Scott Adams and Rasmussen's "It's okay to be white" poll

Bay Area cartoonist who created Dilbert goes on racist rant, draws condemnation..
https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/dilbert-17805004.php

So Adams is the racist for pointing out the fact that roughly half of blacks think it is NOT OK to be white or are uncertain.

Not unsurprising.

His strip will be canceled across the country by the end of this week.

Hopefully he is smart enough to take his lumps and not crimp and fold like a Chinese laundry with a bunch of cheesy and insincere "apologies" and regrets.
 
Last edited:
So Adams is the racist for pointing out the fact that roughly half of blacks think it is NOT OK to be white or are uncertain.

Not unsurprising.

His strip will be canceled across the country by the end of this week.

Hopefully he is smart enough to take his lumps and not crimp and fold like a Chinese laundry with a bunch of cheesy and insincere "apologies" and regrets.

He was planning on blowing up Dilbert before he retires. He is 65 and already very wealthy.
 
That's one theory, but it doesn't explain why Africa as an entire continent is a $#@!hole.

I've become more of the belief that it's simply a genetic predisposition to aggression & violence. This isn't a politically correct position to have, but it's what the facts have been telling us for many generations now.

Most of the world in the tropics didn't advance far - humans don't seem to deal with heat as well as colder climates.
 
So Adams is the racist for pointing out the fact that roughly half of blacks think it is NOT OK to be white or are uncertain.

Not unsurprising.

His strip will be canceled across the country by the end of this week.

Hopefully he is smart enough to take his lumps and not crimp and fold like a Chinese laundry with a bunch of cheesy and insincere "apologies" and regrets.

And here it comes, first thing Monday morning.



Media drop Dilbert after creator’s Black ‘hate group’ remark

https://apnews.com/article/animation-and-comics-business-e2266a2356d4159b7f43fdc095be9fcb

By DAVID A. LIEB 26 Feb 2023

The creator of the Dilbert comic strip faced a backlash of cancellations Saturday while defending remarks describing people who are Black as members of “a hate group” from which white people should “get away.”

Various media publishers across the U.S. denounced the comments by Dilbert creator Scott Adams as racist, hateful and discriminatory while saying they would no longer provide a platform for his work.

Andrews McMeel Syndication, which distributes Dilbert, did not immediately respond Saturday to requests for comment. But Adams defended himself on social media against those whom he said “hate me and are canceling me.”

Dilbert is a long-running comic that pokes fun at office-place culture.

The backlash began following an episode this past week of the YouTube show, “Real Coffee with Scott Adams.”

Among other topics, Adams referenced a Rasmussen Reports survey that had asked whether people agreed with the statement “It’s OK to be white.”

Most agreed, but Adams noted that 26% of Black respondents disagreed and others weren’t sure.

The Anti-Defamation League says the phrase was popularized in 2017 as a trolling campaign by members of the discussion forum 4chan but then began being used by some white supremacists.

Adams, who is white, repeatedly referred to people who are Black as members of a “hate group” or a “racist hate group” and said he would no longer “help Black Americans.”

“Based on the current way things are going, the best advice I would give to white people is to get the hell away from Black people,” Adams said on his Wednesday show.

In another episode of his online show Saturday, Adams said he had been making a point that “everyone should be treated as an individual” without discrimination.

“But you should also avoid any group that doesn’t respect you, even if there are people within the group who are fine,” Adams said.

The Los Angeles Times cited Adams’ “racist comments” while announcing Saturday that Dilbert will be discontinued Monday in most editions and that its final run in the Sunday comics — which are printed in advance — will be March 12.

The San Antonio Express-News, which is part of Hearst Newspapers, said Saturday that it will drop the Dilbert comic strip, effective Monday, “because of hateful and discriminatory public comments by its creator.”

The USA Today Network tweeted Friday that it also will stop publishing Dilbert “due to recent discriminatory comments by its creator.”

The Plain Dealer in Cleveland and other publications that are part of Advance Local media also announced that they are dropping Dilbert.

“This is a decision based on the principles of this news organization and the community we serve,” wrote Chris Quinn, editor of The Plain Dealer. ”We are not a home for those who espouse racism. We certainly do not want to provide them with financial support.”

Christopher Kelly, vice president of content for NJ Advance Media, wrote that the news organization believes in “the free and fair exchange of ideas.”

“But when those ideas cross into hate speech, a line must be drawn,” Kelly wrote.
 
Christopher Kelly, vice president of content for NJ Advance Media, wrote that the news organization believes in “the free and fair exchange of ideas.”

“But when those ideas cross into hate speech, a line must be drawn,” Kelly wrote.

the free and fair exchange of ideas: "it's not okay to be white"

hate speech: "everyone should be treated as an individual ... you should also avoid any group that doesn’t respect you, even if there are people within the group who are fine"

Get it?

Got it?

Good.
 
Misinterprets data to come to a racially divisive (but intriguing and clickable!) conclusion.

