Should Libertarians support anarcho-capitalism?

[Origanalist]

How so? It's absolutely true.

If somebody's gonna play cowboy and pretend they're anti-government, then, they should act like they're anti-government like a right proper cowboy instead of reaching into their pocket to fund politicians who are trying to get elected into the government that they're supposedly opposed to.

Personally, Casey was right about him and so many others here. Origanalist, and others here, are about as worthless to the cause of Individual Liberty as tits on a boar hog.

And I hope he opens his mouth in my direction because I've never told that punk what I think of him.

You edited your retarded post after you read my response like you always do. Well I opened my mouth fuckface, now what?

 

[Origanalist]

I'm not calling you anything. I'm calling a spade a spade. You talk like you're an anti-government cowboy but we know that's not true. Right? You're just a bunch of piss and hot air trying to act like something you don't have the balls to be.

You just pushed your little chest out in the other thread talking about donating to a government candidate. Yet you're anti-government. lolol.

And you're just a dumb fucker that likes to talk big on line because that's the only place he can. Piss off you idiot.

 

[Origanalist]

Youlre worthless to the cause. Do you know that? You're utterly worthless.

Whatever bitch. Keep on mumbling incoherently, lol.

 

[CCTelander]

Youlre worthless to the cause. Do you know that? You're utterly worthless.

It's good that we have you to act as the final arbiter of such things for us. All the rest of us are just too stupid and simple minded to figure out what does or does not advance the cause of liberty ourselves.

Your hubris is astounding.

 

[Natural Citizen]

And you're just a dumb $#@!er that likes to talk big on line because that's the only place he can. Piss off you idiot.

But I'm right, O. And you know it. You're a big ol pussy. lol. You talk about being anti-government, hell you even tweet about burning down federal buildings, yet you reach into your little pocket, pull out your money, and say I'm giving it to a government candidate. That's pathetic. Don't you have any gosh darned fortitude?

And as far as trying to act big, I think it's the other way around. I remember when miss annie came over here and asked you to be a mod over at lc, they didn't give give you the controls, though, did they? lolo. Of course, when they got their ceis and desist in the mail, they didn't tell all of you wanna be riff raff that they cherry picked from over here why they had to shut it down, did they? You had no idea.

But you were soooo let down. You really wanted to be somebody, didn't you, O? So much that you and some others here I should name, buit won't for the moment started your own free forum and proceeded to take to twitter to get people from here to go over there. Just because O wanted to be somebody. lol. Now that's pathetic, too.

 

[Natural Citizen]

It's good that we have you to act as the final arbiter of such things for us. All the rest of us are just too stupid and simple minded to figure out what does or does not advance the cause of liberty ourselves.

Your hubris is astounding.

At least I know what anarchy actually means., You self-defined anarchists don't seem to know what anarchy means.

I asked you to share with us your wisdom.

You chose not.

I don't think you're capable. I think it's just a word to most of you. A fad.

 

[lilymc]

I usually don't join in these debates (as I think it's a waste of time to talk about something that is never going to happen)...but I am genuinely curious to know the answer to NC's question about how things will be enforced. I still haven't seen anyone answer that. Just a lot of anger and mudslinging.

 

[Natural Citizen]

I usually don't join in these debates (as I think it's a waste of time to talk about something that is never going to happen)...but I am genuinely curious to know the answer to NC's question about how things will be enforced. I still haven't seen anyone answer that. Just a lot of anger and mudslinging.

They can't. lol.

These people are the result of fads. Not philosophies.

I wouldn't trust these misfits to lead a lunch line.

 

[Origanalist]

But I'm right, O. And you know it. You're a big ol pussy. lol. You talk about being anti-government, yet you reach into your little pocket, pull out your miney, and say I'm giving it to a government candidate. That's pathetic.

And as far as trying to act big, I think it's the other way around. I remember when miss annie came over here and asked you to be a mod over at lc, they didn't give give you the controls, though, did they? lolo. Of course, when they got their ceis and desist in the mail, they didn't tell all of you wanna be riff raff that they cherry picked from over here why they had to shut it down, did they? You had no idea.

But you were soooo let down. You really wanted to be somebody, didn't you, O? So much that you 9and some others here I should name, buit wonlt for the moment) started your own free forum proceeded to take to twitter to get people from here to go over there. Just because O wanted to be somebody. lol. Now that's pathetic, too.

Seriously? Lol, dude, seek help. You're obsessed. Ha ha ha ha.

 

[heavenlyboy34]

At least i know what anarchy actually means., You self-defined anarchist don;t seem to know what anarchy means.

