acptulsa
Member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2008
- Messages
- 77,243
And if said as much, I'd be called a racist.
The word does stifle conversation, doesn't it?
But in the meantime, let me ask why does this happen.
Is it racist to say humans can be bred for certain traits, same as any other animal? Does the fact that this can be done with any color human known to man have any effect on whether that statement is marked racist? Has not one of the justifications used for capital punishment over centuries been eliminating the "bad seed"?
Decades of the welfare state has produced millions of fatherless, grandfatherless and great-grandfatherless children. Don't roll your eyes at the conspiracy theorist again; I don't know if it was done on purpose. But it was done. There was real financial incentive for welfare queens to kick the man out. Furthermore, the underclass thus created aren't all black, and it isn't just the black ones causing trouble.
Truth is, there could be a local difference between the races nonetheless. Free people who can't support children have never been encouraged to reproduce before, while slaves have always been encouraged to increase the master's wealth of "property". The only ones who reproduced less were the ones who had reservations about bringing another life into that hell. That is a local phenomenon, and no reflection on how these groups might have evolved where there was no slavery, or another group was subjected to it.
These facts have been mentioned before...
You accused me in another thread of overthinking this psyop. Well, we had better start thinking because they haven't done a half-assed job of thinking it through. Blacks are where they're at because of institutional racism. We all recoil from that. But what about it? What about all the "paternal" (more maternal if you ask me) attempts to "take care of" blacks? We've already established that white libs are racist as hell. Did you catch Gov. Whatsername of New Yawk? "Oh the poor, darling little pickaninnies don't even know what a computer is!" We recoil from the accusation that institutional racism has done much to make things the way they are today, but it's the liberals who decided Darwin was a meanie and we should ensure every spindly, limp runt of the litter survives. They accuse themselves. If there is any difference in the races, for the last hundred years liberal meddling has been driving the selection process. Not slavemasters. Not Darwin.
This is why we need to stop focusing on race. These NGOs aren't. You're told otherwise. Constantly. But they're being paid to traffic criminals. And that's what they're doing -- in a variety of colors. What we need is to figure out how to set the sensible people free, and figure out what to do with the criminals.
Last edited:
