Survey Reveals Growing Ranks of "No Religion" Population

FrankRep

Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2007
Messages
28,885
Survey Reveals Growing Ranks of "No Religion" Population


James Heiser | The New American
22 September 2009


The most recent in a series of surveys of American Religious Identification conducted by Trinity College reveals that the number of Americans with no religious identification continues to climb.

The USA Today reports:


Americans who don't identify with any religion are now 15% of the USA, but trends in a new study shows they could one day surpass the nation's largest denominations — including Catholics, now 24% of the nation.

American Nones: Profile of the No Religion Population, to be released today by Trinity College, finds this faith-free group already includes nearly 19% of U.S. men and 12% of women. Of these, 35% say they were Catholic at age 12.​


Not surprisingly, the disproportionate defection of American Catholics to the category of “Nones” was particularly highlighted by the Catholic News Agency:


About half came from a family where both parents identified with the same religion, while 17 percent came from a family where neither parent did so. Only 32 percent of current Nones said they had no religion at age 12, meaning that about two-thirds were raised with a religion.

Around 24 percent of Nones identified as Catholic at age 12, compared to 26 percent of the general population, the report says. However, former Catholics make up 35 percent of new Nones, the largest single group.​


Previous surveys of American Religious Identification were conducted in 1990 and 2001. The sample size (54,461 respondents in the latest survey) provides a much more statistically significant data than is utilized in most polls. But the simple truth is that the accuracy of the survey could easily be verified by a visit to almost any church in America on a Sunday morning. In most circumstances, Christians are conscious every week of the decline in religious identification. As the decision to “stay home” on Sunday carries less and less social stigma, fewer people feel any social pressure to go through the motions of attending church services.

The growth of impersonal, often entertainment-oriented mega-churches are actually a sign of the sickness of churches in America, not a sign of renewed vitality — let alone a model for future growth. The lack of spiritual accountability taken for granted in such mass assemblies, as well as the lack of depth of the teaching (and the inability of those who attend such churches to recognize the vacuity of what is being served up on Sundays) and the “consumer” orientation of every decision from style of service to the structure of the facilities to the non-worship programs offered by mega-churches make it clear that many of the concerns driving such assemblies are far removed from those of historic Christianity.

It is not that Americans are suddenly becoming atheists; rather, the percentage of atheists among the “Nones” has remained essentially constant. Rather, in the words of lead researcher Barry Kosmin, "They're a stew of agnostics, deists and rationalists. They sound more like Thomas Jefferson and Tom Paine. Their very interesting enlightenment approach is like the Founding Fathers' kind: Skeptical about organized religion and clerics while still holding to an idea of God." Of course, it could be observed that the abysmal lack of morals taken for granted in modern society would have made an “Enlightenment”-era deist blush.

One slightly less bleak fact revealed by the study is that “the 1990s was the decade when the ‘secular boom’ occurred — each year 1.3 million more adult Americans joined the ranks of the Nones. Since 2001 the annual increase has halved to 660,000 a year.” One would like to think that the events of recent years might have cooled the allure of the altar of Mammon to some degree, but researchers have been fooled before in this regard, as anyone who remembers the boomlet of religious observance post-9/11 can easily attest.

The fundamental problem of religious identification is that post-modern Americans have a very shallow understanding of the significance of mutually exclusive-truth claims and thus make up their own choplogic religious views and affirm that it is their sovereign right to assent to the Humpty Dumpty hermeneutic set forth in Lewis Carroll’s Through the Looking Glass:


"When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less."
"The question is," said Alice, "whether you can make words mean so many different things."
"The question is," said Humpty Dumpty, "which is to be master — that's all."​


Affirming their mastery, the growing ranks of the Nones have decided to find their own path — a path that usually leads to the pool of Narcissus.


SOURCE:
http://www.thenewamerican.com/index...als-growing-ranks-of-qno-religionq-population
 
Hey, that's me. I quit catholicism at age 12. For a while considered myself an Atheist, and eventually settled on a more esoteric understanding about halfway between Mahayana Buddhism and Jedi, with a healthy respect for the original teachings of Jesus/Yeshua, but pretty scornful of Saul/Paul.
 
I disagree. It was the birth of my own ability to use reason and logic and see the inconsistencies in what was taught at my church.
 
The fact of the matter is that secular humanism has permeated our society and it started by design in our school system. It came into full force in the 1960s. It's all documented in the fine book "The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America".
 
