Stern: ‘I Don’t Like Censorship,’ but Neil Young was Right to Push Blacklist Against Joe Rogan

[Anti Federalist]

And everybody knows that if Trump had won in 2020 and it was him making mandates and forcing people to take jabs against their will, every single one of these cranks and cocksuckers would be screaming bloody blue murder.

The full blown politicization of medicine that happened overnight (yes I realize the foundations were laid decades ago with Medicare and Medicaid and so on) is the single most dangerous thing I have seen internally in the US in my lifetime.

 

[TheTexan]

And everybody knows that if Trump had won in 2020 and it was him making mandates and forcing people to take jabs against their will, every single one of these cranks and cocksuckers would be screaming bloody blue murder.

The full blown politicization of medicine that happened overnight (yes I realize the foundations were laid decades ago with Medicare and Medicaid and so on) is the single most dangerous thing I have seen internally in the US in my lifetime.

DJT basically triggered a hive mind status in the liberal half of America. They are no longer capable of independent thought.

 

[RJB]

And everybody knows that if Trump had won in 2020 and it was him making mandates and forcing people to take jabs against their will, every single one of these cranks and cocksuckers would be screaming bloody blue murder.

The full blown politicization of medicine that happened overnight (yes I realize the foundations were laid decades ago with Medicare and Medicaid and so on) is the single most dangerous thing I have seen internally in the US in my lifetime.

I agree that this is the most dangerous thing that I have seen as well. Another thing that I have realized in the last decade is that very few people have any principles. In 2008 both Hillary and Obama were against gay marraige. In just a few years that changed. For me it was less the policy change but rather how fickle people are in changing winds. Before the 2020 elections, I personally knew Democrats who said they would refuse the "Orange Vaccine," that now want the Biden Vaccine mandated. I also know republicans who were open to the vaccine who switched stances as well.

That had a profound impact on me because, I don't feel like I can rely on friends who I thought were solid. The wishy-washyness is what allowed this medical politicalization. My core principle nowadays, is simply, "Leave me the F--- alone! PERIOD."

The Canadian Convoy has inspired some hope. I hope that convoy sparked something that not only stays but grows.

 

[acptulsa]

I agree that this is the most dangerous thing that I have seen as well. Another thing that I have realized in the last decade is that very few people have any principles.

Blows my mind too. Trading liberty away over hypochondria and hypocrisy.

 

[Anti Federalist]

I agree that this is the most dangerous thing that I have seen as well. Another thing that I have realized in the last decade is that very few people have any principles. In 2008 both Hillary and Obama were against gay marraige. In just a few years that changed. For me it was less the policy change but rather how fickle people are in changing winds. Before the 2020 elections, I personally knew Democrats who said they would refuse the "Orange Vaccine," that now want the Biden Vaccine mandated. I also know republicans who were open to the vaccine who switched stances as well.

That had a profound impact on me because, I don't feel like I can rely on friends who I thought were solid. The wishy-washyness is what allowed this medical politicalization. My core principle nowadays, is simply, "Leave me the F--- alone! PERIOD."

The Canadian Convoy has inspired some hope. I hope that convoy sparked something that not only stays but grows.

I've given this a lot of thought...this is worse than say, Waco.

"Leave me the fuck alone" is the only proper response anymore, as these people, across the spectrum mostly, have utterly lost their cotton picking minds.

 

[Krugminator2]

And for the record, you don't know this to be true. It's entirely possible that his being Jewish, played a non-trivial factor in the decision.

Bwahahahahahahahahhahaahhahahahh0ahhahahhahwhwhwhhhwhwhhhajqhqjahwahahahahahahahb

I'm quite certain he didn't get a Nobel Prize for being Jewish.

 

[TheTexan]

Bwahahahahahahahahhahaahhahahahh0ahhahahhahwhwhwhhhwhwhhhajqhqjahwahahahahahahahb

I'm quite certain he didn't get a Nobel Prize for being Jewish.

I find it equally hilarious, that you're certain he didn't.

