I want to know if that quote is even accurate.
Is he really saying that PPV porn on cable or in a cheap hotel room is illegal under current law? Or watching XTube? Or subscribing to Hustler?
Anyway this should be cause for concern. It seems like every time someone like Santorum goes on a crusade after some part of society they view as immoral it means they have some skeleton in their closet they're over compensating for.
I think way deep down he could be like Eliot Spitzer. He probably has a secret porno dungeon in one of his houses.
Perhaps even a major Oedipal complex that really screws up his sense of sexual self.I want to know if that quote is even accurate.
Is he really saying that PPV porn on cable or in a cheap hotel room is illegal under current law? Or watching XTube? Or subscribing to Hustler?
Anyway this should be cause for concern. It seems like every time someone like Santorum goes on a crusade after some part of society they view as immoral it means they have some skeleton in their closet they're over compensating for.
I think way deep down he could be like Eliot Spitzer. He probably has a secret porno dungeon in one of his houses.
I want to know if that quote is even accurate.
Is he really saying that PPV porn on cable or in a cheap hotel room is illegal under current law? Or watching XTube? Or subscribing to Hustler?
Anyway this should be cause for concern. It seems like every time someone like Santorum goes on a crusade after some part of society they view as immoral it means they have some skeleton in their closet they're over compensating for.
I think way deep down he could be like Eliot Spitzer. He probably has a secret porno dungeon in one of his houses.
I don't know of any current statutes (maybe someone can expand,) but the Supreme Court has left open the regulation of hardcore pornography. Roth v. U.S. rejected Hicklin (1868) and said that sex isn't synonymous with obscene but it does become obscene when it appeals to the prurient interest; there are statutes against using the mail to send obscene materials. Miller v. California went further and laid out a 3 part test for obscenity and basically said that hardcore porn can indeed be regulated.
I'm not sure exactly what Ricky was talking about, but there are some interesting legal questions brought up by this.
Perhaps even a major Oedipal complex that really screws up his sense of sexual self.![]()
Really! We actually have prohibition of alcohol at the county level in this country? Wow. Crazy stuff.
To black out foreign sites, Santorum would likely need legislative action requiring Internet service providers to use “a mandatory filter set up by the government or by the service providers,” said Volokh.