***SUPER BROCHURE PROJECT Idaho***

[alucard13mmfmj]

If calculations are correct he made enough to buy a house or two.

A LOT of beer and cookies. hehe.

Did they make more of these brochuers recently? If so... I don't know what to say =|. They should focus on Foreign Policy and Entitlments. Make new brochures on those subjects after they sell the ones they have. If they going to make a shit load of money, they might as well sell something that gets more votes than lose.

 

[bluesc]

A LOT of beer and cookies. hehe.

Did they make more of these brochuers recently? If so... I don't know what to say =|. They should focus on Foreign Policy and Entitlments. Make new brochures after they sell the ones they have.

I think he should get out of the business entirely.

Not only is he being paid to hurt Ron's chances -- it's Ron Paul supporters paying him to do it!

 

[mmadness]

http://www.dailypaul.com/214943/idaho-mailing-of-super-brochures

Daily Paul Thread for all to downvote, plus upvote warning posts.

 

[LibertyEagle]

I'm just going to say this once, but if any of you have proof that these took votes away from Ron Paul, contact ronpaulproducts.

http://www.ronpaulproducts.com/contact.html

 

[LibertyEagle]

double post

 

[mmadness]

For the 342,438th time...

From Aaron Jones, experienced Ron Paul grassroots activist, creator of iRoots.org & involved with RevPac:
http://iroots.org/2012/01/13/whats-wrong-with-the-ron-paul-super-brochure/

 

[mmadness]

I'm just going to say this once, but if any of you have proof that these took votes away from Ron Paul, contact ronpaulproducts.

http://www.ronpaulproducts.com/contact.html

Funny because you posted it twice!

Think of it this way. If I was trying to meet a girl, would I go up to her and say, “You should go out with me because I’m smart, I have blue eyes, I like sex, I like to read books on economics, I like red wine, cheese, and I’m a libertarian?”

Of course not… but why not? It’s honest and tells her EVERYTHING about me, doesn't it?

So can I prove that if guys use that approach with girls, it doesn't work ALL THE TIME? No.

But I'm not going to waste my time contacting someone who believes in that approach, other than to tell them to CEASE AND DESIST when they are selling that IT WORKS or it's some MAGICAL PRODUCT, when it does the opposite.

 

[Teamronin]

I'm just going to say this once, but if any of you have proof that these took votes away from Ron Paul, contact ronpaulproducts.

http://www.ronpaulproducts.com/contact.html

A "FOR PROFIT" Company isn't going to tell you their product isn't working! That's like telling Chevron or Mobile to support your brand new electric car!! Let's get one thing stright (and me and my meet-up group has spent $100's if not 2k with RPP) RPP is a FOR PROFIT COMPANY!!! RonPaul2012.com and RevolutionPAC isn't laughing all the way to the bank when we give them money!!

 

[LibertyEagle]

Funny because you posted it twice!

Nah, that was the server, I guess. It went down at the same time I was posting.

 

[Teamronin]

Goodbye 1st place finish, hello 3rd place... again. Notice the states that we have done well in.

NH, Minnisota, Maine - NONE OF THEM HAD SB SENT
IA,SC,FL,NV - ALL STATES WHERE SB WERE SENT!

Sad to say, but these are the facts!!
RPP="For Profit" and that's MAJOR profit, not just a few bucks for the extra effort/time!!

 

[LibertyEagle]

A "FOR PROFIT" Company isn't going to tell you their product isn't working! That's like telling Chevron or Mobile to support your brand new electric car!! Let's get one thing stright (and me and my meet-up group has spent $100's if not 2k with RPP) RPP is a FOR PROFIT COMPANY!!! RonPaul2012.com and RevolutionPAC isn't laughing all the way to the bank when we give them money!!

Who said THEY were going to tell you anything? If you haven't tried showing them the PROOF that the brochure is working against us, then you don't really have a leg to stand on. And as far as RevolutionPAC is concerned, you probably should pull your other foot out of your mouth right now. Because, no one there is making money, to my knowledge, with the exception of a small fee paid to the person doing the accounting.

 

[LibertyEagle]

But I'm not going to waste my time contacting someone who believes in that approach, other than to tell them to CEASE AND DESIST when they are selling that IT WORKS or it's some MAGICAL PRODUCT, when it does the opposite.[/B]

Okey dokey. So you don't have any proof to show them. Gotcha.

 

[mmadness]

Okey dokey. So you don't have any proof to show them. Gotcha.

Way to address my point in the post and instead chop out this little bit here.

So have you any proof to show that they do work? Gotcha.

We have actual results from states where brochures were mailed and not mailed.

 

[LibertyEagle]

Look guys, I don't think these brochures are useful for mailing out, either. But, before you get all high and mighty claiming that the guys at ronpaulproducts are just in this for the money and don't give a rat's ass whether they hurt Ron Paul or not, you should at least try to gather the evidence you think you have and contact them with it. Because if you do not, and just bloviate here, on these forums, you are really just full of hot air.

Think about how you would want to be treated and act accordingly.

 

[mmadness]

Okey dokey. So you don't have any proof to show them. Gotcha.

I can play this game too.

Okey dokey. So you support companies ripping off Ron Paul supporters and hurting potential Paul supporters and having funds going to these which instead could be going to Dr. Paul's campaign, who needs funds badly.

 

[LibertyEagle]

Way to address my point in the post and instead chop out this little bit here.

So have you any proof to show that they do work? Gotcha.

We have actual results from states where brochures were mailed and not mailed.

It's not up to me to prove anything. It is you who is making all the claims. Either back them up with something more than innuendo and present them to the guys at ronpaulproducts, or you're not doing much of anything here besides gutter crawling.

 

[LibertyEagle]

I can play this game too.

Okey dokey. So you support companies ripping off Ron Paul supporters and hurting potential Paul supporters and having funds going to these which instead could be going to Dr. Paul's campaign, who needs funds badly.

Once again, lay out your proof and present it to ronpaulproducts. Do you have any proof?

By the way, they aren't "ripping off" anyone. They are buying a product and a service that they chose to buy. No one made them.

 

[mmadness]

It's not up to me to prove anything. It is you who is making all the claims.

So let's say we didn't have any proof they don't work (which we do).

Then the people who can't prove that they don't work are being "high and mighty" but you saying you don't have to prove anything is not?

Isn't that being... hypocritical?

So by your logic, I could put out a line of poisonous toys, advertise them as TOTALLY AWESOME AND MAGICAL, and then when you try to convince others that they are poisonous based on actual evidence and data, then someone can just tell you that you're being "high and mighty" and you should contact the company and not other people, because you can't prove that they aren't actually poisonous?

Either you have your head in the sand or you are in the tank for Ron Paul Products. Prove that you're not.

 

[Feeding the Abscess]

So let's say we didn't have any proof they don't work (which we do).

Then the people who can't prove that they don't work are being "high and mighty" but you saying you don't have to prove anything is not?

Isn't that being... hypocritical?

You're just being needlessly argumentative. If there's proof the brochures drove voters away, present the proof to RPP and the movement at large, it'll slow donations to the program.

 

[LibertyEagle]

So let's say we didn't have any proof they don't work (which we do).

Then the people who can't prove that they don't work are being "high and mighty" but you saying you don't have to prove anything is not?

Isn't that being... hypocritical?

Uh, that is not even logical.

You are claiming that the brochures are hurting Ron Paul's chances of becoming President. Therefore the burden is on you to prove your claim. It's really very simple.