 

[Anti Federalist]

Blows my mind too. Trading liberty away over hypochondria and hypocrisy.

Trading...shit they are giving it away.

"Here, take it...this liberty shit is scary."

 

[Mach]

Yup. Spent their youth denouncing "the Man" only to now genuflect before him.

Genuflected for 50 million.



Darryl Hana seen something special in him alright.

 

[Mach]

Greenwald on censorship.

https://greenwald.substack.com/p/the-pressure-campaign-on-spotify

American liberals are obsessed with finding ways to silence and censor their adversaries. Every week, if not every day, they have new targets they want de-platformed, banned, silenced, and otherwise prevented from speaking or being heard (by "liberals,” I mean the term of self-description used by the dominant wing of the Democratic Party).

For years, their preferred censorship tactic was to expand and distort the concept of "hate speech” to mean "views that make us uncomfortable,” and then demand that such “hateful” views be prohibited on that basis. For that reason, it is now common to hear Democrats assert, falsely, that the First Amendment's guarantee of free speech does not protect “hate speech." Their political culture has long inculcated them to believe that they can comfortably silence whatever views they arbitrarily place into this category without being guilty of censorship.

Constitutional illiteracy to the side, the “hate speech” framework for justifying censorship is now insufficient because liberals are eager to silence a much broader range of voices than those they can credibly accuse of being hateful. That is why the newest, and now most popular, censorship framework is to claim that their targets are guilty of spreading “misinformation” or “disinformation.” These terms, by design, have no clear or concise meaning. Like the term “terrorism,” it is their elasticity that makes them so useful.

 

[ThePaleoLibertarian]

No one is more disappointing than post-2010 Howard Stern, including any edgy comedian who went woke. His show died when Artie Lange left, now it's everything he always railed against. Stern was always a germaphobe, so a pandemic might have been a sticking point when he was any age. Still, I'd still love to get the version of him from the 90s to have a conversation with whoever this wig-bedecked imposter is. This is the guy who said OJ should have been lynched the day he was acquitted, the guy who defended Bernie Goetz for killing two muggers on the NYC subway, the guy who called out Al Sharpton and Jessie Jackson as frauds when both were prominent Democrat operatives.

He served a real function; the id of the nation. The pressure release valve who gave form to the darkly hilarious side of the American psyche. Similar to Rush Limbaugh, but instead his photo negative, even down to their appearance, in addition to their politics. Now he's... Whatever this is.

Is there anyone in mainstream corporate media that today serves the function Stern did in the 90s and 2000s? If there is I can't name them.

 

[libertasbella]

A fair weather authoritarian. It's wild how good his show used to be, and then BAM – devolves into the same flat drivel we can already get from a thousand other places.

 

[osan]

It's Howard Stern, for Pete's sake, a queef from day one. I've never gotten why people ever thought he was so smart. He's a low rent announcer who rakes it in because he says endlessly stupid things on the air to shock people... which says more about the intellects who listen to, and worship him than it does about his... erm, "talent".

I remember a similar phenomenon about Billy Crystal. He wasn't funny. At all. But this is what the "left" does - it is a well-established pattern with them. They present to the world dregs of sub-humanity as messiahs and avatars of talent and virtue... usually with slatherings of that "he's so edgy" gheypoo. As if that weren't sad enough, the imbecile meaner slurps it up the way a pornho' cleans the knob.

Yes folks, we are indeed doomed.

 

[osan]

The Canadian Convoy has inspired some hope. I hope that convoy sparked something that not only stays but grows.

Don't get your hopes up. This sort of thing is usually a flash in the pan. But you never know. As I say, people have a way of surprising you at the most unexpected times.

 

[osan]

No one is more disappointing than post-2010 Howard Stern

Hate to break it to you, but pre-2010 Howard Stern was nothing to write home about either. He sucks now just as he sucked then.

 

[Okie RP fan]

What kind of Stormfront bull$#@! is that.

Besides the fact that Jews as a group are probably the most productive ethic group in society and have probably done the most disproportionate good in society, your post is the most disgusting thing I have ever read on the forums. You are an idiot and clown. That is awful. That is pure Nazi propaganda.

