So is Bannon a racist? Yes or no?

[r3volution 3.0]

You can add Bolton on there, too.

Oh, sorry, I forgot.

Since it is axiomatic that Trump's not a hawk (despite supporting all the wars), it follows that all hawks who endorse him aren't really hawks.

For instance, Cheney is a hawk, unless he endorses Trump, in which case he ceases to be a hawk and becomes a mere "opportunist."

Doubleplusgood

 

[dannno]

Oh, sorry, I forgot.

Since it is axiomatic that Trump's not a hawk (despite supporting all the wars), it follows that all hawks who endorse him aren't really hawks.

For instance, Cheney is a hawk, unless he endorses Trump, in which case he ceases to be a hawk and becomes a mere "opportunist."

Doubleplusgood

Logic fail.

They are hawks and opportunists.

If you didn't notice the other day, they basically announced that they put Christie on his transition team because Trump knows he is a fat fuck who can't help himself.. He was trying to bring in a bunch of lobbyist insiders. It was a helpful list to have. So Trump dumped Christie, and took everybody on his list off the list of finalists for positions in his administration.

Once again, stop watching the hand with the dove in it, watch the other hand. In other words, stop listening to the mainstream media and start following Trump on twitter or something.

 

[r3volution 3.0]

Oh, yea, I guessed I missed that memo.

The other memo, the one I got, said that Christie was dumped because he'd convicted Trump's son's father-in-law of multiple felonies.

That plus Fatty was a PR problem due to Bridgegate.

...but I'm sure it's about clearing out the establishment guys, becuz MAGA and dealz.

After all, that's what hardcore libertarian, totally *not* establishment waterboy VP Mike Pence said.

Don't listen to the lamestream media, listen to FOX and Mike Pence.

 

[69360]

White nationalists are not racists. There is nothing morally or legally wrong with a white person preferring to live near or be with other white people.

White supremacists are racist. They believe the white race is superior and want to rule over other races.

SPLC is a hate group. They hate and persecute anyone who doesn't believe in government forced multiculturalism.

 

[r3volution 3.0]

White nationalists are not racists. There is nothing morally or legally wrong with a white person preferring to live near or be with other white people.

That's not what white nationalism is though.

White nationalists don't just prefer to live amongst their fellow whites, they want to use the power of the state to bring about that situation.

 

[69360]

That's not what white nationalism is though.

White nationalists don't just prefer to live amongst their fellow whites, they want to use the power of the state to bring about that situation.

No, that would be a supremacist.

I'm sure there are varying definitions and degrees of white nationalists. I'm referring to the groups that want to live in white communities and separate themselves voluntarily. Maybe they even feel white people are superior in some way. I have no problem with these people. I don't think they are doing anything wrong. I understand some even profess that the US is a country founded by people of European descent. That is factually correct.

I do have a problem with the supremacists who want to use the force of government to suppress other races.

I don't consider myself a part of the so called alt right. But I also don't have a problem with them.

 

[r3volution 3.0]

I'm referring to the groups that want to live in white communities and separate themselves voluntarily.

I appreciate that. What I'm saying is that that does not describe the vast majority of people self-ascribing as white nationalists.

You're giving them far too generous a reading.

I don't consider myself a part of the so called alt right. But I also don't have a problem with them.

They aren't what you think they are. Go to therightstuff(dot)biz sometime (the largest alt-right site) and notice the delightful banner they have, consisting of smiling NAZIs (I mean actual, 1940s, swastika-sporting NAZIs). Then read some of the articles, like the gem about how laissez faire is a Jewish conspiracy to destroy white people.

 

[tod evans]

Has the term "Yankee-ist" been coined yet?

Or "Liberal-ist" ?

Is it only acceptable to express aversion to government approved segments of society?

How 'bout a "Catholic-ist" ?

Or a Methodist-ist" ?

I don't recall ever hearing about "Oriental-ist's" either, isn't that some form of actionable discrimination?

 

[The Rebel Poet]

Oh, sorry, I forgot.

Since it is axiomatic that Trump's not a hawk (despite supporting all the wars), it follows that all hawks who endorse him aren't really hawks.

For instance, Cheney is a hawk, unless he endorses Trump, in which case he ceases to be a hawk and becomes a mere "opportunist."

Doubleplusgood

You finally figured it out! It's a well-known principle called "Quantum Politics" or colloquially "Schrodinger's Policy." Giuliani can be both a libertarian and a neocon at the same time, and it isn't until he interacts with (endorses or doesn't endorse) Trump that the wave form of his political duality collapses into one reality or the other. This is all quite well documented and there are some great youtube videos about the subject. I should also point out that this only works in the eleventh dimension of hyper-government, so if your trying to chart any of them on a Nolan chart, you have to use non-euclidean geometry.

