Sheriff of Jefferson County with Wachovia steals 54 yr old womens house.

donnay

Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2007
Messages
42,534
The women paid the house and owned it and owed nothing but Wachovia with the help with the sheriff broke down her front door to arrest her for trespassing on her own property.
People please email this scum tell him what you think.
This is the audio clip of Mrs. Dawn Welch as the police busted down her door to arrest her.

http://www.gcnlive.com/clips/sherrifRaidDawnWelsh051209.mp3



[email protected] Sheriffs email
 
Last edited:
I have tried to find the back story and can't find much. I hope she is okay. She can sue as long as she has the papers she got from the bank saying she owed no more and owned her home.
 
Regardless, we are guilty until proven innocent. For Americans to be terrorized like this is simply unacceptable!!
 
we need the committee of safety to form a sons of liberty group to protect people from government abuse.
 
Absolutely!

RickyJ


She owns her house--meaning, paid off the note.

So why was she arrested for trespassing?
There has to be something more to this story we are not hearing. If not then she is going to make a killing suing these clowns.
 
I found out what happened.

She had a mortgage through bank a, who sold it to bank b. Bank a sent her a letter saying she had paid it off and owed nothing. Really, bank b had not filed anything yet, so bank a had no paperwork on the new mortgage. So, bank b was bought out by Wachovia, who filed the paper work and saw that she owed too much money and decided to foreclose.

Bank b made a mistake, and bank a had sent her a letter stating she owned her home, so she thought she owned it.... and never received anything until this week when she learned they were foreclosing.
 
I found out what happened.

She had a mortgage through bank a, who sold it to bank b. Bank a sent her a letter saying she had paid it off and owed nothing. Really, bank b had not filed anything yet, so bank a had no paperwork on the new mortgage. So, bank b was bought out by Wachovia, who filed the paper work and saw that she owed too much money and decided to foreclose.

Bank b made a mistake, and bank a had sent her a letter stating she owned her home, so she thought she owned it.... and never received anything until this week when she learned they were foreclosing.

That's really confusing. If her mortgage was paid for there was no mortgage for bank A to sell to bank B involving this woman. So Wachovia buying bank B would mean nothing.

Is this truly just a clerical error, or is something else going on here?
 
Sounds like she potentially never really paid it off, but got some letter from bank a saying her mortgage had been satisfied. She thinks Great! No more mortgage, but then bank b and Wachovia start looking through their paperwork and bam. Foreclosure. I wonder if she just had no address to send her mortgage payments to because of bank b's mistake, so therefore all that time it looks like she's getting more and more behind. Then Wachovia comes in and figures she's probably received all these notices and its time to send the sheriff.

If that's how it all went down, that's just ugly.
 
As far as what everyone who knows her and has seen the paper says, she didn't own her house yet, she had 2 more payments...but, that letter said she owned it....so she technically fell back on her mortgage and they foreclosed...

I think it should be okay.
 
Sounds like she potentially never really paid it off, but got some letter from bank a saying her mortgage had been satisfied. She thinks Great! No more mortgage, but then bank b and Wachovia start looking through their paperwork and bam. Foreclosure. I wonder if she just had no address to send her mortgage payments to because of bank b's mistake, so therefore all that time it looks like she's getting more and more behind. Then Wachovia comes in and figures she's probably received all these notices and its time to send the sheriff.

If that's how it all went down, that's just ugly.

That's exactly right...and she went back to bank a..... and they said, "oh, oops"...but by that time, they had already foreclosed. That is why she didn't leave. It was HER house. The bank told her so. You know?
 
As far as what everyone who knows her and has seen the paper says, she didn't own her house yet, she had 2 more payments...but, that letter said she owned it....so she technically fell back on her mortgage and they foreclosed...

I think it should be okay.

Two payments? This is all about two payments? Wachovia should have told her this. I'm sure people would have donated the money to make the last two payments.

What is it that you think will be OK? Sounds to me like she got royally screwed here.
 
I think that she will get her house back and I think she can sue everyone involved.

I didn't say it would make anything better or validate anything, but it will ...just okay.
 
I think that she will get her house back and I think she can sue everyone involved.

I didn't say it would make anything better or validate anything, but it will ...just okay.

If she owed two payments and the bank has records they sent her bills then she might not get her house back. Yes, she can sue bank A for the clerical mistake, but she still may lose her house. I would think this woman would know how many payments she had left. Surely she must have thought it strange the bank was willing to write those two payments off without saying they were doing so. I would have gone to the bank with the letter immediately and made sure it was correct. It seems to me that this was a scam to steal people's homes that are about to be paid for and that it was no mistake at all.
 
With 2 payments left, no court in the US would side with the bank after a debt transfer, I've never seen it happen. They would just tell her to make the last 2 payments. This is a common scam when debt is transferred. I could even bet the woman was elderly.
 
Back
Top