Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 118,704
Why would you even bother?
You know what Taylor is going to say, same as me.
You do not believe in nations or countries or national traditions.
I would not expect you to have any other response.
Nationalism, communism, it's all the same to me, so it should be no wonder why I answer the way that I do. When I place my hand over my heart, it's more than likely because I had one too many chicken wings and hopped on the bike before I had a chance to digest ;-)
$#@!...I broke the bike out a week ago, had one day that was passable and it's been wet and cold since.
Ron Paul's own words:
https://www.outsidethebeltway.com/r...have-voted-against-the-1964-civil-rights-act/
Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) suggested Friday that he wouldn’t have voted in favor of the 1964 Civil Rights Act if he were a member of Congress at the time.
Paul, the libertarian Texas Republican who formally announced Friday that he would seek the presidency for a third time, said he thought Jim Crow laws were illegal, and warned against turning strict libertarians into demagogues.
MSNBC anchor Chris Matthews pressed Paul during a TV appearance on whether he would have voted against the ’64 law, a landmark piece of legislation that took strides toward ending segregation.
“Yeah, but I wouldn’t vote against getting rid of the Jim Crow laws,” Paul said. He explained that he would have opposed the Civil Rights Act “because of the property rights element, not because they got rid of the Jim Crow laws.”
Paul’s son, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), faced criticism during his campaign for Senate last fall because of similar remarks he made, also during an appearance on MSNBC. Rand Paul had advanced a similar argument about property rights, and, under political pressure, issued a follow-up statement in which he voiced support for the 1964 Civil Rights Act, and would not support any efforts to repeal it.
Getting rid of Jim Crow laws, which Ron Paul said he would not vote against, is what allowed the desegregation of public schools.
Budgets that passed with veto proof majorities.It looks like various institutions began paying people to immigrate here with money from budgets Trump signed. And I don't see any excuse for that; Trump would never sign anything his lawyers didn't read for him if his own money were involved.
Is there any point in trying to talk to you about that?
Budgets that passed with veto proof majorities.
Do you have the same bike or something else?
It's been raining just about non-stop here as well. I hear out west they have been getting slammed pretty hard with over 40(?) independent tornados, from Texas on up. Well, I sold the bike which I totally regret, so I've had to rent when I feel like riding. I don't know if I want to build another, or just buy one. I'm very partial to the Indian Roadmaster, but if I can find a Hard Bike somewhere (no longer made) I'd opt for that just the same. Otherwise I'll just scrounge up stuff, break out the welder, paint gun and stuff it with a 115ci.
Who needs a suspect description? If the perp were to be caught, the DA would just cut it loose. Just let the cops spend that time in the donut shop.
Who needs a suspect description? If the perp were to be caught, the DA would just cut it loose. Just let the cops spend that time in the donut shop.
We don't have Jim Crow laws and I never said we should bring them back.
And getting rid of Jim Crow didn't desegragate, forced desegregation desegragated, schools were forced to bus kids around town to different neighborhoods to mix up all the different demographics.