Taking things from white people

[Anti Federalist]

 

[Anti Federalist]

 

[Anti Federalist]

//

 

[CaptUSA]

So, let me get this straight... Walmart is going to lock up the cosmetics, electronics, and snack food, but they're going to keep these theft machines running??? Yeah, it won't be long.

 

[Anti Federalist]

//

 

[Anti Federalist]

 

[Anti Federalist]

Sailer's Law applies when no info on suspects is given.

 

[Anti Federalist]

 

[Anti Federalist]

 

[Anti Federalist]

 

[Anti Federalist]

 

[acptulsa]

What did they take from white people? Are you saying Rayshaude was white?

 

[Anti Federalist]

What did they take from white people? Are you saying Rayshaude was white?

They took the facts from White people.

The majority of mass shooters are black, by large margins.

That is not the impression you would get from the MMOs, the Congressional Black Caucus or the political ruling class in general, just to name a few.

 

[Anti Federalist]

Nice house, nice neighborhood, White man shot and killed, most likely the owner.

I'll watch this one and see if a description of the suspects pops up.

 

[Anti Federalist]

 

[Anti Federalist]

 

[Anti Federalist]

 

[Anti Federalist]

 

[Anti Federalist]

Patrick J. Buchanan:

 

[Anti Federalist]

Chad Crowley

@CCrowley100

1/ As more people awaken to the realization that the twentieth century was not a march of progress toward a utopian end of history but a carefully managed illusion, the official narrative begins to unravel.

Beneath its polished veneer lies a record not of moral clarity but of deception, betrayal, and orchestrated catastrophe. Among these illusions, none is more sacrosanct, more zealously defended, than the myth of the Second World War, the so-called “Good War.”

But what did that “Good War” truly achieve? In the words of Patrick J. Buchanan, whose reflection is shown below, the Second World War extinguished the last embers of Western ascendancy. All the great houses of continental Europe fell. The empires that once ruled the globe vanished. Birthrates collapsed. Peoples of European ancestry have been in demographic decline for generations. The spiritual confidence that once drove the West was replaced by exhaustion and disinheritance. The Allies may have won on the battlefield, but the civilization they claimed to defend did not survive the victory.

With this in mind, it becomes easier to understand why a serious body of historical work emerged after 1945 and was immediately subjected to suppression, censorship, and denunciation. These books, written by generals, diplomats, journalists, defectors, and independent historians, challenge every sacred premise of the official narrative.

For decades, they were buried or discredited by a powerful alliance of media monopolies, academic gatekeepers, and elites and institutions motivated by a wide range of financial, political, and ethnic interests, and often by their convergence, all determined to preserve the mythology of the “Good War.”

Only with the rise of social media and the weakening grip of legacy power structures has this alternative historiography begun to reach a broader audience. Its revival is not accidental. It reflects the slow collapse of the ideological consensus that once rendered dissent unthinkable.

To continue laying waste to the phony narrative, we must turn to the books that have dared to question it. In the thread below, I will be examining books that explore the origins of the war in Europe and the political decisions in Great Britain that helped transform a regional conflict into a global catastrophe, one that has shaped and continues to shape the political, demographic, cultural, economic, and moral character of a Western world in decline.