Anti Globalist
Member
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2017
- Messages
- 48,913
Never thought about voting for Trump. Indiana is a deep red state that's only gone blue twice. I have no reason to believe that Indiana will go blue in 2024.
What I know is that the Trump presidency and all that has come with it, has had more real world results than both Ron Paul campaigns combined.
Maybe it's best just to hang it up
Bottom Line - YES we have to vote for Trump if there is no viable alternative to the Democrats.
It is called REALITY.
Not a chance.
Trump built what he did on the foundation we laid. I don't give the builder of the foundation less credit than those who built what shows, because without the foundation the rest could never have been built. Hell, hijacking our momentum was the whole point of the whole exercise, and he'd never have gotten anywhere with his brainless anti-establishment rhetoric if we hadn't been doing such a good job of spreading very intelligent anti-establishment rhetoric. And as much as I love reading the local trolls as they insist that Trump could only have been treated the way he was if he was truly anti-establishment, the fact is he was hired to make us look like a bunch of malcontents with third grade vocabularies, and could have been "fired" just to make us look ineffective.
When there's a movement they can't control, like the GOP, or usurp, like the Tea Party and the LP, they steal its thunder with an approved substitute. It's what they do.
Give us some credit.
I do give us credit. I see the 2016 election of Trump as an extension of the R3VOLUTION. At the same time, if Jeb! had been elected things would be much the same as if Hiallry had been elected. We have to give Trump and his voters credit as well.
I do give us credit. I see the 2016 election of Trump as an extension of the R3VOLUTION. At the same time, if Jeb! had been elected things would be much the same as if Hiallry had been elected. We have to give Trump and his voters credit as well.
Sadly even if Trump did run a scorched earth campaign theres no way the Democrats are letting him in under no circumstances.
Being supremely hated by the left was probably his best quality, as it kept the passage of bills to a minimum.
Everyone points to Biden and tells me Hillary would have been as bad. Maybe. But she'd have had to build the foundation for this sabotage and medical murder that Trump laid down, and I doubt she has the charisma to get that much trust--even from the left. She's also tough and not senile, so there's no guarantee she'd have been compliant as her administration made her approval ratings plunge to historic lows.
He ain't exactly loved by the right. At least, not those who are used to picking the candidates.
As supremely hated as he was, he was still somehow less hated than Hitlery
Everyone points to Biden and tells me Hillary would have been as bad. Maybe. But she'd have had to build the foundation for this sabotage and medical murder that Trump laid down, and I doubt she has the charisma to get that much trust--even from the left.
Why? What would have changed? The Wicked Witch of the West would have doubled Obama's deficit instead of going to jail? That's not a change. Seems to me Trump got away with more deficit spending and more corporate welfare than Obama or Clinton could have done, just like Reagan got away with more than Jimmy Carter could have done. I can't prove that supposition. But I'd like to see you try to prove yours.
Everyone points to Biden and tells me Hillary would have been as bad. Maybe. But she'd have had to build the foundation for this sabotage and medical murder that Trump laid down, and I doubt she has the charisma to get that much trust--even from the left. She's also tough and not senile, so there's no guarantee she'd have been compliant as her administration made her approval ratings plunge to historic lows.
You're employing conventional wisdom. Look around you. That $#@! don't apply to politics no more.
I don't follow what you are saying. Why... what? What would have changed with what? Your meaning isn't clear to me at all. I don't even get what supposition you think I am trying to make that I would prove.
I do 100% agree with you that conventional wisdom doesn't apply anymore to modern politics.
As I see it, we are in a fight of Globalists vs America First. I don't know what side you are on or even if you care. I do know that I care and I am apologetically pro-America and Anti-Globalist. Everything else is meaningless minutiae.
He's claiming Hitlery would have been just like Trump.
She would have been just like Brandon.
Here's some reality for you: This nation contains about fifty million people who could do better than Trump did. Our job is to make one of them viable.
Go hang yourself up.
I understand.
You need to believe Santa Claus is real.