Sen. Paul taking heat for Ebola stance (Links)

jllundqu

Member
Joined
May 24, 2011
Messages
7,304
http://jaybookman.blog.ajc.com/2014/10/02/on-ebola-rand-paul-shows-us-what-a-leader-doesnt-do/

On Ebola, Rand Paul shows us what a leader DOESN’T do

http://thehill.com/business-a-lobbying/219556-rand-paul-accuses-obama-of-underplaying-ebola-risk

Rand Paul accuses Obama of 'underplaying' threat from Ebola

http://www.politico.com/story/2014/10/rand-paul-ebola-111547.html?hp=l4

Rand Paul stokes Ebola fears


The comments are NOT in Rand's favor. He's being accused of politicizing the ebola crisis for personal gain. I agree with Rand largely on this issue, but wanted to post the links anyway.


As requested:

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) accused the Obama administration of “underplaying” the threat of Ebola after it was identified in the U.S.

In an interview with the Laura Ingraham Show on Wednesday, Paul said the administration was failing to adequately warn the public about the disease because health officials insisted on maintaining “political correctness.”

“I am concerned about it, and it’s a big mistake to downplay it and act as if it’s not a big deal. ... This could get beyond our control,” Paul said.

Paul said because the issue of Ebola is being “dominated by political correctness, we’re not really making sound, rational, scientific decisions.”

A Liberian man was diagnosed with Ebola in a Dallas hospital on Tuesday, marking the first case of the virus outside of Africa. The man was potentially in contact with as many as 80 people between his arrival in Texas and his diagnosis, health officials said.

Paul said the U.S. should pursue a more aggressive approach to protecting its borders.

He questioned Obama’s decision to send 3,000 soldiers to West Africa to help contain the disease, warning that they could become infected. He also took issue with the U.S. playing host to dozens of African leaders for a conference last month, suggesting it could have transmitted the disease.

"Wouldn’t it make sense to delay it for four months and not have them all come to New York City?" Paul said.

Paul, though, on Wednesday questioned Frieden’s statements and said health officials might be underestimating the disease’s potential impact in the U.S. and worldwide.

“I think because of political correctness we’re not really making sound, rational, scientific decisions on this,” the senator said. “It’s a big mistake to underestimate the potential for problems worldwide.”

Paul, a potential 2016 presidential candidate, also expressed concern about President Barack Obama’s plan — announced earlier this month — to send up to 3,000 troops to combat Ebola in West Africa, the major hub of the disease.

“You also have to be concerned about 3,000 soldiers getting back on a ship,” he said, expressing concern about the spread of disease in close quarters. “Can you imagine if a whole ship full of our soldiers catch Ebola?” he asked later.

The senator also referenced reports that the U.S. patient had contact with another individual who had Ebola, and helped her into a taxi in Liberia after the woman couldn’t get an ambulance. “There are people getting it who simply helped people get in or out of a taxicab,” Paul said.

Health experts have largely expressed caution about a potential outbreak in the U.S., saying that the country has superior treatment, sanitation, communication and medical practices than certain countries in West Africa.

CDC has not minimized the risk of the outbreak’s potential in West Africa, with a projection last month that included a worst-case scenario of 1.4 million cases by late January if the international mobilization in that region did not increase significantly and remain sustained for months.

And CDC Director Tom Frieden, as well as other top health officials, have testified that the longer and bigger the outbreak became, the greater the chance of the virus crossing borders and being spread to other countries and continents.

The CDC did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Health officials did not address Paul’s remarks at a briefing Thursday afternoon.
 
Last edited:
The comments are NOT in Rand's favor. He's being accused of politicizing the ebola crisis for personal gain. I agree with Rand largely on this issue, but wanted to post the links anyway.

People are stupid. Reading the comment section on any of these articles will make you go completely insane.
 
How about for the sake of keeping this honest somebody post links to what Rand has actually SAID on the topic. I'd rather debate the merits of what he actually said and not dwell on what a bunch of washed out propaganda outlets say.
 
I'd be interested in what Rand said too. I'm getting the same kinds of accusations thrown at me from some quarters, even though I am approaching it simply as a rational exploration of what could happen if we don't change policies, and adamantly insisting that ebola is NOT a threat now, but if the CDC keeps doing what it's doing it may BECOME a threat in the future. Apparently accusing the CDC is rank incompetence is an anti-libertarian position now. :rolleyes:
 
http://dailycaller.com/2014/10/01/r...itical-correctness-influence-ebola-decisions/

Rand Paul: Obama Foolishly Letting ‘Political Correctness’ Influence Ebola Decisions
Yep. Pretty much exactly where I am at - not claiming ebola is an immediate threat, but that the policies of this administration are working to make it a threat.

OK, so now where are all of our amateur virologists stepping up to claim that Doctor Rand Paul is ignorant and doesn't have a clue what he is talking about?
 
The comments are NOT in Rand's favor. He's being accused of politicizing the ebola crisis for personal gain. I agree with Rand largely on this issue, but wanted to post the links anyway.

You're kidding right? This is not only super smart politics by Rand, but also the sort of finger waving and/or 'fear mongering' that's legitimately in the best interest of the American people rather than the MIC, BigPharma and/or BigGov).

Also, here's another guy who "played politics" with an outbreaking disease (albeit one which is/was significantly less dangerous than Ebola):

 
Of course this is about political correctness. The leftist cultural Marxists wouldn't be screaming bloody murder right now if it wasn't true.

“You know you're over the target when you start taking flak.”
 
I'm amazed at the overall complacency on the part of the government and elected officials. I can't tell if they're really that dumb, or if they simply can't handle the truth... but they're only about one step away from sticking their fingers in their ears and chanting "nah-nah-nah-nah" at the top of their lungs.

The Ebola virus is NOT something we want to f*ck with. And it's here.

It can be tamped down if sensible actions are taken right now. But if everyone dawdles and fiddles around until there are multiple cases in multiple large urban areas, each with HUNDREDS of their own transmission vectors, we're gonna be in a world of hurt.

I can't give enough recommendations to this book:


http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/hot-zone-richard-preston/1101092197?ean=9780385479561

9780385479561_p0_v2_s260x420.JPG
 
Everything that I am hearing from the people who actually know the most about the Ebola virus, points to the conclusion that this is not anything to be worried about. At all. This whole thing is a media shitstorm, nothing more. Someone remind me to bump the ebola topics in a year
 
Everything that I am hearing from the people who actually know the most about the Ebola virus, points to the conclusion that this is not anything to be worried about. At all. This whole thing is a media shitstorm, nothing more. Someone remind me to bump the ebola topics in a year

Yeah, the public gets used to just about anything. Fukushima can spew radiation for the next thousand years but it's old news.

We all hope that Ebola doesn't spread. I'm at 50/50 on this spreading in the US right now. Can it be contained? Once again, hopefully. We can all celebrate if this is old, forgotten news in a year.
 
It sure as hell can be stopped. CDC seems intent on turning a total non-threat into an actual threat via incompetence. It is utterly a non-threat NOW, but if the CDC keeps on the way it has been, it will become a legitimate threat in the future. Calling attention to CDC incompetence is simply one means of trying to make them straighten up and fly right.
 
Back
Top