Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 118,677
Good question...I don't know.
Taking things from white people
- Thread starter Anti Federalist
- Start date
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2007
- Messages
- 64,262
Anecdotally, I knew a white family that was attacked by a crazy black homeless guy in SF. The case was thrown out of court because the Police report categorized both the black guy and the white guy as Hispanic.
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2007
- Messages
- 64,262
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2007
- Messages
- 64,262
Not sure what language is being spoken here. Are these young ladies from a Muslim country, and now reside in Germany?
Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 118,677
Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 118,677
Chad Crowley
@CCrowley100
Let us consider the evolutionary psychology of White demographic erasure.
What drives a people to aid in their own undoing?
Why do so many Whites gleefully celebrate and actively participate in erasing their own people and the civilization that gave them life, exalting their decline as atonement for an undefined sin and mistaking surrender for moral grace?
The term “suicidal empathy” is frequently invoked, yet it misses the essence of the problem, the deeper cause of the malady itself. Empathy is a feeling, not a moral act. Altruism is that feeling made active, the outward movement of compassion into the world. The distinction matters, for an instinct that once strengthened kinship has been transformed into a behavior that destroys it.
The bane of Western civilization, and what defines the precarious condition of modern European man, is pathological altruism, a collective psychopathology in which instincts once vital to kin and tribe are projected outward without limit, even toward those who seek the giver’s ruin.
Although other groups, and one in particular, often exploit these vulnerabilities for their own advantage, the concern here is not with their agency but with the weakness that permits it. The purpose is to understand the psychological mechanisms that make such influence possible, to examine the vulnerability within the European mind that turns its moral faculties against itself.
Altruism evolved as a mechanism of genetic and social cohesion, binding individuals into stable groups capable of mutual defense and cooperation. From the standpoint of evolutionary biology, it followed the logic of kin selection and inclusive fitness: individuals aided those who shared their blood or whose cooperation enhanced the survival of the group.
Among European-descended peoples this impulse took a distinctive form shaped by the evolutionary pressures of Ice Age Europe. In that severe environment, survival depended less on extended kin networks and more on reciprocal cooperation among unrelated individuals. Trust, fairness, and empathy became essential to endure long winters and scarce resources. Over generations, these traits were internalized as moral instincts, producing a temperament oriented toward universal rules and abstract conscience rather than kin obligation. European communities became moral and ideological in nature, formed through shared belief and voluntary association, while the rest of the world continued to organize itself primarily along lines of kinship.
From these beginnings arose the Western inclination toward universality and abstraction. The Greek pursuit of eternal truth, the birth of philosophy and science, and the Christian conception of a single equalizing moral law—all expressed this orientation toward principles that transcended tribe and place. This tendency, once balanced by the demographic homogeneity of the premodern world and shared faith, became perilous when detached from them.
Over the centuries, these instincts were strengthened by Christianity, particularly through the Catholic Church’s regulation of marriage by enforcing monogamy and prohibiting cousin unions, and by the manorial order, which cultivated trust, fairness, and moral restraint within a cohesive and ethnically European world. Within those boundaries, altruism served the continuity of the group.
With the rise of the modern age, Enlightenment rationalism severed morality from ancestry, elevating abstraction from its theological roots into the realms of science, reason, and a nascent secular humanism. At the same time, the expansion of market economies displaced duty with profit. Individualism supplanted communal obligation, and freedom was redefined as separation from belonging. Under these conditions, the moral instincts that had once upheld cohesion lost their natural limits.
After the cessation of the great European Civil Wars in 1945, what contemporary historiography calls the First and Second World Wars, Western civilization was radically transformed. The destruction of the old order was not confined to political institutions but extended to the moral, spiritual, intellectual, cultural, and demographic foundations of the West itself. What had begun as a struggle for supremacy within Europe ended as a crisis of identity, leaving the victorious nations spiritually exhausted and morally disarmed before the world they had once led.