The fact of the matter is that secular humanism has permeated our society and it started by design in our school system. It came into full force in the 1960s. It's all documented in the fine book "The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America".

I hear ya, and i know you have a good point.

I'm totally against government and public schools, but not against the concept of "no religion", as a reasonable and moral way of life. :)
 
I think the trend is more towards Nihilism than Narcissism. Or maybe the OP really meant Narcissism, and was being the master of his vocabulary... :D
 
There are hundreds. I have not the time to go into each one. Just Google "Biblical Inconsistencies" and you'll keep yourself busy for days.

I now refer to myself as a gnostic Christian, and I got there through Bible Study and Prayer, just like the church told me to do.

Now I have to either accept that God is simply the Loving Father that Yeshua taught about and that when I prayed for "bread" (the Truth) God gave me what I asked for. Otherwise I have to deceive myself concerning actual historical events and believe in a God that only gives "bread" to those who belong to the right church, which would make Yeshua a liar, which leaves me with nothing to believe in at all.

Focusing on the simple Gospel as taught by Yeshua is much easier than the mental gymnastics you have to perform to belong to the "orthodox" club.
 
Maybe the reason is because people are finally starting to recognize that science is a good thing.

This is all due to indoctrination of secular humanism in public schools.

Yeah. If only they had spent more time being indoctrinated in church. :rolleyes:
 
Absolutely. It's discouraging to see how many of the young, free thinkers in our ranks have fallen for this hook, line and sinker.

If God was a real and present force in the lives of those around them, it wouldn't matter if "secular humanism" was taught in schools.

Religion is taught - God is experienced.
 
Maybe the reason is because people are finally starting to recognize that science is a good thing.



Yeah. If only they had spent more time being indoctrinated in church.

Government and Science have to be defined by temporal principles. The metaphysical is highly subjective, each person experiences God through the filter of their own needs and goals. Laws and scientific theory can not be based on the metaphysical, that's just common sense.
 
The metaphysical is highly subjective, each person experiences feelings through the filter of their own needs and goals. Laws and scientific theory can not be based on feelings, that's just common sense.

Fixed that for ya. ;)
 
If God was a real and present force in the lives of those around them, it wouldn't matter if "secular humanism" was taught in schools.

Religion is taught - God is experienced.

I think you underestimate how weak the human soul actually is, especially in the young who are surrounded with messages of instant gratification and shallow, single-minded thought more than any other time in history.

Teaching only biological science serves to dehumanize us - turns us into nothing, really.

Learning political science makes it clear that the bigger the government, the smaller the church.

Kids spend 9 hours a day in school, 3 hours a day with their parents, and 1 hour a week (maybe) in church. Unless you're willing to turn into an absolute fundamentalist, you don't stand a chance of developing a child who can think outside the confines of the physical world.

I'm not even religious, but I can see quite clearly that the hysteria over creationism is too irrational to be anything except dangerous.
 
YouTube - Irrefutable Proof of Evolution- Part 1 (mtDNA, ERVs, Fusion)
YouTube - Proof of Evolution - Part 2 (Summation)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DbI2diGTJFw
YouTube - Proof of Evolution - Part 4 Embryology

indoctrination = teaching someone to accept doctrines uncritically
As you see in those videos, evolution, for example, it is accepted CRITICALLY. The only people who get into circular arguments and just use a book with no proof to justify themselves are religious people and this is why religion has no place in schools and just in the church.

YouTube - Why Teaching Creationism is a Horrible Idea


Here are my questions for religious people.
1. Would you be able to enjoy Heaven knowing that people you love are tormented in Hell?

2. . How come so many times the all-knowing God doesn't seem to have a clue whats gonna happen and has to double check things?

3. How do you justify God punishing Adam and Eve for something the did before having any knowledge about good and evil?

4. What will happen in the Afterlife to the people who never heard about your religion?

5. How do you justify an infinite punishment for a finite crime? Especially from a loving God.

6. How can you have free will if God is omniscient? This means that he knows the decisions you will make, hence you don't really have free will.

7. How come you consider people to have free will considering some decisions lead to eternal torture? It's like saying you have the right to free speech, but if you say X, you will get your hand cut off. Sure, you have the right to free speech, right?

Actually if religion would be subject to the same proof standard as science, it would have been proven as false hence the Sun was "created" before the Earth and the Earth isn't the center of the universe.
 
Back
Top