State minion orders Alex Jones to sell Infowars.

For example, Sonny keeps harping on the summary judgement that was done because AJ wouldn't turn over information the judge was asking for.

Turns out, it was some old videos on his youtube channel that he didn't have access to because the families complained about his youtube channel to youtube and youtube deleted the channel.

And your source for this claim is what? A YouTube video by two obscure bloggers? Do you have a copy of the order imposing the default judgment that reflects that this was the sole basis for granting a default judgment? If so, please post it. Otherwise, you're blowing smoke.
 
Last edited:
And your source for this claim is what? A YouTube video by two obscure bloggers? Do you have a copy of the order imposing the default judgment that reflects that this was the sole basis for granting a default judgment? If so, please post it. Otherwise, you're blowing smoke.

LOL... some attorney you are..

If it had ANY basis in the default judgement, then it is not only relevant to the decision, but telling the whole thing is bullshit.

Robert Barnes was one of the advisors/attorneys for Alex Jones before the case actually went to court, the media began running smear articles against him for being involved at all. I believe it was more of an advisory role. Barnes has been a close friend of AJ forever. Barnes told AJ to GTFO out Austin a long, long time ago, he told him it would end up backfiring being in a leftwing jurisdiction.

Barnes runs this organization and does a lot of pro-bono work for people who have had their rights disregarded by the likes of you..

https://www.1776lawcenter.com/

You should listen to their weekly podcast, Viva and Barnes, you would learn a lot about how much bullshit you get fed by the media in a lot of these cases you like to come here and discuss.
 
Last edited:
At the hearing on the motion the party asking for the sanctions will have to convince the judge that the other party has, in fact, disobeyed the order. Given that the rendering of a default judgment is the most onerous sanction there is, and given that this sanction was imposed not once but twice in separate state courts, it is inconceivable (except for those who see conspiracies everywhere) that there wasn't sufficient evidence to sustain the sanctions that were imposed. But hey, maybe I'm wrong and Jones will get the default judgments reversed on appeal, assuming that he has the wherewithal to pursue an appeal of either or both cases. But I'm not holding my breath.

Yes, it's ALWAYS been expected that AJ will win on appeal.. after they sell all his shit, of course.. what recourse does he have at that point?

I was hoping you would continue to listen to more of the podcast I posted, Barnes goes into detail about why the families should be suing the shit out of their attorneys, and he has offered to do just that for them.

They could make a lot more money if they were able to get some of the profits from the company, rather than just hock the camera equipment.. but the parents want Infowars shut down.. but the whole point of the courts being involved, as I understand it, is to maximize the amount of money the families receive, not decide whether the business should be shut down - assuming that significantly reduces the amount of money they can get.. plus there is the case in the other state, what about those families? What is their recourse if the business gets sold by the parties in the other case? Do they all split it?

Apparently Media Matters is planning to offer a bid for infowars, as sort of a "trophy". However, Roger Stone and friends are putting together a plan to buy as well, and keep AJ as an employee who unfortunately makes veeeerrrryyy little money on his W-2 to garnish.
 
Last edited:
Barnes really runs pie hole fast & furious

Wonder what drug he takes?
 
Defamation isn't protected speech.

He thinks "truth is a defense against a libel suit" means the truth is "protected speech".

He also thinks this is political speech protected by the First because he believes the government paid those people.

He thinks not one but both of those apply in this case because he thinks the fact that he believes something is proof it's true.
 
He thinks "truth is a defense against a libel suit" means the truth is "protected speech".

He also thinks this is political speech protected by the First because he believes the government paid those people.

He thinks not one but both of those apply in this case because he thinks the fact that he believes something is proof it's true.

Yet Some Sandy Hook families apparently dont seem to be mind been used by the Democrats to push or demand for gun bans...
 
I thought Musk was gonna buy the goddam thing.

How do they have any money?

https://theonion.com/heres-why-i-decided-to-buy-infowars/

 
Oh wow who would have imagined that The Onion has more money than Elon Musk. I guess his companies are doing even worse than I'd heard.
 
I thought they closed down...

Did you read his reason for buying infowars?

He says Alex Jones name has already been forgotten, nobody pays attention to him anymore and his "miracle cures" nutrition supplements are all bogus and we should be buying shit from the medical industrial complex.

This has to be the dumbest person on the planet..

Alex Jones probably gets ten times more viewers than MSNBC.

By the way, MSNBC is up for sale.. Jack Posobiec says he has some investors interested in purchasing it.

Imagine MSNBC, but you can stream it online with ads, or watch it on TV like normal, but it has non-exclusive licenses to Human Events Daily with Jack Posobiec, The War Room with Steve Bannon, Infowarz with Alex Jones, Timcast IRL, Steven Crowder, maybe even the Joe Rogan Experience..
 
Oh wow who would have imagined that The Onion has more money than Elon Musk. I guess his companies are doing even worse than I'd heard.

Did you read where The Onion got the money from?

The Sandy Hook families..

Where do the proceeds go?

The Sandy Hook families..

So they basically are getting nothing from their lawsuit, except to shut down his company, which Jones is re-opening under a different name.

The attorneys of the families should be sued to oblivion, by the families themselves. They are being taken advantage of.

Also.. What happens when Jones wins on appeal? Does he get his company back? Or just the money from the sale? The Onion has to give him back the money out of their own pocket, or do they go back to the Sandy Hook families and ask them for it? The families already gave them the money to buy it, now they have to give double the money back to repay Jones? So either The Onion or the families end up losing millions of dollars..
 
Last edited:
Yolk is on us.

Nope.. read above. I'm a little tired, but I think I did the math correct.

Sandy Hook families pay, I dunno what the amount was, let's say $10 million to the Onion to buy infowars. The families get back the $10 million in proceeds, so they are square.

Then Jones wins on appeal, gets back the company, but the company no longer exists so he gets back the money they paid for it?

The Onion doesn't have the money, they got no benefit from it.. So they ask the Sandy Hook families to pay Alex Jones $10 million? Do the Sandy Hook families end up liable for $10 million to pay Alex Jones after all this?
 
Back
Top