Stern: ‘I Don’t Like Censorship,’ but Neil Young was Right to Push Blacklist Against Joe Rogan

[acptulsa]

A fair weather authoritarian. It's wild how good his show used to be, and then BAM – devolves into the same flat drivel we can already get from a thousand other places.

Kinda like The Simpsons. Does quality scare fascists?

 

[Okie RP fan]

Oh. Well he is a Nazi. He is a national socialist. I am not having a conversation. I am telling. They are collectivist views that no decent person holds. It goes for you as well.

Watch out everyone, we've got a tough guy over here!

I'm shaking in my boots!

 

[BSWPaulsen]

They are collectivist views that no decent person holds.

This statement is bizarre. Firstly, the correctness or incorrectness of collectivist views has no relation to moral judgements such as whether or not one is a decent person. Secondly, humans can be logically treated as collectives when they function as a collective. Humans are capable of recognizing the patterns that establish the fact that collective behavior is occurring. The English language has coined the term nepotism to recognize one way that it may manifest. The phrase in-group preference establishes a possible reason why with a compelling basis given the social nature of humanity. Finally, individualism and collectivism are ideological tools more than anything meant to explain the reasoning behind human action. This means that whether something is an "individualist view" or "collectivist view" is irrelevant as it concerns explaining what has occurred or is occurring.

Your consistent intellectual laziness throughout this thread is disheartening.

 

[Krugminator2]

This statement is bizarre. Firstly, the correctness or incorrectness of collectivist views has no relation to moral judgements such as whether or not one is a decent person. Secondly, humans can be logically treated as collectives when they function as a collective. Humans are capable of recognizing the patterns that establish the fact that collective behavior is occurring. The English language has coined the term nepotism to recognize one way that it may manifest. The phrase in-group preference establishes a possible reason why with a compelling basis given the social nature of humanity. Finally, individualism and collectivism are ideological tools more than anything meant to explain the reasoning behind human action. This means that whether something is an "individualist view" or "collectivist view" is irrelevant as it concerns explaining what has occurred or is occurring.

Your consistent intellectual laziness throughout this thread is disheartening.

The "Jews cause most of the problems in the world, run everything and get promoted primarily for being Jewish" isn't a reasonable take. It doesn't need to be debated. The people should be instantly banned for posting it.

 

[otherone]

The "Jews cause most of the problems in the world, run everything and get promoted primarily for being Jewish" isn't a reasonable take. It doesn't need to be debated. The people should be instantly banned for posting it.

Cancel culture right here at RPF. Use words, friend, not gags.

 

[Krugminator2]

Cancel culture right here at RPF. Use words, friend, not gags.

You make such a great point. The first topic I ever saw in 2007 or 2008 when I Googled Ron Paul was a thread on the Daily Paul about whether Peter Schiff could be trusted because he's a Jew. Those are such relevant and much needed conversations that add so much to the discourse promoting liberty. I am sure these topics will attract so many liberty lovers.

 

[Anti Federalist]

Oh. Well he is a Nazi. He is a national socialist. I am not having a conversation. I am telling. They are collectivist views that no decent person holds. It goes for you as well.

Ask yourself an honest question:

What books were the Brownshirts burning and why?

Reductio ad Hitlerum is tiresome in this age of woke Marxism.

Real history and the real reasons people act on things around them is much more nuanced.

 

[otherone]

You make such a great point. The first topic I ever saw in 2007 or 2008 when I Googled Ron Paul was a thread on the Daily Paul about whether Peter Schiff could be trusted because he's a Jew. Those are such relevant and much needed conversations that add so much to the discourse promoting liberty. I am sure these topics will attract so many liberty lovers.

There are plenty of posters here with agendas who don't promote liberty. Banning them all would create an even greater echo chamber.

 

[Sammy]

You make such a great point. The first topic I ever saw in 2007 or 2008 when I Googled Ron Paul was a thread on the Daily Paul about whether Peter Schiff could be trusted because he's a Jew. Those are such relevant and much needed conversations that add so much to the discourse promoting liberty. I am sure these topics will attract so many liberty lovers.

You Neocon Zio shill never supported Ron Paul.
You are just here because the ADL is paying you.

 

[Mach]

The Great Debate: Zionists or Jesuits (Radio Show Audio)

https://www.bitchute.com/video/vMriPkF0ySAP/