Texas Sues Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin at Supreme Court over Election Rules

[TheCount]

This isn't about Trump.

If it's not about Trump, then why are they only suing those four states?

Do you think those four states are the only states which made those changes to their election procedures?

 

[Occam's Banana]

It wouldn't surprise me if Missouri does the same. It would hold more weight if a blue state did though.

XNN

https://twitter.com/Eric_Schmitt/status/1336506935982624768

 

[fedupinmo]

https://twitter.com/Eric_Schmitt/status/1336506935982624768

My email WORKED! God bless America and Eric Schmitt!

 

[familydog]

Dismissed. Texas has no standing to complain about another state's election procedures.

The States created the Supreme Court.

The States created the Constitution.

The States signed a contract on how each State will and will not operate. When one or more States violate that contract, the independent judicial body created by the States needs to remedy the situation.

 

[familydog]

If it's not about Trump, then why are they only suing those four states?

Do you think those four states are the only states which made those changes to their election procedures?

It is not about what changes were made to election laws. It is about who made the changes.

 

[Occam's Banana]

Some comments on the Texas suit:
(According to Margot Cleveland's Twitter bio, she is a "~25 yrs law clerk for 7th Cir[cuit]")

https://twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/1336401935012913162

https://twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/1336433347803967490

https://twitter.com/anonyfuss/status/1336455058825879552

https://twitter.com/RAHarrisonPA/status/1336415768557350914

 

[Occam's Banana]

Also (TI = "temporary injunction"):

https://twitter.com/Omer_Causey/status/1336535804521418753

 

[Contumacious]

The States created the Supreme Court.

The States created the Constitution.

The States signed a contract on how each State will and will not operate. When one or more States violate that contract, the independent judicial body created by the States needs to remedy the situation.

Exactly

 

[Contumacious]

Some comments on the Texas suit:
(According to Margot Cleveland's Twitter bio, she is a "~25 yrs law clerk for 7th Cir[cuit]")

https://twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/1336401935012913162

https://twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/1336433347803967490

https://twitter.com/anonyfuss/status/1336455058825879552

https://twitter.com/RAHarrisonPA/status/1336415768557350914

Respectfully disagree.

If the northern states had the right to attack the southern states in order to remind them that we are a Republic then Texas et al , has the right to return the favor.

Yes indeed.


.

 

[Sonny Tufts]

A more nuanced view of the suit by a law prof: https://reason.com/volokh/2020/12/0...ylvania-and-wisconsin-over-the-2020-election/

Tell-it-like-it-is comments from law profs: https://www.fastcompany.com/9058411...ack-on-texas-ags-attempt-to-overturn-election

 

[Occam's Banana]

https://twitter.com/Barnes_Law/status/1336413467960508417

 

[phill4paul]

SUPREME COURT RULED 6-3 TO TAKE UP THE ELECTION LAWSUIT FROM TEXAS

https://gellerreport.com/2020/12/su...take-up-the-election-lawsuit-from-texas.html/

Edit: Scratch that. It is on the docket. Early report was pre-mature.

 

[Contumacious]

https://twitter.com/Barnes_Law/status/1336413467960508417

Indeed.


And it is also well settled that where legal rights have been invaded, and a federal statute provides for a general right to sue for such invasion, federal courts may use any available remedy to make good the wrong done."

Bell v. Hood, 327 U.S. 678, 684 (1946).

 

[phill4paul]

Arkansas, Alabama, Florida, Kentucky, Mississippi, South Carolina, South Dakota Announce They’ve Joined Texas Election Fraud Lawsuit on SCOTUS Docket

https://gellerreport.com/2020/12/rk...election-fraud-lawsuit-on-scotus-docket.html/

 

[Contumacious]

Arkansas, Alabama, Florida, Kentucky, Mississippi, South Carolina, South Dakota Announce They’ve Joined Texas Election Fraud Lawsuit on SCOTUS Docket

https://gellerreport.com/2020/12/rk...election-fraud-lawsuit-on-scotus-docket.html/

 

[TheCount]

It is not about what changes were made to election laws. It is about who made the changes.

Such as the fact that judges allowed North Carolina's election board to extend its window for accepting absentee ballots beyond what was law?

Mysteriously, nobody has been talking about North Carolina in the month since the election. And they weren't sued by Texas.




Any guesses as to the reason behind that?

 

[familydog]

Any guesses as to the reason behind that?

Just one. The Supreme Court already ruled on these changes.

 

[Sonny Tufts]

SUPREME COURT RULED 6-3 TO TAKE UP THE ELECTION LAWSUIT FROM TEXAS

https://gellerreport.com/2020/12/su...take-up-the-election-lawsuit-from-texas.html/

Edit: Scratch that. It is on the docket. Early report was pre-mature.

Responses are due by 3 pm tomorrow. https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/texas-v-pennsylvania/

Can't wait to read them; they will cut Paxton a new one. They will no doubt point out the blatant hypocrisy (the legal term is "coming into court with unclean hands") of Texas, whose Governor Abbott moved up the start date of early voting by six days, contrary to statutory law.

 

[RJ Liberty]

Responses are due by 3 pm tomorrow. https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/texas-v-pennsylvania/

Can't wait to read them; they will cut Paxton a new one. They will no doubt point out the blatant hypocrisy (the legal term is "coming into court with unclean hands") of Texas, whose Governor Abbott moved up the start date of early voting by six days, contrary to statutory law.

I think you are correct. We shall see.

 

[Brian4Liberty]

Ron Paul discusses the Texas lawsuit at 22:15. Ron Paul explains why he supports it.


https://youtu.be/xRcMLVA4Mh8