Shouldn't Mittens be concerned about BLOWBACK?

[parocks]

The RPF lurkers may not have ever seen this, so for them, here it is...

Tragedy and Hope - Bill Clinton's professor at Georgetown.

 

[TheTexan]

He probably thinks blowback is just another problem shitloads of money can solve

 

[parocks]

I didn't either, though I was never impressed with the way he called the Arkansas River the 'Our-Kansas'. What does that have to do with the fact that he didn't have any more chance of beating Clinton than Rmoney has of beating Obama?

I saw an opportunity to type "wretched scumbag horrible person Mitt Romney is" and contrast him to someone who would not be considered a Liberal.

 

[CaptainAmerica]

Even Sarah Palin spoke against the strong-arm fascist tactics, and Rush was talking about it today.

Or maybe the GOP really doesn't care if he loses to Oblunder?

They have set the stage for mass control of the republican party in presidential elections from here on out. We need to take it back but the only way is to take over all the chairman positions in every state GOP.

 

[CPUd]

Operation Blowback begins in Iowa, Nevada, Virginia and Maine.

Iowa and Nevada is gonna hurt to lose in the GE. Virginia is critical. Maine is a potential tiebreaker in electoral votes.

 

[LibertyEagle]

We can get the voting machines thrown out of our states, if we want to bad enough. It just takes us each doing it.

I don't trust voting machines in primaries either, but the caucus process has a weakness too: If the real vote count is not upheld by the central tabulator, and the locals have no way of checking the official tabulated count against their own or sounding an alarm if it doesn't match, then the tabulator can cheat.

From the vote flipping thread, it appears that this happened for both caucuses and primaries: It seems that the central tabulator progressively flipped votes from Ron Paul to Romney in direct proportion to precinct size, for precincts larger than some minimum value (240 votes, I think?). The relationship between precinct size and candidate preference seems logical on its face (people in cities prefer Romney, amiright?), but in reality it's almost unheard of: It only ever happened two other times to any significant degree in previous elections, once in 2004 (again mostly favoring Romney) and in another election in Louisianna...and the guy in charge that time was convicted of election fraud. The enormous correlation shown in this election between precinct size and candidate preference is, when compared to the correlations present in historical election data, a statistical impossibility to an absurd degree. It's one of those things where winning the lottery several times in a row would be more likely.

 

[amonasro]

He probably thinks blowback is just another problem shitloads of money can solve

He's solved problems his entire life with money, and so has his family. Why should this be any different?

 

[TheTexan]

He's solved problems his entire life with money, and so has his family. Why should this be any different?

Because we can't be bought

 

[susano]

Blowback from who? The 1000 Americans who still have values AND are involved enough in politics to know what went down? Don't kid your self, the 50 million ignorant "anybody but Obama" will still vote for him. After all if they don't want a democrat they have no other choice than to vote republican. You give the masses way more credit than they deserve in assuming this will change their vote.

+ 1

My immediate thought was "blowback from whom?" The fundy fake Christian Israel first ZioNazis who can't wait to kick some Iranian ass? The corporatists and globalists? The neocons? That's whole Republican base right there. There are NO constitutionalists in the Repuke base. These are the idiots who support the PATRIOT Act and the TSA and cheered the invasion of Iraq.

 

[susano]

"What if the banks control the switch of heads just to make people happy that a head switch took place, only to make sure that they stay in power."

Is that a joke? Yeah, that's pretty much how it works. That is the central theme of the central conspiracy theory. You are curious about this, now? What did you think end the fed was for? Inflation? I guess that's part of it. But mostly it's the control. One of the Rothschilds said something like "allow me to control the nation's money supply and I care not who makes the laws". If you're serious, try the following classic in the world of conspiracy theory.

One of the most facinating authorless books is called the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. It was written at least 100 years ago by, well, no one knows, and if anyone knows, no one is telling. It's supposed to be some sort of Jewish plot, but there really isn't much religion on there. Jew could be replaced by mason or by illuminati. That's not what's interesting about the book. What is most facinating is that the book goes into great detail about the various methods used to achieve their goals. They talk about picking politicians, picking only ones with a "dark undiscovered stain" so that they can be blackmailed if they get out of line. The book, again, goes into a wide wide variety of different types of manipulations. More sports is one. Shitty art. Extremely dense with hundreds of tricks. Again, over 100 years old. And it's not dated at all. It's like "describe life in 2012". The explicitly Jewish stuff in it can be ignored, it's not tied into the "bag of tricks".

I have this open in another tab. You might like it:

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=220260&page=2

 

[Indy Vidual]

+1984

If the GOP cared about winning in November, it wouldn't have nominated a spoiled corporate raider and flip flopper. Would it?

Even Bob Dole never thought Bob Dole would win. But, you know, someone has to go through the motions.

Even George McGovern never thought George McGovern would win. But, you know, someone has to go through the motions.
John Kerry (almost) never thought John Kerry would win. But, you know, someone has to go through the motions.
Later, John McCain never really thought John McCain would win. But, you know, someone has to go through the motions.

 

[playpianoking]

Time to get my Rigged shirt today.

 

[MelissaCato]

Why can't our National Guard just go and round these organized criminals up for goodness sake ? Just around them up and get them the hell out of here !!! It is clear who defends the constitution and who doesnt.

 

[Noob]

I suspect that Obamacare well not be repealed, that the GOP well turn it into a tax debate about how high or low that taxes should be,assault weapons ban well be back and sing into law rather Romney wins or not.

 

[pacelli]

Does this guy look like he gives a shit about blowblack?

 

[Cdawg45]

Blowback from who? The 1000 Americans who still have values AND are involved enough in politics to know what went down? Don't kid your self, the 50 million ignorant "anybody but Obama" will still vote for him. After all if they don't want a democrat they have no other choice than to vote republican. You give the masses way more credit than they deserve in assuming this will change their vote.

Totally Agree. Most Americans have no idea what is going on and the majority that do, form their opinions based on what the news tells them. I got my Dad interested in Ron Paul, but now he is back to "Obama is really for the middle class, he just can't get congress to cooperate"... Makes me want to punch myself in the face..

 

[mickey mouse joy division]

The only way to make them feel it is for all 10% of us to vote for Obama. None of y'all are gonna do it, but it's the truth.

 

[A. Havnes]

What the GOP did is prove us right infront of many of their faithful. We weren't the only ones upset about the rules change concerning delegates. I'm pretty sure we picked up some active conservatives, for what they experienced their going to want to do something about it just like us.

DON'T LET TEXAS FORGET, if we could get some more inroads in texas over this it could be HUGE!

I'm not sure if comments on articles are any indication, but from what I've read, and from the people I've spoken to, it seems that a lot of people are on board with the RNC's actions. It's all because the Nevada delegates voted the way they wanted instead of the binding vote for Romney. As such, many of the Republicans I've spoken to have declared Dr. Paul's supporters to be rule-breakers who refuse to vote the way of the majority.

On the other hand, there are a number of people who said that, yes, the Nevada delegates broke the rules later, but that the RNC broke even more. The whole thing with the lost bus tends to put people off. Unfortunately, the news outlets aren't reporting all the crap that went on before the convention started.

 

[Matt Collins]

I think this may have just cost him the election.

 

[sailingaway]

We also need to think about blowback at this point. I think we made our point, but with the new media meme that all this is because we are troublemakers, and freedomworks seeming to start to buy into it I can see Romney operatives PRETENDING to be us and doing things to get Mitt sympathy and get us derission, and I think our delegates need to be on the look out for that and disassociate from it. The press conference, away from Mitt's party, seems fine, though, in form at least.