In the aftermath, the ideals that had once sustained its ascent were inverted and turned inward. The moral codes born of Christian charity, Enlightenment humanism, and aristocratic restraint were repurposed to glorify diversity for its own sake and to serve the interests of global commerce. Under the banners of tolerance and progress, mass immigration and cultural dissolution were elevated to moral imperatives. What had once expressed the creative genius of Europe became the instrument of its undoing. The same instincts that built Western civilization now expose it to exploitation in a world that no longer shares its moral code.
The psychological systems that sustained altruism, such as nurturance, guilt, and moral concern, were bounded by kin recognition—the innate capacity to identify and favor those who share one’s ancestry—and stabilized by the homogeneity of ancestral European populations. Within that setting, these instincts fostered unity and trust. Once the European world became populated by competing groups with divergent interests, these same moral reflexes lost their equilibrium and turned inward. What had once preserved unity now produced sentimentality and self-doubt, transforming a force of survival into an insidious mechanism of decay.
Modern European man lives in an environment that continually hijacks his inherited moral instincts. The media, the universities, the clergy, and in essence all the institutions that shape public opinion have moralized self-sacrifice until altruism has no limit. What was once a healthy impulse, compassion directed toward one’s own, has become a cult of self-denial. In behavioral terms, this is runaway signaling, a competition to demonstrate moral purity even when the display hastens ruin. The pain of the sacrifice becomes its validation.
This pattern spreads mimetically through imitation and prestige. Humans follow high-status models, and when those models proclaim that virtue lies in rejecting one’s own, what is popularly called virtue signaling, the rest conform. The result is prestige-biased learning that rewards disloyalty. Whites signal refinement and high status by disavowing their own people, reflected in the open contempt of Western elites for those they are meant to represent, as when Hillary Clinton dismissed ordinary Americans as a “basket of deplorables.” The same instinct that once shaped sexual selection, as seen in the peacock’s feathers, now governs moral behavior, producing displays without purpose or limit.
Contemporary research in personality psychology illuminates this condition. Traits in the Nurturance or Love dimension, associated with oxytocin and the neural circuits of empathy, exist along a continuum. Moderate levels promote cooperation; excessive levels produce dependency and self-abasement. Among Europeans, particularly in Northern and Western populations, this trait complex is more pronounced. Combined with high openness to experience and a tendency toward abstract moral reasoning, it yields a temperament unusually susceptible to ideological manipulation. The result is pathological altruism, behavior that feels virtuous yet inflicts harm on the very group that sustains it.
These traits once found equilibrium in homogeneity and shared belief. In earlier centuries, altruism elevated the standing of the individual within his own community. Today it grants prestige only when directed toward an abstract morality imposed from above. The one who apologizes for his heritage, that is, for his so-called “White privilege,” gains approval; the one who resists forfeits livelihood and reputation. The emotion that once bound families now enforces conformity.
The mechanism feeds upon itself. Pathological altruism rewards both vanity and fear. It provides the illusion of virtue while aligning the actor with authority. In this way, the moral instinct becomes a tool of power. The costlier the act of contrition, the more fully it signals submission. Over time, these displays grow increasingly extreme. Self-abasement is praised as enlightenment, while the preservation of ethnocultural continuity, and with it the demographic and structural homogeneity of the population, is condemned as sin.
The process begins in childhood. From the earliest years of education, Whites are immersed in narratives of inherited guilt, taught to view pride as aggression and loyalty as prejudice. Ethnocentrism, regarded as natural among all other peoples, is presented as a moral disease. The Frankfurt School first classified White ethnocentrism as the authoritarian personality par excellence, redefining the instinct for collective loyalty as a symptom of psychological disorder. The result is paralysis. To affirm White identity invites condemnation; to renounce it brings reward. Over time, the repeated association of belonging with shame corrodes the moral sense itself, until guilt becomes the only permissible form of self-recognition.
Religion deepened this pattern. Christianity, once it took root in Rome and spread through the West, was reshaped by the European spirit, absorbing elements of the Greco-Roman and Germanic worlds. It became, in its Western form, a moral and metaphysical order uniquely suited to the European mind. Over time, however, this synthesis was abstracted into a universal moral code detached from any particular people. Once removed from its ethnocultural foundation, its message of charity no longer fortified the community but began to dissolve it. The moral energy that once affirmed belonging was turned inward, transmuted into guilt and self-denial. The secular heirs of this faith replaced God with an ever-nebulous conception of Humanity and measured virtue by the degree of self-abasement. The altruistic instinct, severed from kin recognition, became an instrument of collective self-erasure.