Sounds like he's trying out for new boss same as the old boss as television dies.
 
Personally, I'd rather exclude myself from the "intellectual elite" in every race! Real people don't care about their games.

LOL so true. The elite are a group of people interested in hall monitoring and laughing together about their subjects. Meanwhile everyone else just has somewhere to go.
 
the free and fair exchange of ideas: "it's not okay to be white"

hate speech: "everyone should be treated as an individual ... you should also avoid any group that doesn’t respect you, even if there are people within the group who are fine"

Get it?

Got it?

Good.

Yes, comrade.
 
To be blunt, I think that Adams is just reaping what he has sown. While I "get it" that the media/etc. have created this condition of "reverse racism", it's just ridiculous to say "Blacks are a hate-group". It's nonsensical. The term "hate-group" is nonsensical from its birth; trying to seize that term and re-purpose it based on a racial poll is not intelligent, it's double-nonsense. Adams's actions here represent everything about the wrong way to go about opposing leftism. The net result is that he has impoverished himself, and given the Left an even bigger bullhorn to shout their "hate-group" nonsense from. This illustrates that you can be "technically right" but practically wrong... a situation that libertarians perennially find themselves in. How strange that we can never seem to move past the most basic mistakes in movement-building. It's almost like there are turncoats among us whose assigned duty is to say foolishly racist things in order to make the movement look bad...
 
To be blunt, I think that Adams is just reaping what he has sown. While I "get it" that the media/etc. have created this condition of "reverse racism", it's just ridiculous to say "Blacks are a hate-group". It's nonsensical. The term "hate-group" is nonsensical from its birth; trying to seize that term and re-purpose it based on a racial poll is not intelligent, it's double-nonsense. Adams's actions here represent everything about the wrong way to go about opposing leftism. The net result is that he has impoverished himself, and given the Left an even bigger bullhorn to shout their "hate-group" nonsense from. This illustrates that you can be "technically right" but practically wrong... a situation that libertarians perennially find themselves in. How strange that we can never seem to move past the most basic mistakes in movement-building. It's almost like there are turncoats among us whose assigned duty is to say foolishly racist things in order to make the movement look bad...

The Left created this divide. As much as we can wish that this divide doesn't exist, it does. When a group of people have spent their entire lives being psychologically programmed to want to murder you, it's a little too late to start holding their hands and singing kumbaya.

Keeping your distance from people who want to see you dead, is good advice if you wish for a peaceful life.
 
Last edited:
To be blunt, I think that Adams is just reaping what he has sown. While I "get it" that the media/etc. have created this condition of "reverse racism", it's just ridiculous to say "Blacks are a hate-group". It's nonsensical. The term "hate-group" is nonsensical from its birth; trying to seize that term and re-purpose it based on a racial poll is not intelligent, it's double-nonsense. Adams's actions here represent everything about the wrong way to go about opposing leftism. The net result is that he has impoverished himself, and given the Left an even bigger bullhorn to shout their "hate-group" nonsense from. This illustrates that you can be "technically right" but practically wrong... a situation that libertarians perennially find themselves in. How strange that we can never seem to move past the most basic mistakes in movement-building. It's almost like there are turncoats among us whose assigned duty is to say foolishly racist things in order to make the movement look bad...

To the Media hating the White Europeans whatever they are Russian or not it is acceptable.
 
The Left created this divide. As much as we can wish that this divide doesn't exist, it does.

So what? Idiots have idiotic opinions. Reflecting their idiocy back to them doesn't make you brilliant, it just makes you an idiot, too.

When a group of people have spent their entire lives being psychologically programmed to want to murder you, it's a little too late to start holding their hands and singing kumbaya.

Investing energy to battle fools dignifies folly. Remember when the US would not talk to the Kims? It may have been a strategically stupid policy in the case of NK, but what was the stated reason? Negotiating with terrorists and rogue states only dignifies them. And that's a perfectly true strategic principle. Libertarians would do well to actually implement it, instead of running headlong, Charlie Brown-style, to kick every football the Marxist Lucies hold for the kick. You guys run headlong into the trap every single time, it's painful to watch.

Keeping your distance from people who want to see you dead, is good advice if you wish for a peaceful life.

Yes, it's so obvious as to be irrelevant. Blacks are not a "hate-group". That claim by Adams is so absurd it's not even wrong. This issue is not the hill to die on. Everyone who follows this pied-piper is just being led down to the slaughter. Think twice whose tune you're really dancing to!
 
So what? Idiots have idiotic opinions. Reflecting their idiocy back to them doesn't make you brilliant, it just makes you an idiot, too.



Investing energy to battle fools dignifies folly. Remember when the US would not talk to the Kims? It may have been a strategically stupid policy in the case of NK, but what was the stated reason? Negotiating with terrorists and rogue states only dignifies them. And that's a perfectly true strategic principle. Libertarians would do well to actually implement it, instead of running headlong, Charlie Brown-style, to kick every football the Marxist Lucies hold for the kick. You guys run headlong into the trap every single time, it's painful to watch.



