'Sweden, who would believe this?': Trump cites non-existent terror attack

except trump didnt say terrorist attack. He just said look at what happened in sweden last night. Nothing abotu terror attack. Fake news says he said terror attack, and then said he lied.

"Look what happened in Sweden LAST NIGHT. Sweden!"

So what part of "last night" do we not understand? Trump DID say that. It's recorded and not "fake news".
 
"Look what happened in Sweden LAST NIGHT. Sweden!"

So what part of "last night" do we not understand? Trump DID say that. It's recorded and not "fake news".

Trump was completely unspecific about what happened in Sweden "last night." He did say, however, that Sweden "took in large numbers; they're having problems like they never thought possible..." It seems highly likely that he misspoke and probably had actually watched Tucker Carlson's piece on Sweden immigration that occurred the night before ("last night"). So people in social media and elsewhere who say Trump claimed there was a terrorist incident in Sweden Friday night are making unsubstantiated claims.
 
He was fearmongering hard in that speech. That always serves the end of strengthening the police state.
 
Last edited:
"Look what happened in Sweden LAST NIGHT. Sweden!"

So what part of "last night" do we not understand? Trump DID say that. It's recorded and not "fake news".

The fake news is saying he said a terrorist attack happened. He didn't. You guys simply do not understand how President Trump operates. Sweden is quite the talk of the town now, do you know what for?

I love the fits that Trump trolls throw any time anyone criticizes the regime.

This isn't criticizing, it's a lie. President Trump never said terrorist attack. People who understand President Trump understand what he just did, and why he said it.

I know why, and I could understand criticism against it, if it came from understanding of why. But instead, its just a bunch of "OMG!, Trump lied, kind of, not really."

Robert68 has the best criticism of it.

You, CPUd, Ender, and Zippy, just mindlessly parrot the lie, and you missed out on the why. So you criticize the lie that wasn't, fail, and fail for an opportunity for real criticism. And do you know why? You really aren't smart enough to know how to level criticism. You guys are President Trump's useful idiots! Did you know Breitbart helped found Huffington Post? He spent years setting it up. Do you know why he did that?

If you research it, you'll see how big of idiots you four really are. You are being used by your enemy, fools. It's laughable.
 
Last edited:
The fake news is saying he said a terrorist attack happened. He didn't. You guys simply do not understand how President Trump operates. Sweden is quite the talk of the town now, do you know what for?



This isn't criticizing, it's a lie. President Trump never said terrorist attack. People who understand President Trump understand what he just did, and why he said it. You, CPUd, Ender, and Zippy, just mindlessly parrot the lie, and you missed out on the why. So you criticize the lie that wasn't, fail, and fail for an opportunity for real criticism. And do you know why? You really aren;t smart enough to know how to level criticism. You guys are President Trump's useful idiots. Did you know Breitbart help found Huffington Post? He spent years setting it up. Do you know why he did that?

If you research it, you'll see how big of idiots you four really are. You are being used by your enemy, fools.

I know why, and I could understand criticism against it, if it came from understanding of why. But instead, its just a bunch of "OMG!, Trump lied, kind of, not really."

Robert68 has the best criticism of it.

Do you believe "diversity" is a code word for "white genocide"?
 
The fake news is saying he said a terrorist attack happened. He didn't. You guys simply do not understand how President Trump operates. Sweden is quite the talk of the town now, do you know what for?



This isn't criticizing, it's a lie. President Trump never said terrorist attack. People who understand President Trump understand what he just did, and why he said it.

I know why, and I could understand criticism against it, if it came from understanding of why. But instead, its just a bunch of "OMG!, Trump lied, kind of, not really."

Robert68 has the best criticism of it.

You, CPUd, Ender, and Zippy, just mindlessly parrot the lie, and you missed out on the why. So you criticize the lie that wasn't, fail, and fail for an opportunity for real criticism. And do you know why? You really aren't smart enough to know how to level criticism. You guys are President Trump's useful idiots! Did you know Breitbart helped found Huffington Post? He spent years setting it up. Do you know why he did that?