The consequences extend into every realm of life. Immigration policy rewards demographic replacement, welfare systems punish independence and cultivate dependency, and elites condemn the instinct of ethnocultural preservation as a moral contagion to be purged, though only among Whites. The West has sanctified its own dissolution. The drives that once secured its vitality now consume it from within. Western civilization has become a body whose immune system turns against the organism it was meant to defend, even as it grows increasingly riddled with parasitic infection.
Pathological altruism is not natural, nor a product of sound reason, nor an instinct equally distributed among mankind, but a conditioned emotion unique in its expression among Whites. What is presented as a universal moral impulse is in truth a peculiarly European phenomenon, an inherited disposition severed from its natural boundaries and recast as a global ethic. It arises when the altruistic instincts of the European mind encounter an ideological order created to exploit them. The conscience experiences exaltation even as the people decline. Whites who resist this conditioning are not driven by hatred but by a healthy and rational sense of ethnic and collective pride, understanding that compassion without limit becomes submission, and that self-sacrifice without measure is another name for death.
The task is not to abolish altruism entirely, but to return it to its natural course, reorienting and channeling it toward its proper object: one’s own people, ensuring not only their continuity but their flourishing into the future. In nature every adaptation endures only through feedback, and when that equilibrium fails, degeneration follows. The same principle governs the moral life of a people. Compassion must once more serve those who are ours, our kith and kin, binding the living to the dead and the yet unborn from which they arise. A people that exalts strangers above its own children forfeits its posterity and lights its own funeral pyre.
Moral feeling must be joined once more with identity, and altruism must be firmly rooted in kinship. Without this alignment, European man, and with him Western civilization, will not fall to external foes but will be undone from within, consigned to the dustbin of history by the corruption of his own virtue.
@CCrowley100
Let us consider the evolutionary psychology of White demographic erasure.
What drives a people to aid in their own undoing?
Why do so many Whites gleefully celebrate and actively participate in erasing their own people and the civilization that gave them life, exalting their decline as atonement for an undefined sin and mistaking surrender for moral grace?
The term “suicidal empathy” is frequently invoked, yet it misses the essence of the problem, the deeper cause of the malady itself. Empathy is a feeling, not a moral act. Altruism is that feeling made active, the outward movement of compassion into the world. The distinction matters, for an instinct that once strengthened kinship has been transformed into a behavior that destroys it.
The bane of Western civilization, and what defines the precarious condition of modern European man, is pathological altruism, a collective psychopathology in which instincts once vital to kin and tribe are projected outward without limit, even toward those who seek the giver’s ruin.
Although other groups, and one in particular, often exploit these vulnerabilities for their own advantage, the concern here is not with their agency but with the weakness that permits it. The purpose is to understand the psychological mechanisms that make such influence possible, to examine the vulnerability within the European mind that turns its moral faculties against itself.
Altruism evolved as a mechanism of genetic and social cohesion, binding individuals into stable groups capable of mutual defense and cooperation. From the standpoint of evolutionary biology, it followed the logic of kin selection and inclusive fitness: individuals aided those who shared their blood or whose cooperation enhanced the survival of the group.
Among European-descended peoples this impulse took a distinctive form shaped by the evolutionary pressures of Ice Age Europe. In that severe environment, survival depended less on extended kin networks and more on reciprocal cooperation among unrelated individuals. Trust, fairness, and empathy became essential to endure long winters and scarce resources. Over generations, these traits were internalized as moral instincts, producing a temperament oriented toward universal rules and abstract conscience rather than kin obligation. European communities became moral and ideological in nature, formed through shared belief and voluntary association, while the rest of the world continued to organize itself primarily along lines of kinship.
