Sheriff Joe Arpaio: I Spoke with Andrew Breitbart Shortly Before he Died

FtA said:
We also don't give much of a rip about Obama's birth certificate. It's a zit on the ass of a terminal cancer patient.

Are you ok with Barry being on the ballot again?
Winning again?
 
Irrelevant.


Don't matter that a commie felon has illegally held the nation's highest office for 3+ years - and it don't really matter if he's allowed to run again, win, and hold the office for 4 more years.

We're sinkin' anyway you slice it.

Don't need no damn message.


Anyhoo, Arpaio is an a-hole thug, and that's the main point here.



Pass me the bong, Cheech!
Sounds about right !!
 
VERY scary, indeed.

Complete societal meltdown.
Utter chaos - the likes of which we've probably never seen.

An Obama dream scenario.


err...






The fervent anti-cop sentiment on the board is interesting, and even cute - in a certain way.

The response to the Arpaio findings by some in here (bash HIM, and turn a blind eye to Barry's illegal shenanigans) are in line with the overwhelming media response to the Arpaio findings.

Good company.
Given time they will get Obama his second term, and bring anarchy to the land.
 
What's "cute" is the impression that Joe Arpaio is going to lead the charge and "save America" by exposing Obama, when he already clearly gets away plenty of other illegal bullshit.
What's cute is that someone in a position of authority has finally taken a stand, and people are discussing the very real possibility that this nation is not what it seems to be.

Isn't that what the Liberty movement is about ?
People waking up, getting involved, and helping to effect positive change that supports individual freedoms.
 
Prejudices run deep

Truth is truth.
I was hopeful of the guy when I first heard of him years ago. He is more into Attention Whoring and Power Tripping.

I really don't know if folks there like it or just can't get rid of him.
Either way,, it is a jurisdiction I do not want to find myself in.
 
Isn't that what the Liberty movement is about ?
People waking up, getting involved, and helping to effect positive change that supports individual freedoms.

Yeah, cause "Sherriff Joe" is a libertarian, concerning himself with pushing the philosophy of liberty forward. :rolleyes:
 
Your post is now readable.



The complete societal meltdown has been brought about by an acceptance of violence and theft. It's no wonder that the better among us are opposed to cops.

We also don't give much of a rip about Obama's birth certificate. It's a zit on the ass of a terminal cancer patient.
Translation, you've given up ?
 
Truth is truth.
I was hopeful of the guy when I first heard of him years ago. He is more into Attention Whoring and Power Tripping.

I really don't know if folks there like it or just can't get rid of him.
Either way,, it is a jurisdiction I do not want to find myself in.

Sucks for Barry that he's found his way into Joe's... jurisdiction. haha




azxd said:
What's cute is that someone in a position of authority has finally taken a stand, and people are discussing the very real possibility that this nation is not what it seems to be.

Very well put.
 
What's cute is that someone in a position of authority has finally taken a stand, and people are discussing the very real possibility that this nation is not what it seems to be.

Isn't that what the Liberty movement is about ?
People waking up, getting involved, and helping to effect positive change that supports individual freedoms.

Except Arpaio doesn't really care about individual freedoms.

Newt Gingrich talks about the Fed, but does anyone really believe that he's "taken a stand"? Only the lemmings.
 
What's "cute" is the impression that Joe Arpaio is going to lead the charge and "save America" by exposing Obama, when he already clearly gets away plenty of other illegal bullshit.

What's cute is that someone in a position of authority has finally taken a stand, and people are discussing the very real possibility that this nation is not what it seems to be.

Isn't that what the Liberty movement is about ?
People waking up, getting involved, and helping to effect positive change that supports individual freedoms.

Isn't that what the Liberty movement is about ?
People waking up, getting involved, and helping to effect positive change that supports individual freedoms.
Yeah, cause "Sherriff Joe" is a libertarian, concerning himself with pushing the philosophy of liberty forward. :rolleyes:
Is this an intentional ommission, or a reading comprehension issue that allows for dismissal of context ?
 
Frankly, I never knew much at all about Joe Arpaio before this Obama investigation.

He may be grade-A @sshole, but I don't care.

To date, he's the only person in a position of authority to show a pair of 'nads and not slink away from confronting this massive issue.

I salute that.
 
Except Arpaio doesn't really care about individual freedoms.

Newt Gingrich talks about the Fed, but does anyone really believe that he's "taken a stand"? Only the lemmings.
I didn't know that you knew this sheriff so well ... I bow to your insider knowledge LOL
 
Frankly, I never knew much at all about Joe Arpaio before this Obama investigation.

He may be grade-A @sshole, but I don't care.

To date, he's the only person in a position of authority to show a pair of 'nads and not slink away from confronting this massive issue.

I salute that.

Donald Trump was squealing about this last year and is still doing so, I'm surprised you aren't clamoring for him to enter the race as a third party candidate. He's endorsed Mitt Romney, for what it's worth.
 
Link me up to Ron Paul saying he would replace cops with private security.

tia

Ron Paul said:
The government is incapable of doing what it's supposed to do. A job like the provision of security is something best left to private institutions.

Ron Paul said:
If we reflect on how security works in the real world, we discover a huge and important role for private enterprise, and we find that the vast government apparatus of "national security" does not keep us safe so much as threaten our liberties by regarding the entire citizenry as a threat. Private security does not threaten our civil liberties, but government-provided security does.

Paul doesn't even want government funded secret service.

If you understand Ron's position you'll understand why he'd prefer free markets in security services.
 
Back
Top