NorthCarolinaLiberty
Member
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2010
- Messages
- 12,674
For now, yes. I don't see them staying that way much longer.
Hopefully, it's just that the millennium and slow decline of America is young.
For now, yes. I don't see them staying that way much longer.
I agree with this, but it goes well beyond small demographics. Seems to me that a majority of people don't even recognize poor thinking patterns. I live in an area where many, many people are gun rights advocates. These same people who criticize government on the gun issue are the same people who empower government in other ways. They are--for lack of a better term--typical conservatives who advocate government be very active in certain aspects of society. They don't even recognize that strongly empowering government in these other areas adversely diminishes their rights in areas like firearms.
Ageism, racism, and sexism all in the same sentence. Doubleplusgood, comrade. Old white people need to sit down and shut-up.
This fuckin shit on RPFs? Seriously?
Nope, simply calling her out on her tiring "pull yourself up by the bootstraps" bullshit logic when she is clueless to their environment.
..He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.
"Proper English" aside - what kind of problem do you have with people standing in their own back yard while a phalanx of the enemy march down their street and fire tear-gas at what appears to be minority females? These guys in the last video before your post were wearing white T-shirts, held their hands up to demonstrate that they weren't a threat, and got fired upon IN THEIR GODDAMNED BACK YARD.
I had to delete the rest of my post, lest I violate some Forum Rules on you.
Ageism, racism, and sexism all in the same sentence. Doubleplusgood, comrade. Old white people need to sit down and shut-up.
This fuckin shit on RPFs? Seriously?
Bullshit. You're an older white woman who has no clue as to what it's like to be born into a slum environment where you're surrounded by violence, drugs, and police harassment, all of which is courtesy of a government that you cannot combat (through peace or force).
Nope, simply calling her out on her tiring "pull yourself up by the bootstraps" bullshit logic when she is clueless to their environment.
True, but a sizable majority of these people openly embrace the very same government that has perpetrated the Tuskegee Experiment and host of other social ills (abortion) upon them. It's a bizarre phenomenon to witness. They have no qualms about taking perks from said government, but then lament the negative repercussions associated with the relationship. A logical person would call for a divorce instead of continually reinforcing such misdeeds. There really can't be a middle ground. You're either a ward of the state or a free man.
Nope, simply calling her out on her tiring "pull yourself up by the bootstraps" bullshit logic when she is clueless to their environment.
Oh bullshit. How about everyone should take responsibility for their actions.
They aren't "oppressed" any more than anyone else. They need to pull their pants up and start taking responsibility for themselves, rather than ask government to subsidize them.
They like to play fast and loose with vocabulary for effect, but some will take different view. "War" is most generally described as armed conflict between two sides. If that's they way they want to define it, then there is significance in this comment:
By the time there is war, then people have had enough. Armed conflict is the very consequence of people who've had enough.
If the police are going to be so dramatic, then they could not object to any casualties. Even war has rules. If you're a casualty of those rules, they you can't go back and redefine what is just.
You can't have it both ways. If you're going to define it as war, then you must be prepared to suffer the consequences. If citizens take lethal action against the other side, then that is justified in a "war zone."
These cops are so desperate to call something a war, but have never experienced anyone fighting them back.
Also, I'd like to see proof that the looting and rioting was actually perpetrated by local citizens. Everyone is quick to judge this community based on that alone, but it doesn't seem like too many are questioning what benefit the looting and rioting actually has for the LEO's.
Not saying people won't take advantage of free stuff, and not saying people don't act like lunatics when they're angry, because I know this happens, but I'm not so quick to believe that it isn't being encouraged covertly by those in charge.
And in your mind, that excuses them looting and burning down private businesses? Really? If so, Mr. "Students for Liberty", it makes me wonder if you have confused liberty with license.
Tell me why it is that the vast majority of black Americans desire to increase the size and scope of that government who you say they cannot combat?
You literally have no idea what you are talking about, do you? The prison statistics speak for themselves. Ever here of supply side economics? How about incentive driven behavior?
Are you for real? Or just take a wrong turn on your way to Democratic Underground?
Let me make this real simple for you. People are responsible for their own actions. Period.
If someone leaves their keys in their car and someone steals it, the latter is still a thief.
I think that's what did Mike Brown in , he dared to fight back, even if it was just "mouthing off" or pushing back against a car door that was slammed into him. Or trying to get out of a choke hold. It probably sent the officer into a mag dumping rage.