From these beginnings arose the Western inclination toward universality and abstraction. The Greek pursuit of eternal truth, the birth of philosophy and science, and the Christian conception of a single equalizing moral law—all expressed this orientation toward principles that transcended tribe and place. This tendency, once balanced by the demographic homogeneity of the premodern world and shared faith, became perilous when detached from them.
Over the centuries, these instincts were strengthened by Christianity, particularly through the Catholic Church’s regulation of marriage by enforcing monogamy and prohibiting cousin unions, and by the manorial order, which cultivated trust, fairness, and moral restraint within a cohesive and ethnically European world. Within those boundaries, altruism served the continuity of the group.
With the rise of the modern age, Enlightenment rationalism severed morality from ancestry, elevating abstraction from its theological roots into the realms of science, reason, and a nascent secular humanism. At the same time, the expansion of market economies displaced duty with profit. Individualism supplanted communal obligation, and freedom was redefined as separation from belonging. Under these conditions, the moral instincts that had once upheld cohesion lost their natural limits.
After the cessation of the great European Civil Wars in 1945, what contemporary historiography calls the First and Second World Wars, Western civilization was radically transformed. The destruction of the old order was not confined to political institutions but extended to the moral, spiritual, intellectual, cultural, and demographic foundations of the West itself. What had begun as a struggle for supremacy within Europe ended as a crisis of identity, leaving the victorious nations spiritually exhausted and morally disarmed before the world they had once led.
In the aftermath, the ideals that had once sustained its ascent were inverted and turned inward. The moral codes born of Christian charity, Enlightenment humanism, and aristocratic restraint were repurposed to glorify diversity for its own sake and to serve the interests of global commerce. Under the banners of tolerance and progress, mass immigration and cultural dissolution were elevated to moral imperatives. What had once expressed the creative genius of Europe became the instrument of its undoing. The same instincts that built Western civilization now expose it to exploitation in a world that no longer shares its moral code.
The psychological systems that sustained altruism, such as nurturance, guilt, and moral concern, were bounded by kin recognition—the innate capacity to identify and favor those who share one’s ancestry—and stabilized by the homogeneity of ancestral European populations. Within that setting, these instincts fostered unity and trust. Once the European world became populated by competing groups with divergent interests, these same moral reflexes lost their equilibrium and turned inward. What had once preserved unity now produced sentimentality and self-doubt, transforming a force of survival into an insidious mechanism of decay.
Modern European man lives in an environment that continually hijacks his inherited moral instincts. The media, the universities, the clergy, and in essence all the institutions that shape public opinion have moralized self-sacrifice until altruism has no limit. What was once a healthy impulse, compassion directed toward one’s own, has become a cult of self-denial. In behavioral terms, this is runaway signaling, a competition to demonstrate moral purity even when the display hastens ruin. The pain of the sacrifice becomes its validation.
This pattern spreads mimetically through imitation and prestige. Humans follow high-status models, and when those models proclaim that virtue lies in rejecting one’s own, what is popularly called virtue signaling, the rest conform. The result is prestige-biased learning that rewards disloyalty. Whites signal refinement and high status by disavowing their own people, reflected in the open contempt of Western elites for those they are meant to represent, as when Hillary Clinton dismissed ordinary Americans as a “basket of deplorables.” The same instinct that once shaped sexual selection, as seen in the peacock’s feathers, now governs moral behavior, producing displays without purpose or limit.
Contemporary research in personality psychology illuminates this condition. Traits in the Nurturance or Love dimension, associated with oxytocin and the neural circuits of empathy, exist along a continuum. Moderate levels promote cooperation; excessive levels produce dependency and self-abasement. Among Europeans, particularly in Northern and Western populations, this trait complex is more pronounced. Combined with high openness to experience and a tendency toward abstract moral reasoning, it yields a temperament unusually susceptible to ideological manipulation. The result is pathological altruism, behavior that feels virtuous yet inflicts harm on the very group that sustains it.
