U user Member Joined Nov 6, 2007 Messages 2,067 Jan 7, 2008 #22 Wow. We have a long way to go, apparently even within our camp.
F flahavin Member Joined Oct 15, 2007 Messages 256 Jan 7, 2008 #23 Anyone that voted yes doesn't understand Ron Paul's message. Now if a state wanted to outlaw it...that's a different story.
Anyone that voted yes doesn't understand Ron Paul's message. Now if a state wanted to outlaw it...that's a different story.
E evan2024 Member Joined Jul 17, 2007 Messages 34 Jan 7, 2008 #24 Is this serious? Political polls should be outlawed? That's government overstepping its bounds, violating the Constitution, and RP would shun any idea close to this.
Is this serious? Political polls should be outlawed? That's government overstepping its bounds, violating the Constitution, and RP would shun any idea close to this.
E evan2024 Member Joined Jul 17, 2007 Messages 34 Jan 7, 2008 #25 42 votes for yes. Do you people understand RP's message?
G gjdavis60 Member Joined Oct 30, 2007 Messages 348 Jan 7, 2008 #26 No, but the inaccuracies of polling should be better explained to the public. "There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." - Benjamin Disraeli
No, but the inaccuracies of polling should be better explained to the public. "There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." - Benjamin Disraeli
brandon SINO Joined Sep 6, 2007 Messages 15,414 Jan 7, 2008 #27 So if I ask 3 people what they think about politics and put the results into a database would that make me a criminal?
So if I ask 3 people what they think about politics and put the results into a database would that make me a criminal?
CelestialRender Member Joined Nov 8, 2007 Messages 931 Jan 7, 2008 #28 I voted yes, as a joke. The second meaning to "live free, or die" is the answer to this constitutional conundrum.
I voted yes, as a joke. The second meaning to "live free, or die" is the answer to this constitutional conundrum.