SC Debate - FNC (1/16/12) 9pm ET - Official Thread

But at some point you just have to be dumb to not see the truth despite the distractions.

Not really. Life is good for the time being. They are somewhat insulated from the truth.
 
If they nominate anyone else, they're only ensuring another Obama win. Paul's will stay home, or write in Paul. We will vote with our conscience, not Party!

I will do the unthinkable at the ballot box this year, barring a Ron Paul nomination. Just don't make me say it...I really believe America would deserve it.
 
And on that realm of Sean's hairgel, Luntz needs to find a new bowl to use, his hair is looking like a bowlhead.
 
So the Gingrich won...

Have to say he managed to hit back on the racial question and even get explosive positive response. Guy`s a good debater.

That being said I`d say Paul finished second after Gingrich in terms of debate performance. Romney came 3d, Santorum/Perry on 4th both performing about the same.
 
Best thing that can happen from this debate is Romney loses SC and this race goes on. We move on to friendlier waters past SC and FL like the caucus states.
 
Listening to the jeers when Dr. Paul was laying out our lack of respect for other countries' sovereignty and the rule of law made my heart sink :(

No one wants to hear about Pakistan's sovereignty when the issue involves grabbing the terrorist who carried out 9-11 (I don't believe that bull personally but I'm not a typical GOP tool)
 
Actually think Paul did pretty good. Yes, it hurts that he didn't get to answer his follow-up to Mitt's fake anti-bailout rant, but he created a lot of contrast tonight with his foreign policy. Very important in a pool of five candidates to show that you're distinct and very important for sewing ideas of a peaceful foreign policy into a nationally watched audience.
 
FU Frank on deck to pump up Gingrich. Any doubt that this debate was meant to help Gingrich maintain his slight lead over Paul?

more than that; obvious Rupert has given marching orders to support Newt

they want a Newt win
 
Wow. Ron barely said what he did for the 2nd Amendment. People understand 2nd Amendment, they don't understand tort law :(
Yup. People are simpletons. That went over the head of most people and the take away is that Ron is weak on the 2nd Amendment, which is the furthest thing from the truth.
 
Here's three words, Frank!

2dmdxzb.jpg
 
Back
Top