These traits once found equilibrium in homogeneity and shared belief. In earlier centuries, altruism elevated the standing of the individual within his own community. Today it grants prestige only when directed toward an abstract morality imposed from above. The one who apologizes for his heritage, that is, for his so-called “White privilege,” gains approval; the one who resists forfeits livelihood and reputation. The emotion that once bound families now enforces conformity.
The mechanism feeds upon itself. Pathological altruism rewards both vanity and fear. It provides the illusion of virtue while aligning the actor with authority. In this way, the moral instinct becomes a tool of power. The costlier the act of contrition, the more fully it signals submission. Over time, these displays grow increasingly extreme. Self-abasement is praised as enlightenment, while the preservation of ethnocultural continuity, and with it the demographic and structural homogeneity of the population, is condemned as sin.
The process begins in childhood. From the earliest years of education, Whites are immersed in narratives of inherited guilt, taught to view pride as aggression and loyalty as prejudice. Ethnocentrism, regarded as natural among all other peoples, is presented as a moral disease. The Frankfurt School first classified White ethnocentrism as the authoritarian personality par excellence, redefining the instinct for collective loyalty as a symptom of psychological disorder. The result is paralysis. To affirm White identity invites condemnation; to renounce it brings reward. Over time, the repeated association of belonging with shame corrodes the moral sense itself, until guilt becomes the only permissible form of self-recognition.
Religion deepened this pattern. Christianity, once it took root in Rome and spread through the West, was reshaped by the European spirit, absorbing elements of the Greco-Roman and Germanic worlds. It became, in its Western form, a moral and metaphysical order uniquely suited to the European mind. Over time, however, this synthesis was abstracted into a universal moral code detached from any particular people. Once removed from its ethnocultural foundation, its message of charity no longer fortified the community but began to dissolve it. The moral energy that once affirmed belonging was turned inward, transmuted into guilt and self-denial. The secular heirs of this faith replaced God with an ever-nebulous conception of Humanity and measured virtue by the degree of self-abasement. The altruistic instinct, severed from kin recognition, became an instrument of collective self-erasure.
The consequences extend into every realm of life. Immigration policy rewards demographic replacement, welfare systems punish independence and cultivate dependency, and elites condemn the instinct of ethnocultural preservation as a moral contagion to be purged, though only among Whites. The West has sanctified its own dissolution. The drives that once secured its vitality now consume it from within. Western civilization has become a body whose immune system turns against the organism it was meant to defend, even as it grows increasingly riddled with parasitic infection.
Pathological altruism is not natural, nor a product of sound reason, nor an instinct equally distributed among mankind, but a conditioned emotion unique in its expression among Whites. What is presented as a universal moral impulse is in truth a peculiarly European phenomenon, an inherited disposition severed from its natural boundaries and recast as a global ethic. It arises when the altruistic instincts of the European mind encounter an ideological order created to exploit them. The conscience experiences exaltation even as the people decline. Whites who resist this conditioning are not driven by hatred but by a healthy and rational sense of ethnic and collective pride, understanding that compassion without limit becomes submission, and that self-sacrifice without measure is another name for death.
The task is not to abolish altruism entirely, but to return it to its natural course, reorienting and channeling it toward its proper object: one’s own people, ensuring not only their continuity but their flourishing into the future. In nature every adaptation endures only through feedback, and when that equilibrium fails, degeneration follows. The same principle governs the moral life of a people. Compassion must once more serve those who are ours, our kith and kin, binding the living to the dead and the yet unborn from which they arise. A people that exalts strangers above its own children forfeits its posterity and lights its own funeral pyre.
Moral feeling must be joined once more with identity, and altruism must be firmly rooted in kinship. Without this alignment, European man, and with him Western civilization, will not fall to external foes but will be undone from within, consigned to the dustbin of history by the corruption of his own virtue.
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2007
- Messages
- 64,262
The honest and altruistic nature of Northern European whites and their descendants is not universal. Most of the rest of the word is dog eat dog, with some glaring exceptions (like Japan).
White people really are the problem. Suicidal empathy. Pathological altruism. Fatally naïve.
nikcers
Member
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2015
- Messages
- 15,218
Japanese culture has in groups which was something you saw in World War 2.