Conversations go nowhere whenever someone starts throwing "nazi" out. It's a tired tactic.

This conversation started because I brought up a point that I felt compelled to bring up and that point was this: through my own research, I believe there are a rather "high" number of Jews in public positions or positions of celebrity and/or influence (Hollywood, banks, the director of the CDC right now...) that are relative to their supposed population representation.

I don't bring that up lightly nor do I bring it up for no reason. I applaud and thank the responses for keeping my thoughts in line by introducing some well known libertarian Jews, etc. That's fantastic and I won't refute those points. However, in this example, we have Stern, who may not exactly be a practicing Jew anymore, but none the less has that lineage and there he is sitting on his throne where it's OK for him to say and do ANYTHING he wants AND he's allowed to try and limit what others say/do. And he doesn't receive any push back (outside the likes of our inconsequential sphere) because I believe he is "protected."
Lately with this covid stuff, I've noticed more and more conversations getting to the point where people (on the forced vaccination/mask cult side, of course) are dropping the "nazi" and "Hitler" stuff in conversations/arguments. It's completely unrelated and ironically they are the ones acting as fascists.

We all know why people do that in these conversations and it'll apply to your use as well (even though you weren't responding back directly to me). It's weak. It's pathetic. It's a tired and worn out used attempt to slander and end a conversation when the other side has nothing left. And it continues to prove my point, actually, that Jews are some protected class and we aren't allowed to speak about them, their power and influence, etc.

I have not, will not, do not approve or support what Hitler did. Do not degrade a conversation with that leftist tactic.

 

[Okie RP fan]

With all of that said, I'll refrain from bringing the subject up anymore not because of krugminator, but because I have nothing else left to say and don't want to add anymore fuel to this conversation one way or another. So, I'll end with this: Stern is a piece of crap, people should ignore him since we don't have the ability to cancel people like the left does.

 

[unknown]

This is the first time this hypocrite POS wig wearing ****** has been relevant in years.

 

[Anti Federalist]

Conversations go nowhere whenever someone starts throwing "nazi" out. It's a tired tactic.

This conversation started because I brought up a point that I felt compelled to bring up and that point was this: through my own research, I believe there are a rather "high" number of Jews in public positions or positions of celebrity and/or influence (Hollywood, banks, the director of the CDC right now...) that are relative to their supposed population representation.

I don't bring that up lightly nor do I bring it up for no reason. I applaud and thank the responses for keeping my thoughts in line by introducing some well known libertarian Jews, etc. That's fantastic and I won't refute those points. However, in this example, we have Stern, who may not exactly be a practicing Jew anymore, but none the less has that lineage and there he is sitting on his throne where it's OK for him to say and do ANYTHING he wants AND he's allowed to try and limit what others say/do. And he doesn't receive any push back (outside the likes of our inconsequential sphere) because I believe he is "protected."
Lately with this covid stuff, I've noticed more and more conversations getting to the point where people (on the forced vaccination/mask cult side, of course) are dropping the "nazi" and "Hitler" stuff in conversations/arguments. It's completely unrelated and ironically they are the ones acting as fascists.

We all know why people do that in these conversations and it'll apply to your use as well (even though you weren't responding back directly to me). It's weak. It's pathetic. It's a tired and worn out used attempt to slander and end a conversation when the other side has nothing left. And it continues to prove my point, actually, that Jews are some protected class and we aren't allowed to speak about them, their power and influence, etc.

I have not, will not, do not approve or support what Hitler did. Do not degrade a conversation with that leftist tactic.

Well stated, plus rep.

We can have all manners of conversations and discussions about the undue influence Catholics and Jesuits have on the SCOTUS, but any mention of the Chosen Ones gets shut down.

 

[Krugminator2]

Conversations go nowhere whenever someone starts throwing "nazi" out. It's a tired tactic.

Oh. Well he is a Nazi. He is a national socialist. I am not having a conversation. I am telling. They are collectivist views that no decent person holds. It goes for you as well.