So you're thinking about voting for Trump in 2024?
- Thread starter John-G
- Start date
dannno
Member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2007
- Messages
- 65,712
Uh, ya.. Trump was against mandatory vaccinations. Biden tried to implement mandatory vaccinations. The virus was released, in large part, to get Trump out of office (at least as far as timing goes.. Russia collusion didn't work.. Ukraine phone call didn't work.. so they released the virus).
acptulsa
Member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2008
- Messages
- 71,731
Oh, sure. Bill Gates has been fucking with Africa for decades in preparation for removing Trump from office. Depopulation is just a tool to get rid of politicians the Deep State doesn't like.
Hear that, guys? The fact that Gates is the child of eugenicists doesn't even enter into it. The whole world revolves around Trump.
Riddle me this, mastermind. Why did Trump finance with trillions this effort to remove him? Have we flipped back from Trump the Brilliant to Trump Who Can't Even See What You Can See?
Last edited:
nobody's_hero
Member
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2008
- Messages
- 10,891
I don't think it was as much about Trump personally as it was getting someone in office who was easier to control. We all know that if anyone other than their chosen sacred cow gets into office then they're in for a flak barrage if they get anywhere near the target.
ENTER: Joe Biden
acptulsa
Member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2008
- Messages
- 71,731
Either that, or they wanted to get people who were vowing never to take the "trumpcine" to get on board with it. Or they were just staging a distraction by stealing an election because they were also trying to steal our money and kill us off. Or they were killing multiple birds with one stone.
Or as much as Trump loves attention, he wanted out because he was a fat old man who had never worked so hard in his entire spoiled existence.
“Or as much as Trump loves attention, he wanted out because he was a fat old man who had never worked so hard in his entire spoiled existence.”
Trump loves being on a stage & drawing energy from the crowd. It’s like a drug to him & (his audience)
Obama was very good @ this as well
Too bad it’s nothing but a show
Trump loves being on a stage & drawing energy from the crowd. It’s like a drug to him & (his audience)
Obama was very good @ this as well
Too bad it’s nothing but a show
Last edited:
donnay
Member
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2007
- Messages
- 42,534
Oh C'mon man, these people are looking for the "perfect man," to run the country as THEY see fit.
Even Ron Paul didn't measure up to these standards of some protests around here. Rand, even more scrutiny, because they figured out he isn't perfect either.
acptulsa
Member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2008
- Messages
- 71,731
True. But ex-presidents get more than their share, and have more time for golf.
Isn't it?
Everyone has their line in the sand. Giving Big Pharma trillions to develop a poison, fast tracking the poison past the FDA and refusing to fire Fauci are on the wrong side of mine. Especially when it involves bombing Pfizer with dollar bills until it's buried in them, causing enough inflation to impoverish everyone I love.
If you prefer to be less discriminating than that, it's your right to be.
There's a small chance Republican primary voters could accidentally nominate a decent, or even a good, presidential candidate. But not if this clown is still sucking all the oxygen out of the room (with the MSM's help, as before).
Last edited:
CaptUSA
Member
- Joined
- May 17, 2011
- Messages
- 18,211
I'd prefer someone who has no interest in "running the country".
To me, the problem here is the power. It's not which personality is controlling the power, or if they're using the power to my liking. So I ask the question differently... Which candidate is more likely to give power back to the people? Trump had a chance and didn't do it. There's absolutely ZERO chance of anyone on the democratic side doing that.
I'm leaning towards casting my lot Dave Smith's way, right now. "Perfect man?" LOL - not even close! But he does recognize that by allowing individuals to interact freely, we all get more benefits.
acptulsa
Member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2008
- Messages
- 71,731
CaptUSA
Member
- Joined
- May 17, 2011
- Messages
- 18,211
Well.... Unless your vision to "make America great" is to dramatically reduce the power and expense of government. (ahem, and then you actually do it.)
dannno
Member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2007
- Messages
- 65,712
I said as far as timing goes. Stop trying to trick people, you sound just like the corporate fake news.
Obviously they had many goals. It was released at the perfect time for them to make Trump look bad and get mail-in voting laws in place for a fraudulent election. They made many voters think that Trump thought the virus was a hoax (as opposed to the media's reaction to the virus, which is what he was talking about). They made up a hoax about Trump telling people to drink bleach to cure covid. They told everybody that Trump didn't want covid testing done after he told a joke about how the media uses the increase in positive cases to scare people. They inflated the numbers and blamed it on Trump and red states.
acptulsa
Member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2008
- Messages
- 71,731
Says the same guy who posted this doubletalk...
Where Trump's concerned, you're more like the MSM than I am. Sure, you say different things about him than they do. But neither of you will shut up about him.
Last edited:
Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 115,405
The facts are the Communist Chinese released an engineered bio weapon, a souped up cold virus that people within our government assisted in funding and researching this "gain of function" aspect.
They released it on purpose, lied about its origins and used it as a political tool of terror and manipulation that has left millions of US citizens dead and is still killing people to this day.
Are we going to fucking do anything about that?
Or are we going to continue to Dutch Rudder each other about meaningless minutiae?
Convene Nuremberg 2.0 now.
If you have convincing evidence Trump was in collusion with Fauci and the leaders of the CCP in China during this cluster fuck, present it, then let him swing with the rest of the rat bastards.
Somebody has got to be held accountable.
They released it on purpose, lied about its origins and used it as a political tool of terror and manipulation that has left millions of US citizens dead and is still killing people to this day.
Are we going to fucking do anything about that?
Or are we going to continue to Dutch Rudder each other about meaningless minutiae?
Convene Nuremberg 2.0 now.
If you have convincing evidence Trump was in collusion with Fauci and the leaders of the CCP in China during this cluster fuck, present it, then let him swing with the rest of the rat bastards.
Somebody has got to be held accountable.
dannno
Member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2007
- Messages
- 65,712
I would rate him a 4 at best if you are comparing him to what the President and our country could be.
I would rate him a 9.5 if you are using the Big Lebowski meter. "The Dude" was a 4 at best, but he was the man for his time and place.
Ron Paul is a 9.5, but if he were actually President in our time and place, he would probably only get a 7 or an 8. Ron Paul wouldn't be elected in our time and place, so you would just have to slide him in there some how. If Ron Paul was actually elected, that would signify our country is in much better shape than it currently is, and he would be able to score higher.
Last edited:
acptulsa
Member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2008
- Messages
- 71,731
dannno
Member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2007
- Messages
- 65,712
Trump is by far our best shot at finding out who released the virus, and why. Obviously it was weaponized against him, so he has a good incentive to find that out.