If you research it, you'll see how big of idiots you four really are. You are being used by your enemy, fools. It's laughable.

I never said: "Trump lied oh my gerwd!!!" I quoted exactly what he said- and my question is: what in the hell was that? What about Sweden last night?

And quit with the name-calling- I've had enough of that shit.

And I agree about Robert68. ;)
 
Do you believe "diversity" is a code word for "white genocide"?

No. Look at my post history, and don't accuse me of being a racist again. It's quite liberal on race issues.

But go ahead, call me a racist. The strategy (the grand one, not your personal one) is working brilliantly.

Do you know what a fascist is? He is a reactionary. Do you know how he gains power? By marginalizing a group and attacking it. You think Muslims are the only group on the crosshairs?

Nope, he is going after the dumb activists and dumb keyboard commandos too, (if you were smart, you could avoid it, but instead, you just prove who you are. He is casting light on all the demons, the liars, and the deceivers). The entire media deception campaign is in his crosshairs, and he is doing that putin kung fu shit. He is using his enemies against themselves. He defeated the entire MSM. And he is letting them dig their own graves too. Double entendre indeed. Line up, shills. Don't forget your towels.
 
No. Look at my post history, and don't accuse me of being a racist again. It's quite liberal on race issues.

But go ahead, call me a racist. The strategy (the grand one, not your personal one) is working brilliantly.

Do you know what a fascist is? He is a reactionary. Do you know how he gains power? By marginalizing a group and attacking it. You think Muslims are the only group on the crosshairs?

Nope, he is going after the dumb activists and dumb keyboard commandos too, (if you were smart, you could avoid it, but instead, you just prove who you are. He is casting light on all the demons, the liars, and the deceivers). The entire media deception campaign is in his crosshairs, and he is doing that putin kung fu shit. He is using his enemies against themselves. He defeated the entire MSM. And he is letting them dig their own graves too. Double entendre indeed. Line up, shills. Don't forget your towels.

In your opinion, who's doing the raping?
 
In your opinion, who's doing the raping?

I have a post history. Indeed, I think the Cologne rapes came up a year ago. Many were saying it was all Muslims, and I was saying that is ridiculous, because white guys rape on new years eve too.

But you brought up the word, didn't you? Trump didn't say terrorist attack, but he didn't say rape either. Which one did the world hear? Not the one you, and your MSM lackeys spoke.

Befuddled and fidoodled again, CPUd.
 
I have a post history. Indeed, I think the Cologne rapes came up a year ago. Many were saying it was all Muslims, and I was saying that is ridiculous, because white guys rape on new years eve too.

But you brought up the word, didn't you? Trump didn't say terrorist attack, but he didn't say rape either. Which one did the world hear? Not the one you, and your MSM lackeys spoke.

Befuddled and fidoodled again, CPUd.

It was a simple question
 
He never said or mentioned a terror attack. Thanks for spreading fake news Zippy.

When the next sentences are talking about places that are well known Terror attacks it's only natural to assume he was talking about terror attacks in Sweden.
At least in this case he was only insinuating an attack, not totally made up like Bowling Green.
 
Do you have any idea why, idealist? Do you know the realist reason why? Of course you don't.

Do I know the real reason [MENTION=26680]robert68[/MENTION] said:

He was fearmongering hard in that speech. That always serves the end of strengthening the police state.

Of course.

Trump is a police-state-kinda-guy and fear helps him keep the populace filled with fear and in compliance.
 

Especially when the media tells them that is what to assume. But you forget, the media is hated by a large majority of Americans. So they didn't believe the media, and instead found the real message sent.

And I'd like to help you guys out more, and let you understand, but the deep state is the real enemy, and you all its unwitting lackeys. It's about helping trumps state defeat the deep state, or the deep state defeating the trump state. Both end up a police state upon victory, but I assure you the Trump police state is far preferable to the deep police state win.
 
Back
Top