I asked you to share with us your wisdom.

You chose not.

I don't think you're capable. I think it's just a word to most of you. A fad.

I think you're intellectually lazy and don't even know yourself.

Just a few of the MANY "schools" of anarchism:
[h=1]Anarcho-capitalism[/h]
[h=1]Anarcho-communism[/h]
[h=1]Anarcho-primitivism[/h]
[h=1]Anarcho-syndicalism[/h]

 

[heavenlyboy34]

I usually don't join in these debates (as I think it's a waste of time to talk about something that is never going to happen)...but I am genuinely curious to know the answer to NC's question about how things will be enforced. I still haven't seen anyone answer that. Just a lot of anger and mudslinging.

It's a good question and a matter of legal theory. Really beyond the scope of a forum post or 3, IMO. There are lengthy books by scholars about this if you're srsly interested. I'd have to search my records a bit, but I'm sure others here have some titles handy.

 

[heavenlyboy34]

They can't. lol.

These people are the result of fads. Not philosophies.

I wouldnt trust these misfits lead a lunch line.

200+ years is a "fad"... LOLOLOL

 

[Natural Citizen]

Anarchy historically means no rulers. That's what anarchy means. And every link you provide twists it into something else to insert a mechanism for a ruler. Much the same as we now have a half dozen different flavors of Baptist just because someone didn't like the tradional Baptist doctrine and proceeded to tailor their own version.

I think you're intellectually lazy and don't even know yourself.

Just a few of the MANY "schools" of anarchism:
Anarcho-capitalism


Anarcho-communism


Anarcho-primitivism


Anarcho-syndicalism

 

[Natural Citizen]

Seriously? Lol, dude, seek help. You're obsessed. Ha ha ha ha.

Yeah. Seriously. The didn't give you the controls, did they, O. But you wanted to be somebody so bad.

The fact is that you're worthless to the cause. You're a liability because you and others like you are extremist. You lack loyalty. People like you are the ones we see on the news shooting up buildings.

 

[CCTelander]

At least I know what anarchy actually means., You self-defined anarchists don't seem to know what anarchy means.

I asked you to share with us your wisdom.

You chose not.

I don't think you're capable. I think it's just a word to most of you. A fad.

Yes. At the ripe old age of 56 I've decided to just jump on board with some fad. Couldn't possibly be tht I've been involved in this liberty advocacy thing for, quite literally, my entire life and after having studied MANY different systems and ideas to achieve liberty, decided that the most logically and morally consistent one that I could find was voluntarism.

Please spare me any more of your arrogance. Perhaps, if you ever manage to acquire a tiny smattering of humility, you might actually learn something. Until then, you're beginning to bore me.

 

[CCTelander]

At least I know what anarchy actually means., You self-defined anarchists don't seem to know what anarchy means.

I asked you to share with us your wisdom.

You chose not.

I don't think you're capable. I think it's just a word to most of you. A fad.

Dupe.

 

[lilymc]

It's a good question and a matter of legal theory. Really beyond the scope of a forum post or 3, IMO. There are lengthy books by scholars about this if you're srsly interested. I'd have to search my records a bit, but I'm sure others here have some titles handy.

Thank you. But I was hoping to hear it from someone here, in their own words, in a concise, summarized way. I think it was Swordsmyth who mentioned that it's impossible to not end up having some sort of government. Maybe he's wrong, but unless I missed it, I haven't seen anyone here address that.

 

[Origanalist]

Yeah. Seriously. The didn;t give you the controls, did they, O. But you wanted to be somebody so bad.

The fact is that you're worthless to the cause. You're a liability because you and others like you are extremist. People like you are the ones we see on the news shooting up buildings.

The drugs they give you must be kicking in pretty good. Typing is hard when you have a rockin' buzz ain't it NC?

 

[Swordsmyth]

The fact that we currently have too much wife beating does not mean there is no such thing as too little.

The fact that we once had too much chattel slavery does not mean there is no such thing as too little.

I'm absolutely certain that you'd vehemently disagree with both of those statements. But when it comes to the robbery, rape and murder that is the very essence of the state, there can be too little? Please.

The fact that some people have too much body fat does not mean that there is no such thing as too little.

Some things are inherently bad, others are only bad when you have too much.

 

[Natural Citizen]

The drugs they give you must be kicking in pretty good. Typing is hard when you have a rockin' buzz ain't it NC?

Nope. I do not drink and I do not smoke and I do not take drugs.

I've seen your face, though. It's worn.