 

[r3volution 3.0]

You finally figured it out! It's a well-known principle called "Quantum Politics" or colloquially "Schrodinger's Policy." Giuliani can be both a libertarian and a neocon at the same time, and it isn't until he interacts with (endorses or doesn't endorse) Trump that the wave form of his political duality collapses into one reality or the other. This is all quite well documented and there are some great youtube videos about the subject. I should also point out that this only works in the eleventh dimension of hyper-government, so if your trying to chart any of them on a Nolan chart, you have to use non-euclidean geometry.

 

[dannno]

Oh, yea, I guessed I missed that memo.

The other memo, the one I got, said that Christie was dumped because he'd convicted Trump's son's father-in-law of multiple felonies.

That plus Fatty was a PR problem due to Bridgegate.

...but I'm sure it's about clearing out the establishment guys, becuz MAGA and dealz.

After all, that's what hardcore libertarian, totally *not* establishment waterboy VP Mike Pence said.

Don't listen to the lamestream media, listen to FOX and Mike Pence.

If your theory is true, why bring him on in the first place?

 

[r3volution 3.0]

If your theory is true, why bring him on in the first place?

Who, Governor Biscuits?

Because he publicly fellatated Trump, and that's all it takes to become a "terrific person" in Trumpland.

You yourself still have a shot to be in the demonstration, go buy some knee pads and have at it.

 

[dannno]

Who, Governor Biscuits?

Because he publicly fellatated Trump, and that's all it takes to become a "terrific person" in Trumpland.

You yourself still have a shot to be in the demonstration, go buy some knee pads and have at it.

So he did all of those other bad things after he was brought on the team?

 

[r3volution 3.0]

So he did all of those other bad things after he was brought on the team?

Huh? What 'bad things' are you talking about?

Christie's 'bad thing' is being a warmongering, socialist, Bill-of-Rights-shredding (or eating?) whore for his entire political career.

 

[dannno]

Huh? What 'bad things' are you talking about?

Christie's 'bad thing' is being a warmongering, socialist, Bill-of-Rights-shredding (or eating?) whore for his entire political career.

You said that the reason he was kicked off the team was because he prosecuted his in-law and bridgegate was a liability. So I figure those things must have happened after he was brought on the team, correct me if I'm wrong.. I mean, you don't just give somebody a blow job to be on the team for a few days, right? Or maybe is it possible there was another reason he was brought on?

 

[The Rebel Poet]

Who, Governor Biscuits?

Because he publicly fellatated Trump, and that's all it takes to become a "terrific person" in Trumpland.

You yourself still have a shot to be in the demonstration, go buy some knee pads and have at it.

You're implying that he hasn't been doing that on these forums for a year.

 

[r3volution 3.0]

You said that the reason he was kicked off the team was because he prosecuted his in-law and bridgegate was a liability. So I figure those things must have happened after he was brought on the team, correct me if I'm wrong.. I mean, you don't just give somebody a blow job to be on the team for a few days, right? Or maybe is it possible there was another reason he was brought on?

There were recent developments in BridgeGate, a couple of Fatty's aides were convicted (or indicted? I forget...).

Thumper dumped Fatty immediately after that, for PR reasons.

The choice was made simpler, one would presume, by Trump's son's dislike for Fatty.

That's my theory.

What's your theory for why Trump associated w/ such scum as Christie, Giuliani, Pence, Bolton, and the rest of the cunt parade in the first place?

...oh, nevermind, I know, "secret strategy," 8.5D chess, alpha-game, or sumpin.

 

[specsaregood]

Huh? What 'bad things' are you talking about?

Christie's 'bad thing' is being a warmongering, socialist, Bill-of-Rights-shredding (or eating?) whore for his entire political career.

And before that, he was Bernie Madoff's lobbyist.

 

[r3volution 3.0]

And before that, he was Bernie Madoff's lobbyist.

(...slowly lowers Trump helmet upon his head, takes moment to bask in glory of said helmet...)

Bernie's in prison...

...therefore

...he's anti-establishment, otherwise he wouldn't be in prison...

...amiright?

I'm right, so...

Thus, Christie's appointment to Sec. of Doughnuts would clearly have inaugurated a golden age of dealerific, alphantastic awesomeness.

Therefore, freedom.

QED

(DISCLAIMER: The above isn't an advertisement for Trump steaks, except insofar as it's an advertisement for Trump steaks).

 

[sdsubball23]

So is alt-right a white nationalist movement? Or do some white nationalists follow the alt-right and have additional views added to the alt-right?