They would eagerly sacrifice themselves in battle with their kamikaze planes famously because they were doing it for their family.
They knew that if they were to return home alive but defeated in battle their whole family would be dishonered.
They fought to preserve their people and that only works in a country where your culture is dominant.
It doesn't work when a majority of the country wants to destroy your people and don't see themselves as part of your group.
Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 118,677
Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 118,677
Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 118,677
Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 118,677
Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 118,677
TheTexan
Member
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2011
- Messages
- 28,158
Its only reaaonable to assume that 1000 years of civilizational progress has probably caused whites to naturally select their DNA for those well suited to that environment,
And it's only reasonable to assume that 1000 years of brutal tribal warfare has caused those races to naturally select their DNA for those well suited to that environment
Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 118,677
Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 118,677
Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 118,677
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2007
- Messages
- 64,262
Not sure where to drop this...
"Hall of Shame: The H-1B Kickback Machine
This isn’t about “cheap labor.” It’s about a giant money-laundering scheme disguised as staffing.
• Fake jobs. Body shops file for H-1Bs by the thousands. Many of the jobs don’t exist or are inflated. Workers are benched, shuffled around, or assigned to “clients” that are just shells.
• Kickbacks. Once here, workers are trapped. To keep their visa, they quietly pay cash back to the sponsor or “training fees” to keep a fake paycheck moving. The firm takes a cut off both ends.
• Fake billing. American clients get billed through layers of vendors. Each layer siphons off more money. What looks like IT support is actually a skimmed contract padded for kickbacks.
• Money laundering. The profits get cleaned through shell companies and shipped offshore. It looks like “consulting” or “marketing,” but it’s really kickbacks being washed into tax havens.
And here’s the part they never tell you: lobbyists are paid millions to keep this pipeline open. They wine and dine Congress to make sure federal and state contracts funnel back to the same H-1B-heavy body shops. Taxpayer money and corporate budgets alike are drained to feed a system that costs more than it saves.
This isn’t “immigration policy.” It’s organized wage suppression and white-collar racketeering with political protection. The worker gets trapped. The American gets locked out. The middleman gets rich.
America First means cutting off the kickback pipeline. No more fake jobs. No more shell vendors. No more lobbyists buying laws that keep the scam alive.
Share this so people understand: the H-1B system isn’t just broken, it’s corrupt by design."
"Hall of Shame: The H-1B Kickback Machine
This isn’t about “cheap labor.” It’s about a giant money-laundering scheme disguised as staffing.
• Fake jobs. Body shops file for H-1Bs by the thousands. Many of the jobs don’t exist or are inflated. Workers are benched, shuffled around, or assigned to “clients” that are just shells.
• Kickbacks. Once here, workers are trapped. To keep their visa, they quietly pay cash back to the sponsor or “training fees” to keep a fake paycheck moving. The firm takes a cut off both ends.
• Fake billing. American clients get billed through layers of vendors. Each layer siphons off more money. What looks like IT support is actually a skimmed contract padded for kickbacks.
• Money laundering. The profits get cleaned through shell companies and shipped offshore. It looks like “consulting” or “marketing,” but it’s really kickbacks being washed into tax havens.
And here’s the part they never tell you: lobbyists are paid millions to keep this pipeline open. They wine and dine Congress to make sure federal and state contracts funnel back to the same H-1B-heavy body shops. Taxpayer money and corporate budgets alike are drained to feed a system that costs more than it saves.
This isn’t “immigration policy.” It’s organized wage suppression and white-collar racketeering with political protection. The worker gets trapped. The American gets locked out. The middleman gets rich.
America First means cutting off the kickback pipeline. No more fake jobs. No more shell vendors. No more lobbyists buying laws that keep the scam alive.
Share this so people understand: the H-1B system isn’t just broken, it’s corrupt by design."
Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 118,677
Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 118,677
Gofundme set up for Bridgeview man killed at Oswego Chick-fil-A - Desplaines Valley News
A gofundme account for a Bridgeview man killed last week at the Oswego Chick-fil-A has raised more than $20,000 as of Sunday
southwestregionalpublishing.com
Similar threads
