Talk show host, Mike Reagan calls for anti war activist's murder

[Mini-Me]

Mini Me wrote:



Leonidas could not have been more correct.

And to the last sentence, isn't that happening now?

Not tens of thousands, and not every day, but enough people have been "rendered" to be "testing the waters".

And they may not be incompetent, but they are arrogant and haughty.

Pride and arrogance can undo you even faster than just plain old stupidity.

Indeed - but we're apparently still waiting for them to make some fatal mistake that swells our numbers to a critical mass.

 

[Anti Federalist]

Indeed - but we're apparently still waiting for them to make some fatal mistake that swells our numbers to a critical mass.

You won't get an argument from me on that.

There have been a number of incidents that I thought, for sure, would be that "fatal mistake". Each one seemed to bring a few more people into the fold, but not nearly enough for that critical mass to be reached.

Then again, revolutions that have massive public support usually don't work out so well.

 

[Mini-Me]

You won't get an argument from me on that.

There have been a number of incidents that I thought, for sure, would be that "fatal mistake". Each one seemed to bring a few more people into the fold, but not nearly enough for that critical mass to be reached.

Then again, revolutions that have massive public support usually don't work out so well.

Actually, that's one thing that scares me more than anything...most of the public likes socialism (Democrats like regular socialism, Republicans like national socialism). Even most people who oppose the police state don't understand the connection between economic freedom and political freedom. I've opposed the police state since I first became aware of it, but it took a lot longer to dispel my socialistic notions. If nonviolent revolution becomes impossible, and the government pushes the people as a whole toward violent revolution by going "too far" with their police state measures...what would the new government rising out of the ashes look like? Our Founding Fathers and Framers were unique in that they were the most influential people in colonial society, yet they also had such distinctive and genuine intellectual wisdom. Popular influence and intellectual wisdom almost seem mutually exclusive today. Today, our "intellectual" minds are our socialistic university professors, and you know as well as I what kind of people we actually vote into office. Any epiphany the majority of Americans have will most likely center only around restoration of the Bill of Rights rather than the rest of the Constitution and strictly limited government. If another Constitutional Convention were held today, could you imagine the socialistic direction it might take? It's sobering to think of what things would be defined as "rights," when they are really privileges of entitlement that infringe upon the natural rights of others. It just seems naively optimistic to me to assume that everyone will look to Ron Paul supporters for the answer.

 

[Anti Federalist]

Bump, waiting for youtube of Dice on Monday's show in which Reagan was supposed to "apologize".

 

[newyearsrevolution08]

There was an apology today BUT there was also alot of trying to push dice around with bullshit questions about "specific names" trying to corner dice into "something.

Reagan is a p.o.s. and I hope none of his listeners actually act on that threat. I do know however that one thing people forget about is that us "free loving ron paul" group is also filled with plenty of us who are MORE inline with the constitution and the 2nd amendment then most mccain and other supporters who THINK they are looking down on us.

If it came to it, we would win. We were not brainwashed and even those who MIGHT have been previously and are NOW on our side have once again woken up.

The revolution will continue and I am happy they consider us an underdog right now. We will NOT give up until we take our nation back whether peaceful or otherwise.

We are the ones in charge of our nation who TELL our government what WE want it to do for US.

 

[SeanEdwards]

Finding a market solution to punish Reagan and his employer/sponsors sounds like a good plan. However, if the FCC exists for any reason at all, it ought to exist to prevent the federally licensed radio frequencies from being used to conspire to commit murder. Demanding that the FCC revoke this stations broadcast license, or substantially fine the employer seems perfectly reasonable to me. Rejecting that notion out of fear that it empowers the "evil censorship beauracracy" seems to be a slippery slope fallacy. Demanding that the FCC enforce anti conspiracy laws on broadcasters does not automatically equal the FCC censoring the joke commentary of a Jon Stewart.

The genocide in Rwanda was initiated by extremist racist calls for Hutus to attack and kill their Tutsi neighbors on a Rwandan radio station. Free speech is an important right, but it should be used responsibly and inciting murder isn't responsible. Any maxim can be taken to the realm of absurdity, a behavior that seems common among libertarians.

 

[Anti Federalist]

Show clips here:

http://www.infowars.com/?p=2713

http://www.infowars.com/?p=2709

 

[Anti Federalist]

SE wrote:

The genocide in Rwanda was initiated by extremist racist calls for Hutus to attack and kill their Tutsi neighbors on a Rwandan radio station. Free speech is an important right, but it should be used responsibly and inciting murder isn't responsible. Any maxim can be taken to the realm of absurdity, a behavior that seems common among libertarians.

I don't think there are too many libertarians, myself included, who would find such speech, broadcast with government equipment and approval (as was the case in Rwanda) "protected".

 

[HOLLYWOOD]

Point to truly reference:

If you said the exact words Reagan did on the radio, about your neighbor, calling for the death of your neighbor to others and witnesses in your neighborhood...

I guaranteed you, there would be Law Enforcement at your door and you WILL BE ARRESTED. There's another of the double standards in the United Socialist of America.

Does Reagan have a Disclaimer on his show, like the Psychic Friends Hotline? This may be his way around saying anything... "For Entertainment Purposes Only" crap

 

[driller80545]

Sounds more like a neo con agenda to me. Sounds eerily similar to bush's axis of evil speeches

 

[Anti Federalist]

Point to truly reference:

If you said the exact words Reagan did on the radio, about your neighbor, calling for the death of your neighbor to others and witnesses in your neighborhood...

I guaranteed you, there would be Law Enforcement at your door and you WILL BE ARRESTED. There's another of the double standards in the United Socialist of America.

Does Reagan have a Disclaimer on his show, like the Psychic Friends Hotline? This may be his way around saying anything... "For Entertainment Purposes Only" crap

Exactly right.

I'm not so thin skinned to worry about the barbs and jabs of all the "haters" out there, and there are a lot of them.

It's this double standard that is completely unacceptable.

Couple this with fact that for months all you could hear about was Imus and whatever cracks he made and this has gotten ZERO I mean ZERO MSM airtime.

Meaning TPTB want this on the air.

And that's bad news for freedom folk of all stripes, regardless of what you think about 9/11.