting to avoid WWIII by caving to every one of Netanyahu's threats, thereby letting him lead us into WWIII. And no amount of ex post facto spin can hide the fact that you said it
LOL

Absolute nonsense.
He's not giving Netanyahu what he wants and he's stopping the provocations.

Your spin is pathetic.
 
We don’t have the greatest navy and Air Force in the world to sit idle and watch a bunch of terrorists attack merchant ships.

Smash them and leave. All is well.
 
Matthew 13:

13Therefore speak I to them in parables: because they seeing see not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand. 14And in them is fulfilled the prophecy of Esaias, which saith,
By hearing ye shall hear, and shall not understand;
And seeing ye shall see, and shall not perceive:
15 For this people's heart is waxed gross,
And their ears are dull of hearing,
And their eyes they have closed;
Lest at any time they should see with their eyes,
And hear with their ears,
And should understand with their heart,
And should be converted, and I should heal them.
 
Somebody can't even see how the stuff he proudly quotes in one thread completely contradicts the toxic bile he spews in another thread.

“The concept of ‘contingency planning’ has legitimized the concrete preparation of operations still presumably in a hypothetical stage.”

“If a group is assembled and revved up on a contingency basis, then the failure to carry the project through (it is argued) will invite the disappointment and alienation of the group.”

“CIA has effectively ‘made’ policy in many parts of the world.”
 
Somebody can't even see how the stuff he proudly quotes in one thread completely contradicts the toxic bile he spews in another thread.
Has absolutely nothing to do with what Trump is doing, if it did we'd have been at war with Iran in his last term.
It's proof that Trump is not doing what Israel and the CIA want.

Your logic circuits are failing.
 
Because they don't start an operation and then stop it, like Trump did when he considered a drone strike on Iran in the aftermath of Iran's attempt to retaliate for killing Solomani.

If he was going by the CIA's playbook that whole incident would have turned into the war the CIA, Iran, and Netanyahu wanted.

Try thinking about things when you read them.
 
Your logic circuits are failing.

We aren't talking about Soleimani. We're talking about Yemen, where Trump is putting the brakes on nothing.

Your alleged logic circuits are the ones full of fail, and just like the next liberal prog supporter of a failed Democrat, you're trying to make your own sins stick to me.
 
We aren't talking about Soleimani. We're talking about Yemen, where Trump is putting the brakes on nothing.

Your alleged logic circuits are the ones full of fail, and just like the next liberal prog supporter of a failed Democrat, you're trying to make your own sins stick to me.
LOL

We are only at the killing Solomani stage, the Houthi Pirates=Solomani.
There will be no war with Iran, just like last time.
 
Israeli citizens & a lot of his GOV want Netanyahoo out of power & he is so desperate to stay, he slaughters the weak *palestine* & stays in power

F&er has done this over & over & over

It's as bad as it can get

 
LOL

No, the plan is to put a stop to the provocations and avoid war instead of waiting for them to build up to a "9/11" moment where the public demands all out war against Iran directly.
That's what Trump did by killing Solomani.
You still think the Arab world just engages in international terror because of the West sitting back and our inaction globally?

SMH.
 
It's as bad as it can get

LOL at "Miriam Adelson's Goals Achieved".

What a bunch of cucks.

Here's someone from ten months ago who put it in terms even a cultist can comprehend:

IMG_2746.jpeg
 
Last edited:
You still think the Arab world just engages in international terror because of the West sitting back and our inaction globally?

SMH.

I supposed it's possible that inaction will wipe us out but since it's 100% certain that policing the world will wipe us out I'll take my chances on inaction.
 
I supposed it's possible that inaction will wipe us out but since it's 100% certain that policing the world will wipe us out I'll take my chances on inaction.

Except it's not really policing the world.

Arming Israel which we have done is the Nixon doctrine.

Which isn't a doctrine that makes us world police.

That was the Nixon response to Truman's world police doctrine which sent us in to Korea to fight a war to stop North Korea's invasion of South Korea.

Our actions against Yemen aren't world police either.

We aren't defending another country in the world. We are literally defending our own ships and our own interests because they attacked us.

Inaction there will only send the message to the world that you get to attack the United States and we won't do anything about it.

Inaction would just lead to more attacks on our ships and our ability to trade.

It would mean if you want to destroy the United States because you are a rival nation and you want to be the dominant power in the world go ahead and do it because you can attack them and they don't do anything.
 
You still think the Arab world just engages in international terror because of the West sitting back and our inaction globally?

SMH.
I think that groups of people use asymmetric warfare against us especially our economic interests because they want to dominate us and the reason why they don't dominate us is because we won't let them.

It's like those people who are attacking Tesla cars so they lose value to hurt Elon Musk. They do that because they want to dominate Elon Musk.
 
We are literally defending our own ships and our own interests...

What ships? Our navy? Why does it need to be there? Or do you mean U.S. merchant marine vessels? Because, silly goose, there just aren't very many of those, and those young enough to venture that far are like hens' teeth. Dude, America taxes the snot out of stuff. The government obviously doesn't want American flagged vessels involved in world trade. Here, shut off the brainwashing and educate yourself:


Our interests? It always amazes me how many Republicans who would never, ever say that a burglar has a right to the Republican's stuff because he invested time and sweat casing the joint, defeating the alarm and the locks, and risked being shot to get it, will say that America has a vested interest in sovereign nations and their resources (no matter how far from any U.S. territory) because we've been playing at conquering them for years. Because that really is morally the same shit, bigger bully.

Bullies have always been able to justify their psychotic behavior. Do you play along because you wish you were buff enough to bully people, because you think you'll get in on the spoils, or do you really think there's some logic behind your quisling blather?
 
Bullies have always been able to justify their psychotic behavior. Do you play along because you wish you were buff enough to bully people, because you think you'll get in on the spoils, or do you really think there's some logic behind your quisling blather?

I think I have benefited from the spoils of not being dominated because that's a quantifiable thing and an objectively good thing.

Of course those bullying us and those that try to bully us don't think it's a good thing because they want to dominate us.

I agree with you on taxation and I don't want to be taxed by them.

The global economy effects me most stuff I buy is made in other countries.

Especially things I need most like my food supply since I eat a lot of vitamin and mineral supplements for my health.

30% of global container traffic normally goes through the red sea and therefore I don't want terrorists to dominate me by attacking my interests and my interests are to be able to source a supply of goods that I need from multiple sources because if one source controls the supply of goods that I need and that I have access to that source can dominate me and charge me whatever price they want.
 
Back
Top