Yes, it's so obvious as to be irrelevant. Blacks are not a "hate-group". That claim by Adams is so absurd it's not even wrong. This issue is not the hill to die on. Everyone who follows this pied-piper is just being led down to the slaughter. Think twice whose tune you're really dancing to!

Preach kumbaya all you like, when the race war starts, none of what you're saying will be relevant.
 
To be blunt, I think that Adams is just reaping what he has sown. While I "get it" that the media/etc. have created this condition of "reverse racism", it's just ridiculous to say "Blacks are a hate-group". It's nonsensical. The term "hate-group" is nonsensical from its birth; trying to seize that term and re-purpose it based on a racial poll is not intelligent, it's double-nonsense. Adams's actions here represent everything about the wrong way to go about opposing leftism. The net result is that he has impoverished himself, and given the Left an even bigger bullhorn to shout their "hate-group" nonsense from. This illustrates that you can be "technically right" but practically wrong... a situation that libertarians perennially find themselves in. How strange that we can never seem to move past the most basic mistakes in movement-building. It's almost like there are turncoats among us whose assigned duty is to say foolishly racist things in order to make the movement look bad...

Scott Adams is a trained hypnotist. He knew exactly what he was doing and exactly what the consequences would be when he did it. Thinking you know what he is doing here is like trying to guess how a magician performed their magic trick. He has more than enough F you money and he has a new book in pre-release... he gives it about 50/50 that the book will get cancelled.

The whole point of what he said is calling out the racial divisiveness. Anybody who thinks he is trying to add to it has no idea what they are talking about. Anybody who listens to him for an hour every single day knows he is the exact opposite. A few weeks ago he was talking about how great diversity is - everything else equal. If you have two groups who are equal in every other way, the group that has more diversity is on average going to do better on their project or task, according to him. His nextdoor neighbor is black, they are great friends. His community and his friends are all extremely racially diverse, although it is a lot of silicon valley tycoon types.

The point is, watch and learn, he is going to turn this all into something very good for everyone.

Additionally, he now has complete control over all licensing of everything Dilbert. The comic will live on, but probably just on the internet. It will be much spicier than it was.
 
Last edited:
Scott Adams is a trained hypnotist. He knew exactly what he was doing and exactly what the consequences would be when he did it. Thinking you know what he is doing here is like trying to guess how a magician performed their magic trick. He has more than enough F you money and he has a new book in pre-release... he gives it about 50/50 that the book will get cancelled.

The whole point of what he said is calling out the racial divisiveness. Anybody who thinks he is trying to add to it has no idea what they are talking about. Anybody who listens to him for an hour every single day knows he is the exact opposite. A few weeks ago he was talking about how great diversity is - everything else equal. If you have two groups who are equal in every other way, the group that has more diversity is on average going to do better on their project or task, according to him. His nextdoor neighbor is black, they are great friends. His community and his friends are all extremely racially diverse, although it is a lot of silicon valley tycoon types.

The point is, watch and learn, he is going to turn this all into something very good for everyone.

Additionally, he now has complete control over all licensing of everything Dilbert. The comic will live on, but probably just on the internet. It will be much spicier than it was.

I understand all of that, but there's still such a thing as being too clever. I didn't say that I think Adams is racist, and I've seen no evidence that he is. It's clear that he opposes Wokism and, given that he has a large media platform, he has two options: keep his yap shut about the subject, or get canceled. "Get Woke or go broke" is not an idle threat, that's obvious at this point. All of that said, when your enemy bends over and moons you and waves a big red flag at you, and you go charging into that flag like a dumbass raging bull... don't be shocked when you get stabbed through the heart. Adams may be quite clever at what he does, but the Left has cadres of clever hypnotists just like him.

As for racial division, I didn't say that Adams is "adding to" it... that's not the point, he's playing into The Narrative for nothing in return. There is no strategic ground that was gained, here. The money that was going into his bank account will now be going into the bank account of some other Woke, or at least Woke-compliant, cartoonist. He didn't expose the hypocrisy of the Wokists to those who need to see it exposed (the rank-and-file, useful-idiot Wokists), he just gave them a bigger bullhorn to shout into. I'll leave the door ajar to the 1% possibility that there is some kind of magic ju-jutsu flip that Adams has up his sleeve, but I strongly doubt it. This same maneuver has played out thousands of times before, and it's the same script every time. The Left pushes anti-white/asian/etc. racism, the braindead-right jumps at the provocation and says, "if you can be racist, then we can be racist!", then the Left flips on the MSM news cameras mid-stream and gets yet more camera-reel of clueless right-tards spouting Tuckerese talking-points that, "If it's fair for them to be racist, then it's fair for us to be racist, but we're not racist, because we oppose them being racist!" which just plays to the masses as blatantly obvious proof that the right is racist. Touchdown Marxist Left!!

Adams flubbed the ball, change my mind!
 
Back
Top