georgiaboy
Member
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2008
- Messages
- 6,489
agreed - trying to get the point across.Too many words for the American voter.
"Doing What Must Be Done"
"Doing What's Needed Now"
"Walking the Talk"
agreed - trying to get the point across.Too many words for the American voter.
Logical fallacy for several reasons...
1- By the time one starts the victory party the election is already over, and there are no more votes to be gained
2- Reelection does not typically require as much force, money, effort, etc as election does because of the power of incumbency. Of course one doesn't want to dump one's remaining warchest on a victory party, but one doesn't also have to worry about gaining votes and thus acquiring funds for a while afterwards
There are other reasons too which are not as easy to explain
No, because targeted marketing (aimed at generating a response) is always more effective than shotgun marketing. This is a known fact. Please buy some marketing books, or study campaign tactics.You can't vote if you don't know who he is. You can as easily argue that someone who looked into him because of the blimp and later votes for him voted 'because' of the blimp as you can because someone knocked on their door or sent them junk mail. (I throw that stuff out before I even take the mail in.)
Start a CFL county chapter in his area if there isn't one already, send mailers to likely Republican voters about the CFL, or Ron, or how local politicians have voted. Building an organization of activists on the ground so that when Ron does announce, everyone is already ready to go.Why are you calling a privately rented/owned billboard a "waste of funds"?
There are no funds, there is no campaign!
I won't disagree that during the campaign, roadside endeavors might be less effective than targeted houses, but Ron isn't running (present tense). This can't hurt. What is the person/people responsible for the board supposed to do for the non-existent campaign?
No, because targeted marketing (aimed at generating a response) is always more effective than shotgun marketing. This is a known fact. Please buy some marketing books, or study campaign tactics.
Events like this have their place and a purpose, raising an organization is one of them as well as training the organization (just not during campaign time for big dollars).Matt is quite vocal on this issue, where it is individual initiative, yet where money could actually be better spent he would like to see Judge Nap get paid even more than 25,000$ to do one speaking engagement which increases the costs of tickets to would be / potential supporters. I think Matt has his values mixed up to be honest.
And how many states did that approach win?Maybe RP voters need to be approached Atypically.....
And people are going to do what they want anyhow.
If you can't understand the differences as I've explained in my previous posts, then I give up.Your entire thrust here seems to be that any expenditure not directly used for GOTV is wasteful. The Victory Party excuses you list above just don't gibe with your thrust here...
Yeah, pretty much the day or 2 before the election all major expenses are finalized.Regarding the VP issue, are you saying there is some arbitrary date where spending donors money on things that will not get votes is acceptable? And as a follow up, do you expect everyone to agree with you on when this date is?
The election is already over at that point, there are no more votes to be received for along time afterward. The VP has a purpose -primarily MEDIA and secondarily a reward to the volunteers and staff!The way I see it, as far as pure vote getting goes, billboards are quite possibly more effective than victory parties...
If you can't understand the differences as I've explained in my previous posts, then I give up.
Yeah, pretty much the day or 2 before the election all major expenses are finalized.
The election is already over at that point, there are no more votes to be received for along time afterward. The VP has a purpose -primarily MEDIA and secondarily a reward to the volunteers and staff!
Sorry, my bad, I misread your post.I'll keep trying... And how long before the election are expenses that do not get votes acceptable? One year? two years? Three? When is the date your marketing expertise demands? And I'll repeat the follow-up, do you expect everyone to agree with you on when this date is?
Assuming the guy paid market price for the billboard, there are a lot more cost effective ways to do that, which is kind of my entire point.And perhaps the private individual who spent an unknown sum thought this billboard might inspire many of those who supported RP in '08 to come back to the r3VOLution; building morale
Well two things, 1 the election is over so acquiring votes isn't possible at that point in time, and secondly the PR generated by a VP event is MUCH more targeted than a billboard.I will add that earned media is just a form of advertising, with as wide a target audience as billboards...
And Ron Paul needs to shoot a 30min infomercial.
And it must be aired a lot like that "set it and forget it" rotisserie machine.
The fact that I remember "set it and forget it" is exactly why Ron Paul needs an infomercial.